So I sold my mustang GT for an E92. An e92 has been a dream car for years, but I took a detour, modifying my track prepped mustang.
Key improvements are chassis. Steering is more responsive. My mustang had track shocks and struts, and the M3 bone stock can be pushed far more in the corners. The mustang is also just a larger car, and the weight is fairly apparent on track. It is also a pretty numb car. Steering is not very responsive, and the suspension doesn’t communicate very well either.
The point of overlap is in the engines. The s65 feels like a 5 liter coyote in a tuxedo. The 5.0 is more raw, and has an interesting high pitch tone with corsa mufflers. It felt like an s65 with torque. Bone stock, straight line performance is similar, but the mustang has more potential N/A. Both engines rev above 8,000 rpm too.
The Achilles heel of the mustang, and a factor that made me sell it, is the MT82. It’s not a bad shifting transmission, and the clutch feel is fine. The problem is you need a new clutch to enjoy high revs without getting lockout. After you get a clutch, it feels amazing. Durability is an issue after this, and transmission swaps get common when these cars are driven hard.
The M3 DCT is superior here, and miles ahead of the automatic mustang offerings. It feels mechanical, has customization, and shifts instantly. I had some manual transmission fatigue, and wanted to try something new. I’m similarly eager to compare my track times with a DCT.
Overall I think the s550 stacks up well to the e92, delivering a high revving V8 experience at great value. From there it’s a blank canvas to build. The e92 feels like a comprehensive package out the box. Sure it could use more torque, but I’d argue the chassis balance and excellent feel compensates for this.
Now technically if you compare cars by MSRP, the gt350 is the natural comparison. They’re great cars, but I didn’t feel a strong draw to own another mustang.
Key improvements are chassis. Steering is more responsive. My mustang had track shocks and struts, and the M3 bone stock can be pushed far more in the corners. The mustang is also just a larger car, and the weight is fairly apparent on track. It is also a pretty numb car. Steering is not very responsive, and the suspension doesn’t communicate very well either.
The point of overlap is in the engines. The s65 feels like a 5 liter coyote in a tuxedo. The 5.0 is more raw, and has an interesting high pitch tone with corsa mufflers. It felt like an s65 with torque. Bone stock, straight line performance is similar, but the mustang has more potential N/A. Both engines rev above 8,000 rpm too.
The Achilles heel of the mustang, and a factor that made me sell it, is the MT82. It’s not a bad shifting transmission, and the clutch feel is fine. The problem is you need a new clutch to enjoy high revs without getting lockout. After you get a clutch, it feels amazing. Durability is an issue after this, and transmission swaps get common when these cars are driven hard.
The M3 DCT is superior here, and miles ahead of the automatic mustang offerings. It feels mechanical, has customization, and shifts instantly. I had some manual transmission fatigue, and wanted to try something new. I’m similarly eager to compare my track times with a DCT.
Overall I think the s550 stacks up well to the e92, delivering a high revving V8 experience at great value. From there it’s a blank canvas to build. The e92 feels like a comprehensive package out the box. Sure it could use more torque, but I’d argue the chassis balance and excellent feel compensates for this.
Now technically if you compare cars by MSRP, the gt350 is the natural comparison. They’re great cars, but I didn’t feel a strong draw to own another mustang.