|
|
04-05-2007, 10:04 PM | #1 |
Brigadier General
544
Rep 4,021
Posts
Drives: 2008 335xi Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The land where we kill baby seals
|
EU vs. Curb Weight - M3
Sorry for kicking off another thread but there is alot of confusion about the different weight standards (including much confusion by myself). So I am biting the bullet and searching......
Definitions:
BMW M6
__________________
"Aerodynamics are for people who cannot build engines"......Enzo Ferrari
|
04-05-2007, 10:09 PM | #2 |
Reincarnated
249
Rep 4,227
Posts |
Well done.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2007, 02:40 AM | #3 |
Lieutenant
50
Rep 503
Posts |
You forgot one.
DIN weight (sometimes referred to as unladen weight), which is equivalent to your defn. of Curb Weight, less fuel. That's the weight that Porsche tend to quote for all their cars (in RoW) and the one that gets repeatedly quoted in the press. Being involved with the press myself it drives me up the wall when I see Porsche's DIN weight being compared with BMW's EU1 weight and then the lazy journo concluding that the BMW is 'so' much heavier. For example, so many forum pages have been wasted discussing why the Z4M weighs 150kg+ more than a Boxster, when in actual fact the difference was more like 40kg.. So, for the DIN weight of the M3 (i.e. comparable with Porsche, Audi quoted weights etc) DIN Weight = 1655 kg - 68 kg - 7 kg - (0.9 X 63 liters X 0.76) = 1536 kg = 3386 pounds |
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2007, 03:27 AM | #4 |
Captain
36
Rep 625
Posts |
So the E92 M3 weighs barely 40 lbs more than the E46 M3 and has another 81 HP, 26 lb ft of torque, lower center of gravity (CF roof) and (soon) a 7-speed DSG transmission. That is a true accomplishment, and one I can't wait to DRIVE!
__________________
Driving sideways: It's not faster, but damn it's more fun!
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2007, 03:38 AM | #5 |
Lieutenant
50
Rep 503
Posts |
Not according to my numbers. Comparing BMW quoted weights the E92 M3 weighs 85kg more than the E46 M3, which is 187lbs..
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2007, 05:24 AM | #7 | |
Lieutenant
26
Rep 580
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2007, 08:35 AM | #8 |
First Lieutenant
12
Rep 396
Posts |
Everything's bigger in ...
68Kg driver in Europe.
I find this quite interesting as several American drivers of this car may well be in excess of 100Kg. I myself weigh 76-77Kg at 6ft tall and am often asked why I am so thin. I think it's quite interesting how large Americans have gotten.
__________________
Now:'05 G35 6MT\Laser Red\Beige\Sport\Premium
06/2008: M3, 335+Dinan, or ... |
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2007, 08:58 AM | #9 |
Lieutenant
26
Rep 580
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2007, 03:24 AM | #11 |
Private First Class
32
Rep 112
Posts |
Guys,
From the recently-posted UK press kit documentation, it says: "And just how consistently this development target has been translated into reality in terms of intelligent lightweight engineering is borne out by the car's power-to-weight ratio of only 3.8 kg (8.4 lb) per horsepower." This means the E92 M3 will either weigh: 8.4 x 414 = 3,477 lbs or 8.4 x 420 = 3,528 lbs Yes? |
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2007, 06:04 AM | #12 |
Lieutenant
50
Rep 503
Posts |
The reality is that the weight is still being determined depending on final spec in each country, so you will see some discrepancies between the initial press release and what actually gets delivered to the customer.
According to the press release, and using the 3.8kg/hp figure then the M3 weighs 1596 kg, the spec sheet says 1655 kg and if we just look at the DIN figure then that figure is 1536 kg. (i.e. 3511 lbs, 3641 lbs and 3379 lbs) It depends on whether these first two figures were both quoted to EU1 standard (I doubt it). Take your pick.. I hope to find out when EVO stick it on some weighing scales side by side with RS4, CSL etc.. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2007, 08:49 AM | #13 | |
Brigadier General
544
Rep 4,021
Posts
Drives: 2008 335xi Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The land where we kill baby seals
|
Quote:
__________________
"Aerodynamics are for people who cannot build engines"......Enzo Ferrari
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2007, 09:28 AM | #14 | |
Lieutenant
50
Rep 503
Posts |
Quote:
Use the M3 CSL as an example. The first press release talked about a weight of 1385, but later press releases (and the eventual brochure) used the 1460kg figure. Both apparently to the same EU1 standard. In fact the typical 'actual' weight of the car (to EU1 stnd) would have been around 1495kg (including a/c and xenon lights), which is around 1376kg DIN. The original figure quoted in the press release would have been amazing, but was completely unrealistic. Either a case of the marketing boys getting ahead of themselves or human error. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2007, 09:11 PM | #15 |
Lieutenant
15
Rep 471
Posts |
Another data point...
E92 335 EU Weight - 1600kg E92 M3 EU Weight - 1655kg E92 335 US Curb Weight - 3571lb E92 M3 US Curb Weight (est) - 3571lb + 55kg = 3692lb Porsche here I come. -Adam |
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2007, 03:40 PM | #16 |
First Lieutenant
7
Rep 319
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2007, 04:17 PM | #17 |
Lieutenant
50
Rep 503
Posts |
For those who are interested in analysing further information about this whole unladen/kerb weight subject. I looked back at some data from last year when during EVO's Fast Club article in May '06 the RS4 was weighed and so was the M6.
Now having used these very same scales in a recent group test for the magazine, I know how careful they are about getting accurate figures and also that the scales are calibrated correctly. Both cars were specced with the options you would normall expect (they were weighed with full fuel tanks, so I have subtracted the weight of these from the actual figure); RS4 - manuf quoted unladen weight - 1650 kg; Actual - 1694 kg (1740 kg with fuel) M6 - manuf quoted unladen weight - 1657 kg; Actual - 1709 kg (1762 kg with fuel) So as you can see the RS4 was only 15kg lighter than the M6. BMW's figures suggest the E92 M3 will be 135 kg lighter than the M6, so if that is true then the E92 M3 should be 120kg (or 264 lbs) lighter than the RS4. The 997 C2S came in at 1460 kg (with fuel). |
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2007, 04:22 PM | #19 | |
Lieutenant
15
Rep 471
Posts |
Quote:
-Adam |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2007, 04:49 PM | #21 | |
Brigadier General
544
Rep 4,021
Posts
Drives: 2008 335xi Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The land where we kill baby seals
|
Quote:
Good stuff Steved.... The real issue will be what standard equipment BMWUSA will put into the standard car...... If it is a stripper, and people stuff with options, we need to look at the weight of the car that people actually want.
__________________
"Aerodynamics are for people who cannot build engines"......Enzo Ferrari
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2007, 04:57 PM | #22 | |
Lieutenant
50
Rep 503
Posts |
Quote:
The E92 M3's Curb weight (total weight of the vehicle with standard equipment, all necessary operating consumables (such as motor oil and coolant), a full tank of fuel and not loaded with either passengers or cargo) = 3485 lbs. The variance in spec depending on country/region is unlikely to vary no more than 20-30kg (40-60 lbs) from this figure. Engine power has already been quoted at 420 PS (eq. 414 hp). When we actually get to weigh a car and test it on a rolling road, these figures may differ, but in terms of comparing it with other cars that should provide you with a sufficient guide. For example, comparing the power/weight ratio of E92 M3 against the 997 C2S, tells you the following (with the M3 weighing just over 110kg more than the C2S - and 50kg less than the 997 TT by the way); E92 M3 - 261 hp/tonne 997 C2S - 237 hp/tonne |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|