|
|
05-28-2020, 02:52 PM | #45 | |
///M Powered for Life
11736
Rep 10,458
Posts |
Quote:
For 20 min of hard driving which is typical of a hpde it's supposed to be ok |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-28-2020, 03:04 PM | #47 |
Colonel
994
Rep 2,493
Posts |
alright guys, the latest email from the pro's at Bimmerworld........
Hey Nick, I would highly recommend not doing the 3.62. I think The 3.45 is the farthest I would push it. I had a customer purchase a 3.62 for his DCT car and the car would not even move after it was installed due to it being in a sort of mechanical check mate since the transmission had no clue what was going on with the final drive. Also, with Watkin Glen's massive back straight, I would want as much gear as possible. Let's stick with the 3.45 for sure. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-28-2020, 03:17 PM | #48 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
1557
Rep 1,634
Posts |
Quote:
Obviously it's up to you. But lots of people have gone 3.62 without problem (assuming you get it coded), so I wouldn't worry about that or the top speed as discussed previously. If you're more comfortable doing 3.45 though, then do that. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-28-2020, 03:31 PM | #50 | ||
///M Powered for Life
11736
Rep 10,458
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
It is extremely recent that the info is finally out there for the 3.62 gear. 170mph is more than any of us are going to see at WGI |
||
Appreciate
0
|
05-28-2020, 03:51 PM | #51 | ||
Banned
1608
Rep 2,883
Posts |
Quote:
I love the sounds of the shifts. Formula One style :-) |
||
Appreciate
0
|
05-28-2020, 03:53 PM | #52 | |||
Colonel
994
Rep 2,493
Posts |
Quote:
|
|||
Appreciate
0
|
05-28-2020, 03:54 PM | #53 | |
Banned
1608
Rep 2,883
Posts |
Quote:
With Alex 3.62 tune, it works as it should. Before Alex 3.62 tune, it worked at the high rpm range, but was confused a bit in the mid rpm range. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-28-2020, 03:55 PM | #54 | |||
Colonel
994
Rep 2,493
Posts |
Quote:
Also...only cars seeing those top speeds 170+ at the Glen are NASCAR/Formula cars |
|||
Appreciate
1
SYT_Shadow11736.00 |
05-28-2020, 04:30 PM | #55 | |
4886
Rep 2,606
Posts |
Quote:
I also couldn't imagine running out of top end with the 3.62 on any of the tracks here. I'm sure the diff offered through BW is a fabulous piece of kit - and you would likely love the gains from the 3.45 on top of the massive benefit of the diff - but I would not discount the 3.62 based on that response. It has been proven to work. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-28-2020, 04:43 PM | #56 | ||||
Colonel
994
Rep 2,493
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
Appreciate
3
|
05-28-2020, 04:50 PM | #57 |
///M Powered for Life
11736
Rep 10,458
Posts |
Ugh tonight i'm going to dream of diffonline's race carrier with the 3.62...
Thanks a lot everyone |
05-28-2020, 05:00 PM | #58 |
4886
Rep 2,606
Posts |
|
05-28-2020, 07:20 PM | #63 |
Brigadier General
4095
Rep 4,341
Posts |
I have a 3.45 with a Giken LSD and I love it! Much better acceleration and I don't have to deal with overly high rpms during cruising since my car is a daily driver. The 3.45 really improved acceleration in all rpms, so I can only imagine the 3.62 would be better. If the car is purely weekend/track toy, I would go 3.62 for sure. For daily driving 3.45 makes more sense.
|
Appreciate
1
nicksm3994.00 |
05-28-2020, 07:33 PM | #64 |
Major
1074
Rep 1,033
Posts |
On my short list but it's not cheap to do either. Ideally I'd prefer to have a complete 4.10 rear end and be able to pull and stick my OE on a shelf which only makes the whole thing cost that much more.
__________________
Steve::::2012 AW E92::::IG - @sjs0433
|
Appreciate
1
SAMM3Y3089.50 |
05-28-2020, 07:39 PM | #65 | |
Colonel
994
Rep 2,493
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-28-2020, 09:04 PM | #66 | |
Colonel
3090
Rep 2,747
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
9ers
|
|
Appreciate
2
SYT_Shadow11736.00 M3E90sedan119.50 |
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|