bipp wroteLooks great! Have been curious what it would look like with no spacers, thanks to your photo, it works well. Thank you.
487.2KVIEWS
746REPLIES
931APPRECIATES
05-05-2026LAST POST
Fineline wroteApologies for forgetting to update - this pic actually has a 5mm in the front to clear the strut, due to ECF rim protectors. But visually, it should maybe look better without the spacer since there's a tiny bit of poke up front.Looks great! Have been curious what it would look like with no spacers, thanks to your photo, it works well. Thank you.
I miss those, wish they had more brake clearance
BBS RI-A
Refinished similarly to diamond silver
18x10 +25 (5mm spacer to clear ohlins)
18x11 +37 (12.5mm spacer)
Falken RT660
265/35/18
295/30/18
Installed yesterday, thinking about going a tad lower, but this height is functional and works.
Refinished similarly to diamond silver
18x10 +25 (5mm spacer to clear ohlins)
18x11 +37 (12.5mm spacer)
Falken RT660
265/35/18
295/30/18
Installed yesterday, thinking about going a tad lower, but this height is functional and works.
danylo wroteNah it looks good like that. As you said, functional but also aesthetically pleasing.BBS RI-A
Refinished similarly to diamond silver
18x10 +25 (5mm spacer to clear ohlins)
18x11 +37 (12.5mm spacer)
Falken RT660
265/35/18
295/30/18
Installed yesterday, thinking about going a tad lower, but this height is functional and works.
Can't wait to throw mine on.
a5m wroteTrue, it’s ironically more functional than my daily 😂. This is angle def hides the wheel gap, but when I mean lower, its probably no more than a quarter inch to close up the gap in the rear.Nah it looks good like that. As you said, functional but also aesthetically pleasing.
Can't wait to throw mine on.
danylo wroteThe rear? Gap seemed less in the rear compared to front? Maybe it's just the angle or the surface not being level where you're parked.True, it’s ironically more functional than my daily 😂. This is angle def hides the wheel gap, but when I mean lower, its probably no more than a quarter inch to close up the gap in the rear.
I know what you mean though. Certain times the drop looks perfect and other times we want it lower. I'd keep it within the range of the Ohlins or I think you'll be sacrificing ride quality. That's paramount for me.
a5m wroteIt’s definitely the photo, but I believe these cars give the reverse rake appearance even when both front and rear jackpoint clearances are equal, so even with it lowered to what I ideally want, theres gonna be a larger gap up front than the rear, but I think im only gonna go 1/5th of an inch, nothing crazy. Got plenty of room in the ohlins 😁The rear? Gap seemed less in the rear compared to front? Maybe it's just the angle or the surface not being level where you're parked.
I know what you mean though. Certain times the drop looks perfect and other times we want it lower. I'd keep it within the range of the Ohlins or I think you'll be sacrificing ride quality. That's paramount for me.
a5m wroteHere’s a photo for perspectiveThe rear? Gap seemed less in the rear compared to front? Maybe it's just the angle or the surface not being level where you're parked.
I know what you mean though. Certain times the drop looks perfect and other times we want it lower. I'd keep it within the range of the Ohlins or I think you'll be sacrificing ride quality. That's paramount for me.
danylo wroteThat looks like there's a reverse rake already, so lowering the rear more will exacerbate it.Here’s a photo for perspective
Are you leaving the front alone?
a5m wroteDefinitely symmetrically lower. Ill post to here again once I refresh the height.That looks like there's a reverse rake already, so lowering the rear more will exacerbate it.
Are you leaving the front alone?
Narvin wroteWhat model is this? Looks great.My jet black on black
10.5 square 285/30
Hey I’m looking for some insight. My friend is offering me a set of bbs Ch-r , staggered set 19x8x40 and 19x9x44. Would 255/35/19 and 275/35/19 fit ? And would that set fit (I’m guessing with spacers) work on a e93 m3. TIA.
19” Racepocket e88. Much nicer than I expected.
danylo wroteThis looks amazing - mind sharing the specs on them?19” Racepocket e88. Much nicer than I expected.
Sco Cuddie wrote19x10 +15This looks amazing - mind sharing the specs on them?
19x10.5 +21
255/35
285/30 (or 35 sidewall, can’t remember)
RE-71RS
Very nice
Joe87 wroteNo, don't. Not wide enough and too shallow of offsets. But stock tires 245/265 would fit well enough. Normal size for 8" & 9" historically from BMW would be more like 225/255.Hey I’m looking for some insight. My friend is offering me a set of bbs Ch-r , staggered set 19x8x40 and 19x9x44. Would 255/35/19 and 275/35/19 fit ? And would that set fit (I’m guessing with spacers) work on a e93 m3. TIA.

