interesting!
might have to try this out.
might have to try this out.
CodeRed wroteJ08M3's correct - completely unnecessary:I completely disagree with your statement, as it was VERY obvious on my car...it made a distinct difference. Do you really think that BMW puts in fake CD valves? What purpose would that serve, as the part is unnecessary otherwise. Although, it still don't agree with why they put them in to begin with, as it really ruins the clutch action...then again I don't do "burn outs" or drag racing so they wouldn't have to be concerned with my type of use.
CatchM3 wrote18. the one that kind of looks like a shock absorber.
tom @ eas wroteHard to draw a lot of conclusions from that photo, please elaborate on why it even exists then based upon you hypothesis?
J08M3 wrote+1I suspect the feeling most people talk about the CDV causing is being mistaken for the feeling you get from the spring. The change in spring rate would give you a feeling in your foot that the clutch in engaging, but in fact it's really just a change in the pressure on your foot from the pedal. This is why it's hard to shift smooth with the spring still in. Just my guess after reading numerous threads about what the CDV is supposed to do.
GewoW wroteCan you elaborate on the change without the CDV? Do you still have your pedal spring in or have you taken it out also?Not true at all...Having changed the CDV on my car, it is 100% different. This only applied if you're talking about what CDVs do in general. About the M3, I don't know.
GewoW wroteA 335 and M3 are completely different in this sense, there are no restrictions on the valve in an e9X M3.It's still there. The shifts are excessively smooth. It was practically impossible to get a super-smooth shift with the CDV installed from 1st to 2nd...and many times 2nd to 3rd was glitchy. The clutch was set to re-engage at a set maximum rate, so one didn't have complete control over when it re-engaged so a shift that would normally work out well did not. It was a pretty constrained CDV, and replacing it with a emptied one completely, and I mean COMPLETELY, changed the dynamics of the car. Ask anyone with a 335 that has done the mod.
GewoW wroteBut we're talking about the M3 not the 335.It's still there. The shifts are excessively smooth. It was practically impossible to get a super-smooth shift with the CDV installed from 1st to 2nd...and many times 2nd to 3rd was glitchy. The clutch was set to re-engage at a set maximum rate, so one didn't have complete control over when it re-engaged so a shift that would normally work out well did not. It was a pretty constrained CDV, and replacing it with a emptied one completely, and I mean COMPLETELY, changed the dynamics of the car. Ask anyone with a 335 that has done the mod.
J08M3 wroteTrue, thank you for that...I mixed up 2 threads with very similar topics! Either way though, the M3 CDV may be less restricted, but unless someone changes it or removes it, and supports the idea that it's the same feeling with or without it, then I'll believe it's not restricted.But we're talking about the M3 not the 335.
CatchM3 wroteGlad to hear it worked out well...enjoy!!!the spring removal went smoothly. definitely an improvement

CodeRed wroteNo idea - we just know its not a restriction.Hard to draw a lot of conclusions from that photo, please elaborate on why it even exists then based upon you hypothesis?

J08M3 wroteThat picture in and of itself proves absolutely nothing..you can't see thru both of them can you??Yep, that's the right spring. Nope it doesn't provide lateral support. It just looks like it would cause it's big.
GewoW have you looked at the pic provided by Tom@EAS? Do you still not believe it's not restricted?
CodeRed wroteI took the pic along with what Tom@eas said to be true.That picture in and of itself proves absolutely nothing..you can't see thru both of them can you??