|
|
|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
09-14-2012, 09:27 PM | #23 | |
Second Lieutenant
68
Rep 244
Posts |
Quote:
I see your point but you have to be realistic. If you're driving on city streets in 30 MPH zones and/or in traffic then you just can't ALWAYS shift past 4,500. My point here is that you need to get over 2,500 to start to feel the power and the E46 seems like it has more low-end power (ie. up to 2,500), which might be more fun/suitable for those types of driving conditions. That being said, there is absolutely NO doubt that the E93 is in a WHOLE different category (ie. much better power!) once you're beyond 2,500. It's like day and night after that point... The problem is that there are some driving conditions that simply don't allow you to get to the 2,500 range where the E93 engine really wants you to be... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-14-2012, 09:53 PM | #24 |
Second Lieutenant
68
Rep 244
Posts |
Thanks to everyone for their additional thoughts. Here are some answers to some questions - I will absolutely follow up AFTER the break-in period to make sure that I'm give a fair comparison.
- I had a stock suspension so I can't give you a comparison with coilovers - sorry. - Here's some good market data for everyone: I actually used to work at Toyota HQ and GM HQ so I have access to the national Manheim auction sales. My car was worth about $24k based on recent West auction sales. CarMax offered me $22k and I got $24k from my BMW dealer so I sold it the dealer. They did NOT roll any profit into my lease - I paid the base BMWFS MF and I bought my new car for $1k over invoice. My car had 500 miles left on the countdown to Inspection II, so I suspect CarMax docked me $1.5-$2k for that. The only work that was needed on my car was 1 wheel minor scrape repair. Otherwise my car was honestly ridiculously mint. It had been garaged the entire time - even when I went to lunch - and my Michelin Super Sports were probably still 50-75% ok. My car stickered for over $67k - EVERY option available, including the factory installed alarm. And BTW - I am leaving the dealer's name anonymous here because I have a very contact there who did me a favor on the trade-in and purchase price so if you ask I just can't tell :-) - Good point about going 80 MPH with the understeer and suspension. I don't miss my E46's suspension at all - it was just too harsh for DD. But I do wish I had better road feel on the E93! Feel free to ask other questions - I am glad to help. But I will be back to report on things after the BI period for sure... |
Appreciate
0
|
09-16-2012, 08:08 AM | #27 |
Lieutenant Colonel
65
Rep 1,705
Posts |
My car has around 4000 miles and it seems to drive better every time I drive it. The engine will get stronger, not to mention the additional 3400 RPM Also, your tires and brakes will be fully broken in. I wrote a similar review when I switched from my modded (mostly chassis, but some power upgrades) 335i. At this point, it is not even close. Plus, when you get used to the steering feel (seems better than when I bought it), that differance will fade and everything else will shine!
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-16-2012, 09:29 AM | #28 |
Colonel
1097
Rep 2,286
Posts |
Although I cannot objectively verify it - I believe the engine definitely seems stronger as you add miles - I remember at 20k miles thinking to myself "wow - this engine seems even better now than at 5k". Now I'm at about 53k - took it for drive this morning and had a few full throttle blasts with redline shifts 1-2 and 2-3 - I swear the engine seems even marginally better now than before (although I just had fuel induction service done and outside air temp was only 45-50 - so these surely played at least some role). Either way - over 50k miles an my S65 still pulls like crazy (bone stock)
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-16-2012, 12:48 PM | #29 | |
Second Lieutenant
68
Rep 244
Posts |
Quote:
Thanks very much - it's great to know someone wrote a similar review. I'm seriously considering doing an axle back exhaust mod so I can hear a little more noise on the low-end to feel a little more involvement. But, at this point, it's clear that I need to give it some time, as that seems like unanimous advice for the board members. Hopefully I will see some improvement on the low end with time + a potential minor exhaust mod. I'm considering the M Performance Exhaust and possibly the Eisenmann Sport Exhaust. A board member was nice enough to let me hear the MPE in-person so I'm hoping to check it out later this week. Thanks again, Jeremy |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-16-2012, 06:34 PM | #30 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
65
Rep 1,705
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-17-2012, 11:44 AM | #31 | |
Colonel
350
Rep 2,937
Posts
Drives: 2013 Estoril 328i M Sport
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
|
Have you heard the Eisenmann Race in person? Beautiful sounding exhaust without being too obnoxious. If you'd like you can hear it on my car some time.
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-17-2012, 12:19 PM | #32 |
Second Lieutenant
68
Rep 244
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-17-2012, 01:36 PM | #33 | |||
Brigadier General
594
Rep 4,488
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
To your larger point though, I find Sport Plus almost undrivable. Sport is my setting of choice for casual driving because you're right that the car feels more engaging even when you're driving lazily that way, and that's nice in casual settings. But as I've gotten better on the track I've realized that Normal is the proper setting for real driving, and I now use that both on-track and for fun driving on back roads. A linear, more precise throttle is far more important to being smooth (and thus fast) than a punchy throttle. It took me a year to figure that out, but now that I have, Sport doesn't feel right to me when I'm really out to drive, and Normal feels sublime. There's something magic about the engine revs creeping just a bit higher as you move your foot just a bit deeper through a turn, which is what makes Normal actually feel MORE engaging to me in that context, whereas Sport just doesn't allow that level of refined control. I'm guessing you haven't been to the track before? I'd recommend trying Normal on spirited driving consistently for a while. Just train yourself to have a slightly heavier foot in those contexts and you should eradicate the sluggishness you see but retain precision control. Of course being past the break-in when you'll be able to drive without ever being anywhere near those low RPMs would make Normal's sluggishness a non-issue too.... Quote:
That said, yes the brakes can be a weak point of the car, but because they overheat relatively easily on the track. That's solved with upgrading the stock pads, and you'll also want to have upgraded the fluid by then -- but that also has nothing to do with what you've observed. Congrats on your purchase though, enjoy the car!
__________________
'16 Cayman GT4 (delivery pics, comparison to E92 M3 write-up)
Gone but not forgotten: '11.75 M3 E92 Le Mans | Black Nov w/ Alum | 6MT (owned 5/2011 - 11/2015) Last edited by jphughan; 09-17-2012 at 04:07 PM.. |
|||
Appreciate
0
|
09-17-2012, 09:50 PM | #34 | |
Second Lieutenant
68
Rep 244
Posts |
Quote:
Thanks for all of the info. Your point about driving in Normal is good advice, as I agree it's clearly the most controlled/linear. So far I have tried backing off of Sport Plus in favor of sport, with some driving in Normal. At this point I'm going to have to ween off of both Sport Plus and Sport, as I have gotten accustomed to them - like a drug addict! But I am going to give it a shot, as I can see it paying off in the long run as you suggested. For now I'm scheduled to hear the MPE on Thurs, as that might be exactly what I need. I'm excited by the prospects, as I pretty much like most other things about the car. Thanks again for your help. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-28-2012, 10:02 PM | #35 |
Second Lieutenant
68
Rep 244
Posts |
Ok - so I'm still in my break-in period (at around 700 miles now) and I'm going to wait until after my 1,200 mile service before writing a complete follow up of my impressions of my E93. That being said, I came across this video in another thread and I thought it communicates my feeling about the E93 thus far, in that newer technology doesn't necessarily make for a more fun drive. I will post a further update in 1-2 months (when I finish my oil service). In the meantime, enjoy this great video with Chris Harris:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=8h_IcLn4JSg |
Appreciate
0
|
10-29-2012, 08:15 PM | #36 |
Private First Class
105
Rep 125
Posts |
Sold my second E46 and bought a 2010 E92 a couple of months ago. Good comparison, but man oh man... You seriously have not seen anything yet with the E65. Wow.
Can't wait to hear your thoughts after break-in. Life begins north of 5k with this motor, IMO.
__________________
2003 SGM SMG - Sold but not forgotten!
2010 JzB/DCT Moved on to next owner 2019 HS 6MT M2C |
Appreciate
0
|
12-27-2012, 10:23 PM | #37 | |
Second Lieutenant
68
Rep 244
Posts |
UPDATE - Impressions 4 Months Later...
(See below for my original post if you want to compare it to this update)
So I have had my '13 E93 M3 for over 4 months now and, while I only have around 1,300 miles on the odometer, I think it's an appropriate time to post a follow up of my impressions, as I have had the car long enough now to give everyone an update and I know people have been waiting for my further impressions. I actually drive the car every day but I typically only go a total of 5-10 miles. I hope everything below is helpful for those considering going from E46 M3 Convertible to an E93 M3 Convertible. For what it's worth, I have driven MANY cars over the years and I actually worked at Toyota Headquarters and GM Headquarters, so I have a lot of experience when it comes to driving, feel, etc. UPDATE - Overall Impressions - 4 months later and I just had my 1,200 mile service done 3 weeks ago. I can now say that I really like the car but ONLY for 1 reason: I performed an OEM Exhaust Mod (non-perforated pipes) 2 weeks ago and that literally changed my opinion from not liking the driving experience that much to really liking the driving experience and enjoying every minute with it, which is really how it should be. The additional exhaust noise up to 3k RPMs is EXACTLY what I needed to feel connected to the car. I can now hear all of the rev notes of the engine and really feel like I am driving it, whereas before it was so quiet that it almost felt like I was driving a refined Lexus, at least compared to the E46 M3 Convertible with the soft top. I am no longer complaining about the car not being "raw" enough, as the exhaust mod cleared that up. The OEM Exhaust Mod is not for everyone, especially for those considering a convertible, so be sure to consider the Pros/Cons before going ahead with the mod. Here's my thread that discusses the Pros/Cons of the OEM Exhaust Mod (non-perforated) for convertibles: http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=783957. - While I now really like the car, thanks solely to the OEM Exhaust Mod, there are still some aspects that are clearly better in the E46 M3 Convertible, including the steering feel and general "feeling connected to the road + feedback". This car just isn't as precise as my old E46 M3 Convertible. It's not bad but it's just not great. Many others seem to be ok with the steering on this car so perhaps it's just me or perhaps it's because the steering on the E46 M3 Convertible was just so good! - It's really nice to have an entire step up terms of interior refinement and quality compared to the E46 M3 Convertible. The iDrive is very easy to use and the materials are definitely a good notch up. You notice it as soon as you sit in the E93 and it's a nice plus. - OVERALL - I would say that with the new OEM Exhaust Mod I now like the car as much as the E46 M3 Convertible. Do I think it's the better total driver's package of the 2? No, as it isn't as precise, as light, or as connected as the E46 M3 Convertible. But it's MUCH faster, the exhaust note is now exotic and fantastic, and it's a great driving experience. If you want the old school M car that is lighter, more raw, more connected, and less refined, then clearly the E46 M3 Convertible is the winner. If you want the faster, more refined, and still fun to drive car, then the E93 M3 Convertible is the winner BUT ONLY if you modify the exhaust. If the E93 was lighter and had better tuned steering then I would probably like it a lot more and I would be happier with it. If I didn't modify my exhaust then I suspect the E46 M3 Convertible would be my hands down winner... It's worth noting that all of my E46 M3 Convertible (3 total - 1 manual and 2 SMG) were stock and I have never modified a car before. Pros of E93 M3 Convertible (with OEM Exhaust Mod) vs E46 M3 Convertible (stock) - Much faster (very big difference - feels like a good second quicker 0-60) - Car is as fun to drive with OEM Exhaust Mod as E46 M3 Convertible and has a MUCH better exhaust tone/note - It sounds exotic! - Adjustable suspension makes longer commutes easier than the harsh E46 M3 Convertible suspension - DCT is a better experience once you get used to it (and I used to love SMG) - Interior is a big step up in terms of refinement - iDrive is easy to use and has a great screen in the sun - Fantastic downshift "blips" when in S4 or S5 (if you're in the right mood!) - Premium stereo is a notch up compared to the Harmon Kardon system in the E46 M3 Convertible - Keyless Entry (doors/trunk) is a nice feature that I never knew I would like until I had it - Reduced noise on highway thanks to hard top is nice on longer trips Cons of E93 M3 Convertible (with OEM Exhaust Mod) vs E46 M3 Convertible (stock) - DCT is harder to engage in first (requires a little pedal modulation vs SMG's more fluid launch) - Steering isn't as precise and the additional weight can be felt on hard turns - Engine doesn't rev as freely as my E46 M3 Convertible - it's more restricted. And it's a LOT more restricted than a non-broken in M6 coupe (2013) that I recently tried. - Doesn't feel as connected to the road - Additional weight definitely has a negative impact on the overall driving experience compared to the E46 M3 Convertible - Turning radius is much worse (minor point but is annoying at times) - Trunk space/design is a joke with roof down and access to items in trunk with latch down is horrible - The modified exhaust is definitely a little loud with the roof down, which is why I'm not sure the mod is suitable for everyone. See my thread for more details/thoughts: http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=783957 - My previous M3s had Michelins - I now have Continentals. The Contis suck! I realize this is the luck of the draw but it's still worth noting... All I cay say is boy I am glad the OEM Exhaust Mod exists, as it turned my upgrade to the E93 from disappointing to very happy. It cost me $350 (which I understand is on the high side) and I can't imagine spending better money on this car. I fully understand why everyone is so happy with the mod. You absolutely need to experience it in-person if you're considering it. As you can see, the E93 is not a clear winner so it's important to consider all aspects before making the leap. I think an extended test drive is a good bet, as the car hasn't grown on me over time, with the exception of the OEM Exhaust Mod. I'm glad I like the car a LOT more than before the OEM Exhaust Mod and I hope this update is helpful. Feel free to ask questions, as I'm glad to help. Happy Holidays, Jeremy Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-27-2012, 10:39 PM | #38 | |
Private First Class
9
Rep 179
Posts |
Quote:
Making this post before going above 5k rpm is like discussing your favorite things about women before you've had sex.
__________________
2008 Melbourne Red vert, 6 MT
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-27-2012, 11:05 PM | #39 |
Major
153
Rep 1,052
Posts
Drives: 2022 X3MC; 2012 M3 Cabriolet
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
|
I'm not exactly sure, but somewhere around 6,000 miles the exhaust sound became more throaty on my E93. I had thought about getting a mod, but now am glad that I waited. It's loud enough for a daily driver -- I don't want it to sound like a Harley-Davidson with open pipes.
__________________
2022 ///X3M Competition; São Paulo Yellow
2012 ///M3 Cabriolet; Le Mans Blue Metallic. >177k miles and still rocks! |
Appreciate
0
|
12-28-2012, 02:23 AM | #41 |
Lieutenant
20
Rep 532
Posts |
k
__________________
300 / ZSP / ZPP / ZCV / PDC / OEM M3 Mirrors (auto everything) / LCI Tails / Paddle Shifters / MTechnik Sides, Front & Rear Bumper / OEM M Spoiler, Performance Grilles / Quad Tips & Carbon Fibre Quad Diffuser (Pending) / AC Schnitzer Roof Spoiler / OEM Aluminum Footrest, Stainless Pedals (Pending) / Keyhole Delete / Euro Fog Switch (Pending) / All Weather Mats & Liner /
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-28-2012, 10:17 AM | #42 |
Colonel
344
Rep 2,928
Posts
Drives: 328i, 335i, M3, 535i, X5, 36M
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: OC
iTrader: (3)
Garage List 2014 Ford Raptor [0.00]
2012 328i E92 [10.00] 2013 X5 [0.00] 2013 335i F30 [8.00] 1990 Toyota Previa [0.00] 1997 E36 M3 [10.00] 2011 E92 M3 [0.00] 2011 535i [0.00] |
I drove a 46m vert and it felt way more loose and disconnected than the e92. It was sloppy over corners and had far greater body roll IMO. Maybe because it had double the mileage of yours but anyway grats
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-28-2012, 12:32 PM | #43 | |
Second Lieutenant
68
Rep 244
Posts |
Quote:
Agreed. Although I still prefer the E46 above 5k RPMs vs the E93 - not sure why. I actually think it has to do with the exhaust, as it's strange that the E93 gets quieter (the exhaust does) above 4k RPMs. While it's nice to hear the engine noise at 6k on the E93, it's actually louder at 3k (at least with the OEM Exhaust Mod) so it's not quite as crazy as the E46, which was very linear. I also feel as though the E93 makes roughly the same noise between 4.5k to redline, while the E46 just keep progressing in tone. With the E46, it sounded like you were at redline at 5k RPMs but then the car would just keep going and made a pitch that you didn't think was possible! With the E93 it seems to make a similar pitch up to redline, which is less of a thrill for me. Not to say that redline on the E93 isn't thrilling |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-28-2012, 12:34 PM | #44 | |
Second Lieutenant
68
Rep 244
Posts |
Quote:
I do agree that the E46 can feel "sloppy" around corners as it ages, but I will see that the steering precision remains spot on. My E93 just feels too heavy around corners and when you add the fact that the steering isn't as precise then I would still choose the precision of the E46 for cornering vs the more stiff but less precise E93. I guess it's just subjective, which is why trying both cars is critical, as everyone will probably have a different opinion... Last edited by jeremyr4; 12-30-2012 at 01:09 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|