|
|
|
|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
04-14-2008, 06:38 PM | #133 |
Racying Dynamics
118
Rep 4,391
Posts |
Well whatever, fantastic video!! Thanks for posting and taking the time to edit that. The car sounds great.
__________________
==================================================
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2008, 07:04 PM | #134 |
Brigadier General
221
Rep 3,592
Posts |
Sounds great...thanks for taking the time, I can't wait to hear this IRL...maybe next to a Eisenmann so I can really make my choice, and see which I like better...
__________________
'08 E92 M3 6MT | IB | FR | RAC RG63's | VRS Ti Exhaust | Fabspeed HFC & Xpipe '09 X5 35d SG/SB '11 X3 28i AW/CN/FW (wife's car |
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2008, 01:25 AM | #135 |
Lieutenant
85
Rep 411
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2008, 09:01 AM | #136 |
Racying Dynamics
118
Rep 4,391
Posts |
OK that means the circumference of your front tire is 2.2% smaller than OE and the rear is negligable. In any even, your speedo should be about 2.2% faster (smaller circumference) that OE plus the OE error that is said to be around 5%. South can probably varify these things I am just taking information from other threads. But it makes sense that your speedo may be off by around 7%.
__________________
==================================================
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2008, 09:13 AM | #138 | |
Lieutenant
85
Rep 411
Posts |
Quote:
And when using the Miata tyre calculator the fronts only show a difference of 0,3%. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2008, 09:24 AM | #139 |
Racying Dynamics
118
Rep 4,391
Posts |
Well thanks for that information, that does dispels some of the rumors about the speedo being 5% off (up) from stock!! I need to do the same sometime. 0.3% is nothing!!
__________________
==================================================
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|