![]() |
|
|
| 01-14-2016, 04:10 AM | #1 |
|
First Lieutenant
![]() ![]()
57
Rep 363
Posts |
2011 e92 m3 bolt on vs RS5 stock, M3 FTW
Felt like making this thread, originally i thought the RS5 would put up a bit of a fight, but then i realized it had no chance. So, did a off the line pull, 2 times, 20 roll, 40 roll, and all in favor of the m3 FTMFW!!!
Just incase someone asks what the mods were to the M at the time! 2011 M3 e92 Comp Pack, Yokohama tires, gintani tune ecu+dct, MS test pipe, MS pulley, MS intake, MPE exhaust + 2 guys in the M 2013 AUDI RS5, fully loaded, guy and girl in car I won't be posting the videos, not trying to hear all the BS from people who will be against it, lets just say M3 won fair and square and was 3-4 car lengths ahead in no time, especially off the roll. So if anyone wondered, now you know! Have no fear, for a RS5 will be nowhere near!
__________________
M Performance, Gintani, Macht Schnell, Ohlins, Vorshlag, yokohama...
|
| 01-14-2016, 12:05 PM | #4 |
|
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() 686
Rep 1,749
Posts |
Lots of videos out thete. Stock for stock the m3 wins. That fsi 4 2 l v8 has always put down crappy numbers, also largely due to losses through awd. Stock m3 beats stock r8 v8 with same rs5 engine
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 01-15-2016, 03:43 PM | #5 |
|
First Lieutenant
![]() ![]()
57
Rep 363
Posts |
sorry no video, just wanted to tell my story! Don't want to incriminate myself in any way, but I'm sure there are videos on youtube too agree with this. Hope all the other m3s succeeded as well : )
__________________
M Performance, Gintani, Macht Schnell, Ohlins, Vorshlag, yokohama...
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 01-16-2016, 04:12 AM | #6 |
|
Major General
![]() ![]()
5359
Rep 7,596
Posts |
Not surprised 818. Did a few toy runs with a mate and his RS5. Both bone stock, pretty much side to side with the M3 ahead a few meters by 120pmh isch.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 01-16-2016, 06:07 PM | #7 |
|
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() 686
Rep 1,749
Posts |
Ya rs5 was a major disapointment. You think the m3 has relatively low bottom end torque, try lugging 4300 pounds around with a high revving v8 that puts out less power than m3. It's a car that needs twin turbo at that weight and 70 more hp
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
| Bookmarks |
|
|