Try out the new beta site for M3Post. You can read more about what's happening here
BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts

Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Engine, Transmission, Exhaust, Drivetrain, ECU Software Modifications
 
Mporium BMW
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
      10-01-2017, 01:15 PM   #23
Lucrecio84
Captain
Lucrecio84's Avatar
United_States
280
Rep
791
Posts

Drives: TTE92 m3/ F10 CP M5
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Anaheim, California

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kwike92Msport View Post
Calling BS. There is barely any room to fit a single turbo, much less the setup and plumbing for 2. Also, there is no turbo spool in any part of that video.

Lets say you figure out some way to fit it all, there is no benefit to turbocharging the vehicle when the engine can really only handle 8-10PSI of boost at max. Even running conservative amounts of boost (12-16psi) would destroy an S65. You would have to lower the compression ratio so low to compensate for the added boost at higher RPMs, that im not sure the engine would idle, much less build enough power to get the turbos to spool.

Also, part of me wants to be wrong so bad. Always wanted to see a 1000whp M3 to shut GTR owners up.
I fit twin gt30r turbo's in my e92 m3. Motor is almost done being built so you will be seeing a 1000whp m3 very soon
__________________

GINTANI TWIN TURBO E92/F10 M5
Appreciate 0
      10-01-2017, 01:37 PM   #24
TrAcK TRaP
bOrN To DiE
United_States
424
Rep
1,737
Posts

Drives: 2011 E92 M3 ZCP
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: South Jersey

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucrecio84 View Post
I fit twin gt30r turbo's in my e92 m3. Motor is almost done being built so you will be seeing a 1000whp m3 very soon
maybe its possible but it won't last long. Remember torque brings the HP and these cars can't take over 600 wtq. I am coming from N54 335i with 658 whp 496wtq with full of problems I am happy with trade if I wanted fast straight line car I would've keep my N54. E9x M3's are not fast on straight line..
Appreciate 0
      10-01-2017, 01:51 PM   #25
///M Power-Belgium
General
///M Power-Belgium's Avatar
92182
Rep
31,410
Posts

Drives: ///M3-E92-DCT
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Belgium

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrAcK TRaP View Post
maybe its possible but it won't last long. Remember torque brings the HP and these cars can't take over 600 wtq. I am coming from N54 335i with 658 whp 496wtq with full of problems I am happy with trade if I wanted fast straight line car I would've keep my N54. E9x M3's are not fast on straight line..
So a 0-62 in 4.6 sec. is not fast ?
__________________
"MAX VERSTAPPEN" IS THE 2021+2022+2023+2024 F1 WORLD CHAMPION - #UnLeashTheLion -

BPM DEV-Tune & DCT Software-Tune & Servotronic & coding ///Alpine HID Angeleyes ///Oem.exhaust mod.

Last edited by ///M Power-Belgium; 10-01-2017 at 02:19 PM..
Appreciate 0
      10-01-2017, 03:45 PM   #26
OM VT3
Lieutenant Colonel
OM VT3's Avatar
164
Rep
1,665
Posts

Drives: 2011 e92 zcp m3
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Somewhere

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ///M Power-Belgium View Post
So a 0-62 in 4.6 sec. is not fast ?
Not really
Appreciate 0
      10-01-2017, 03:50 PM   #27
OM VT3
Lieutenant Colonel
OM VT3's Avatar
164
Rep
1,665
Posts

Drives: 2011 e92 zcp m3
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Somewhere

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucrecio84 View Post
I fit twin gt30r turbo's in my e92 m3. Motor is almost done being built so you will be seeing a 1000whp m3 very soon
Are you using gtx3076r's?
Appreciate 0
      10-01-2017, 04:18 PM   #28
Lucrecio84
Captain
Lucrecio84's Avatar
United_States
280
Rep
791
Posts

Drives: TTE92 m3/ F10 CP M5
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Anaheim, California

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrAcK TRaP View Post
maybe its possible but it won't last long. Remember torque brings the HP and these cars can't take over 600 wtq. I am coming from N54 335i with 658 whp 496wtq with full of problems I am happy with trade if I wanted fast straight line car I would've keep my N54. E9x M3's are not fast on straight line..
I know I bent a rod when it was stock. Hence the reason for completely building the motor and changing all internals and dropping compression.
__________________

GINTANI TWIN TURBO E92/F10 M5
Appreciate 0
      10-01-2017, 04:20 PM   #29
Lucrecio84
Captain
Lucrecio84's Avatar
United_States
280
Rep
791
Posts

Drives: TTE92 m3/ F10 CP M5
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Anaheim, California

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by OM VT3 View Post
Are you using gtx3076r's?
I was using them but switching to 35r's now with built motor and dropped compression. Shooting for 1000 wheel on e85
__________________

GINTANI TWIN TURBO E92/F10 M5
Appreciate 0
      10-01-2017, 05:09 PM   #30
OM VT3
Lieutenant Colonel
OM VT3's Avatar
164
Rep
1,665
Posts

Drives: 2011 e92 zcp m3
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Somewhere

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucrecio84 View Post
I was using them but switching to 35r's now with built motor and dropped compression. Shooting for 1000 wheel on e85
You can easily make 1000whp on twin 3076r's you're cars gonna be laggy
Appreciate 0
      10-01-2017, 07:28 PM   #31
Shredicus
Major
Shredicus's Avatar
543
Rep
1,122
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Spokane, WA

iTrader: (12)

E85 does help with lag a bit due to 30% additional exhaust mass
Appreciate 0
      10-01-2017, 07:44 PM   #32
Lucrecio84
Captain
Lucrecio84's Avatar
United_States
280
Rep
791
Posts

Drives: TTE92 m3/ F10 CP M5
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Anaheim, California

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by OM VT3 View Post
You can easily make 1000whp on twin 3076r's you're cars gonna be laggy
yea trying to stay away from too much torque down low but well see
__________________

GINTANI TWIN TURBO E92/F10 M5
Appreciate 0
      10-01-2017, 08:15 PM   #33
OM VT3
Lieutenant Colonel
OM VT3's Avatar
164
Rep
1,665
Posts

Drives: 2011 e92 zcp m3
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Somewhere

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shredicus View Post
E85 does help with lag a bit due to 30% additional exhaust mass
Still going to be laggy with only 2l feeding the turbos
Appreciate 0
      10-01-2017, 08:19 PM   #34
OM VT3
Lieutenant Colonel
OM VT3's Avatar
164
Rep
1,665
Posts

Drives: 2011 e92 zcp m3
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Somewhere

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucrecio84 View Post
yea trying to stay away from too much torque down low but well see
That's easy with a syvecs that's all on tuning. You can do boost by gear boost by speed also have tq management I would have gone with gtx3076r's and pulled out the TQ down low with the syvecs but still will be a nice build
Appreciate 0
      10-01-2017, 10:25 PM   #35
Jpfabrications
Jpfabrications's Avatar
United_States
34
Rep
162
Posts

Drives: 135,335,M3 & M4
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: so california

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by OM VT3 View Post
Still going to be laggy with only 2l feeding the turbos
Shouldn't be that laggy with these twin setups you want to stay away from all that TQ at the low end this is what will kill the motor. We are running 2 precision 6266's on our car with full boost at 3500rpms.
Appreciate 0
      10-02-2017, 03:08 PM   #36
AWTT335i
First Lieutenant
12
Rep
369
Posts

Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: United states

iTrader: (0)

Wow, steer clear of this company. Scammed many people in the 335 community. Buyer beware...
Appreciate 0
      10-02-2017, 04:36 PM   #37
BusaR8
Private
28
Rep
73
Posts

Drives: cls 335 busa
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: usa

iTrader: (0)

I wouldn't say scammed, lots of n54 guys with there kits including me now long waits bad customer service yes. But if there doing in house installs of the kit then its a pretty good deal.
Appreciate 0
      10-02-2017, 09:34 PM   #38
Mit_Boost
Captain
Germany
137
Rep
691
Posts

Drives: E90 335
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: NJ

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by OM VT3 View Post
Still going to be laggy with only 2l feeding the turbos
Are you kidding? The AMS Alpha 10 packages for the Porsche 997.1 (3.6L) runs Tial Alpha 3076s makes over 500 WTQ by 4k RPMs, with a 7k redline. The M3 has more displacement and a higher redline, so lag should be nearly nonexistent if you're keeping it in the boost curve.

Twin turbo charging a S65 is like turboing a GT3. The engine has so much volumetric efficiency that as long as you're bolting on reasonably sized turbos, it'll move enough air that you won't even have a chance to look at your watch and check how long it takes for boost to build. Another example would be a stock motor TT-Gallardo. Twin 6266s and it hits peak TQ at 5k RPMs, carries the power out all the way to 8k.
__________________

Results >
Appreciate 1
      10-02-2017, 10:41 PM   #39
BusaR8
Private
28
Rep
73
Posts

Drives: cls 335 busa
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: usa

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mit_Boost View Post
Are you kidding? The AMS Alpha 10 packages for the Porsche 997.1 (3.6L) runs Tial Alpha 3076s makes over 500 WTQ by 4k RPMs, with a 7k redline. The M3 has more displacement and a higher redline, so lag should be nearly nonexistent if you're keeping it in the boost curve.

Twin turbo charging a S65 is like turboing a GT3. The engine has so much volumetric efficiency that as long as you're bolting on reasonably sized turbos, it'll move enough air that you won't even have a chance to look at your watch and check how long it takes for boost to build. Another example would be a stock motor TT-Gallardo. Twin 6266s and it hits peak TQ at 5k RPMs, carries the power out all the way to 8k.
This ^
Appreciate 0
      10-02-2017, 11:34 PM   #40
OM VT3
Lieutenant Colonel
OM VT3's Avatar
164
Rep
1,665
Posts

Drives: 2011 e92 zcp m3
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Somewhere

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mit_Boost View Post
Are you kidding? The AMS Alpha 10 packages for the Porsche 997.1 (3.6L) runs Tial Alpha 3076s makes over 500 WTQ by 4k RPMs, with a 7k redline. The M3 has more displacement and a higher redline, so lag should be nearly nonexistent if you're keeping it in the boost curve.

Twin turbo charging a S65 is like turboing a GT3. The engine has so much volumetric efficiency that as long as you're bolting on reasonably sized turbos, it'll move enough air that you won't even have a chance to look at your watch and check how long it takes for boost to build. Another example would be a stock motor TT-Gallardo. Twin 6266s and it hits peak TQ at 5k RPMs, carries the power out all the way to 8k.
I've driven a built SR20 that was a 2.2l with a gtx3076r felt laggy and it reved to 8 or 9k and an Australian ford that come out with a inline 6 that is 4l that had a 1 gtx3582 still felt laggy maybe I'm wrong but a s65 with twin gtx3582's is going to be far from responsive

Not sure why you would be using an 850hp turbo anyway a 3076r would be the best and you can still make big power
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2017, 02:24 AM   #41
BusaR8
Private
28
Rep
73
Posts

Drives: cls 335 busa
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: usa

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by OM VT3 View Post
I've driven a built SR20 that was a 2.2l with a gtx3076r felt laggy and it reved to 8 or 9k and an Australian ford that come out with a inline 6 that is 4l that had a 1 gtx3582 still felt laggy maybe I'm wrong but a s65 with twin gtx3582's is going to be far from responsive

Not sure why you would be using an 850hp turbo anyway a 3076r would be the best and you can still make big power

Dude a gtx 3582 turbo does not flow 850hp lol
700hp 750 maybe
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2017, 04:48 PM   #42
OM VT3
Lieutenant Colonel
OM VT3's Avatar
164
Rep
1,665
Posts

Drives: 2011 e92 zcp m3
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Somewhere

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BusaR8 View Post
Dude a gtx 3582 turbo does not flow 850hp lol
700hp 750 maybe
I know a car with 2 speed power glide and big converter making just under 700whp on e85 here
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2017, 07:48 PM   #43
Mit_Boost
Captain
Germany
137
Rep
691
Posts

Drives: E90 335
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: NJ

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by OM VT3 View Post
I've driven a built SR20 that was a 2.2l with a gtx3076r felt laggy and it reved to 8 or 9k and an Australian ford that come out with a inline 6 that is 4l that had a 1 gtx3582 still felt laggy maybe I'm wrong but a s65 with twin gtx3582's is going to be far from responsive

Not sure why you would be using an 850hp turbo anyway a 3076r would be the best and you can still make big power
Once again, the S65 has a very high volumetric efficiency. It's the same reason why we can bolt-on a supercharger with single-digit boost and add 200 HP+. Another example? The Shelby GT350 has cracked over 1,000 WHP with both a supercharger and twin-turbo stock motor bolt-on kit. Why? The Voodoo engine has very high volumetric efficiency.

And the 3076R could do 1,000 WHP, but the turbo probably won't last very long at that boost level. You'd be much better off using a bigger turbo, like that the GT35R, and keeping it right in it's efficiency range, especially if you'd like to run different boost settings (i.e., low-boost for pump gas and high-boost for race gas/ethanol). Add in a well designed, twin-scroll manifold and you probably won't have much "lag" after 4k RPMs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by OM VT3 View Post
I know a car with 2 speed power glide and big converter making just under 700whp on e85 here
2-speed power glide and E85 sounds like it's a purpose built, high compression ratio engine that never is run on pump gas. That's not exactly a fair representation of that turbo's performance.
__________________

Results >
Appreciate 1
      10-03-2017, 10:46 PM   #44
OM VT3
Lieutenant Colonel
OM VT3's Avatar
164
Rep
1,665
Posts

Drives: 2011 e92 zcp m3
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Somewhere

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mit_Boost View Post
Once again, the S65 has a very high volumetric efficiency. It's the same reason why we can bolt-on a supercharger with single-digit boost and add 200 HP+. Another example? The Shelby GT350 has cracked over 1,000 WHP with both a supercharger and twin-turbo stock motor bolt-on kit. Why? The Voodoo engine has very high volumetric efficiency.

And the 3076R could do 1,000 WHP, but the turbo probably won't last very long at that boost level. You'd be much better off using a bigger turbo, like that the GT35R, and keeping it right in it's efficiency range, especially if you'd like to run different boost settings (i.e., low-boost for pump gas and high-boost for race gas/ethanol). Add in a well designed, twin-scroll manifold and you probably won't have much "lag" after 4k RPMs.



2-speed power glide and E85 sounds like it's a purpose built, high compression ratio engine that never is run on pump gas. That's not exactly a fair representation of that turbo's performance.
Lol that is all not true I will post videos tonight they are all stock motor cars some with just a zf that people here drive as there daily
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST