|
|
10-24-2009, 06:57 AM | #23 |
4 * General
56
Rep 644
Posts |
yeaaaa!
__________________
Nissan GT-R (Sold) E92 M3 + 335 (sold) F10 535 (sold) When Driving Nice Whips It Helps To Have Nice Kix!
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-26-2009, 05:06 AM | #24 |
8 tracks of madness
62
Rep 2,735
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-26-2009, 09:34 PM | #25 |
4 * General
56
Rep 644
Posts |
i want to use an aftermarket amp and i currently have the premium sound system. so 2 or 4 ohm for the sub replacement?
__________________
Nissan GT-R (Sold) E92 M3 + 335 (sold) F10 535 (sold) When Driving Nice Whips It Helps To Have Nice Kix!
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2009, 02:14 AM | #26 |
8 tracks of madness
62
Rep 2,735
Posts |
Again, it depends on the amp. If it's a 2-channel amp then most likely you'd want 2 Ohm subs. it would get you more average power than 4 Ohm subs but the 4 Ohm subs would have more dynamics. If it's a mono, or single channel, sub amp then it will depend on how low a load the amp is stable to. if it'll do 1 Ohm then you want 2 Ohm subs in parallel. If it's only stable to 2 Ohms then you want the 4 Ohm subs in parallel.
Basically, I need to know what amp you are looking at. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2009, 06:09 AM | #27 | |
4 * General
56
Rep 644
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Nissan GT-R (Sold) E92 M3 + 335 (sold) F10 535 (sold) When Driving Nice Whips It Helps To Have Nice Kix!
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2009, 10:26 AM | #28 |
8 tracks of madness
62
Rep 2,735
Posts |
Why not the 1.600 or 1.1000? same chassis but MUCH more power. You'd have to run the 8s as true subs and not midbasses but that sounds like your plan anyway. If you want to keep it stereo then I'd do a bridged 4.150 with the 4 ohm subs. Then you can either run more power to the fronts and the subs or you could birdge it just to the subs.
Are you happy with the overall volume now and just looking for more bass? |
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2009, 12:46 PM | #29 |
4 * General
56
Rep 644
Posts |
precisely. i just need more of a punch and a lil bit of lows for the base. so which setup shud i go with?
__________________
Nissan GT-R (Sold) E92 M3 + 335 (sold) F10 535 (sold) When Driving Nice Whips It Helps To Have Nice Kix!
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2009, 03:10 PM | #30 |
Colonel
299
Rep 2,874
Posts |
+1 on this whole thread. If anyone could post a parts/equipment list and a DIY, I would be very greatful. Panda, if you do your set up, could we meet so I can hear it?
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2009, 03:23 PM | #31 |
Colonel
183
Rep 2,872
Posts |
Yeah, I think I am going to do this for sure, right after the SC install.
So if I use the Rockford Fosgate, should I stick with the 2ohm? I think its 2 channel and I keep looking around and can only find the 4ohm subs now |
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2009, 03:29 PM | #32 | |
Racying Dynamics
118
Rep 4,391
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
==================================================
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2009, 03:59 PM | #33 |
Major
100
Rep 1,035
Posts |
See my first post in this thread back in April, 2008. I spoke directly with one of the engineers before the 2 ohm version came out and he gave me the scoop. The skinny is that the sub was designed to drop into the original box and use the OEM amp while being more efficient.
I have not verified that it will just drop in without a spacer and I don't think that is the case. But the engineer was very clear with me that they felt the 2 ohm load was OK for the OEM amp to handle. With sufficient stability, the lower impedance will squeeze some more power and ultimately provide more output. If I were upgrading, what I would do is buy the 2 ohm sub and try it on the OEM amp. If not satisified with the output, 2 ohm subs are extremely flexible. You can run it stereo to maximize output of 2 ohm stable amps. You can run it parallel mono 1 ohm so you can use those powerful and efficient class D amps. You can wire it 4 ohm series mono which can make use of bridged channels on a 2 ohm stereo/4 ohm mono stable amp. 2 ohm, IMO, is the way to go...
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2009, 04:10 PM | #34 |
8 tracks of madness
62
Rep 2,735
Posts |
I'd still do the 4.150 bridged to the 4 ohm subs. Simply because it's more power and more flexible when you decide to expand later. And IME, you will want to upgrade later.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2009, 04:12 PM | #35 |
8 tracks of madness
62
Rep 2,735
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2009, 10:18 PM | #36 | |
Lieutenant General
2288
Rep 13,001
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2009, 10:19 PM | #37 |
Lieutenant General
2288
Rep 13,001
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2009, 11:22 PM | #39 | |
Major
100
Rep 1,035
Posts |
Quote:
The verdict is 2 ohm AFAIC. With Technic's warning, you cannot use the OEM amp on Premium sound systems so you must get an aftermarket amp. With non-premium, you can get more power using a 2 ohm sub. If you go aftermarket, you still have a variety wiring configurations as a 2 ohm pair is flexible for almost any amp.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2009, 11:51 PM | #40 |
Lieutenant Colonel
265
Rep 1,696
Posts |
Not my car, but something I found. If our car needs two 8" subs, is the Rockford P300.2 going to be sufficient? This amp can deliver 150 w x 2 channels at 2 ohms. http://www.rockfordfosgate.com/produ...0&locale=en_us Where can I buy the 2 ohm, 8", SWS sub? Update: http://www.audioonesavings.com/product/view/109 It appears that the 2 ohm model is: SWS 8XI. Last edited by frankzlin79; 10-28-2009 at 12:12 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-28-2009, 12:17 AM | #41 |
Racying Dynamics
118
Rep 4,391
Posts |
What do you suggest the subs should be and what amp? Brand and all if possible. Thanks for the info.
__________________
==================================================
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-28-2009, 12:50 AM | #43 |
Lieutenant Colonel
265
Rep 1,696
Posts |
I'm sure it is a bad mic. Because he had the car volume up pretty loud, the sub will definitely distort any inferior microphone found on digital cameras.
For those who have the SWS subs, with an after-market amp, please comment on the sound quality. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|