|
|
11-16-2009, 10:31 PM | #1 |
First Lieutenant
99
Rep 346
Posts |
Honda Civic si Mugen vs 2010 GTI vs MKV R32
Which one would you choose and why? This is the list ive pretty much narrowed it down too because all can be had for about mid $3's a month. Wether it be financing, lease assumption etc. Im also open to suggestions if anyone has any.
|
11-16-2009, 10:40 PM | #2 |
Lieutenant General
1204
Rep 12,446
Posts |
I'd take the R32.
I'm not a fan of the Civic Si's design. The proportions aren't athletic at all. FWD = Wrong wheel drive. It lacks torque. I HATE the interior (fyi, I used to own an '06 EX Coupe) with its stupid digital readout. The brakes are subpar. It's a Civic. The list can go on. The R32 at least has some grunt and AWD to boot. Not to mention you can find some tasteful mods for the MkV body style. And the interior is LEAGUES better. The seats aren't even comparable.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
11-16-2009, 10:41 PM | #3 |
Lieutenant Colonel
207
Rep 1,699
Posts |
IMO, there isn't much of a performance difference betwen the base civic SI and the mugen version. I would definately look at the civic si. I would drive both to see what you would prefer.
__________________
Current: 10' E90 Jerez M3 DCT
///Mods: Xpel front clip wrap, Nokya 2500k H8 halos, matte grills, IND reflectors, scoops, MS drop-in, MS track pipes, Dinan exhaust, 240E, ESS tune, BBS CHR, s04 255x35 295x30, KW Clubsports, ceramic pads Retired: 08' E92 328i JB 6mt 212 rwhp 190 rwtq |
Appreciate
0
|
11-16-2009, 10:54 PM | #4 |
First Lieutenant
99
Rep 346
Posts |
Yeah. Im sure the performance difference is minimal. But it looks so much better . As for the r32. It definitely has more refinement, but i REALLY cant stand automatic. Ive had 2 automatic cars in a row and i cant take it anymore. So boring to drive. I really think that i may have to stop being a cheapo and look at cars that cost a few more bux a month because i'm really not gravy about any of these 3 . For the past 5 months Ive been picking my brain like crazy of wtf to get. I can pick up a lightly used c6 Vette for 500 a month. Or maybe an old z06 for about the same. But the problem there is no warranty. So looks like im back to square 1 of being clueless
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2009, 02:42 AM | #5 |
Major General
1207
Rep 8,034
Posts |
The VW cars are the only way forward, but choosing between them is much more difficult.
I've spent a lot of time behind the wheel of both cars and I would personally pick the Mk6 GTI for a number of reasons. It's got handling that feels more alive in your hands, it's every bit as quick (trust me), it's options are more luxurious and it feels as if it's from a higher price level that's more equal to an Audi or a BMW. The extremely economical, mid thirties is easily achievable and it's got cult status and heritage that the R32 doesn't quite have yet. If you pick the R32 instead then I can easily understand why, it's a V6 with a sweeter note, fuel prices aren't UK standards yet and it's bodykit is equally as good with arguably the better looking alloys. Also AWD means that if you did tune it the chassis could easily cope with the power that much better, but in stock form it's no quicker. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2009, 05:04 AM | #6 |
Awesome & Likes Cookies
43
Rep 391
Posts |
Genesis Coupe if you can get past driving a Hyundai. RWD, turbo, LSD, Brembos, manual, 19" alloys, ridiculous amount of lux features for low $20s.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2009, 08:55 AM | #7 |
Banned
79
Rep 5,970
Posts |
I'd take that over any of the other options for sure. Honestly though, in this price range, I'd probably go for a Mustang GT. It's the bang for the buck winner, and the aftermarket is so huge it makes them pretty cost effective to modify.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2009, 09:09 AM | #8 | |
Major General
1207
Rep 8,034
Posts |
Quote:
Another thing that seem to be more common in the US is modifying cars instead of leaving them stock as is more common here, this actually surprises me considering most cars are leased. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2009, 10:44 AM | #9 |
Lieutenant General
2387
Rep 12,635
Posts
Drives: Z4 M, X5, GX460
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CT
iTrader: (100)
Garage List E86 Z4 M [10.00]
F15 X5 xDrive35i [9.17] F10 550i (Retired) [9.17] F25 X3 xDrive35i (R ... [9.43] E82 135is (Retired) [9.53] E85 Z4 M (Retired) [9.41] E90 328i xDrive (Re ... [9.25] E86 Z4 3.0si (Retired) [8.93] |
how about hold out for the r20?
+1 on the genesis coupe |
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2009, 11:00 AM | #10 | |
Lieutenant General
1204
Rep 12,446
Posts |
Quote:
The noise the car makes is infinitely better than any of those turbo'd fours or N/A V6s though. It's also making near-identical performance numbers in comparison to the 335i, and that's including parameters other than accelaration.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2009, 11:01 AM | #11 | |
Banned
79
Rep 5,970
Posts |
Quote:
Translated, that means we value performance over interior luxuries in many cases, and I'd agree with you. Keep in mine that the person asking the question is in the US. It's a matter of personal preference though. I like a little bit of both, but at the same time, I'll take a hit on interior refinement for a significant increase in performance at the same price point. Vehicle ownership in the US most likely costs a lot less (when considering disposable income of the average buyer) than most of Europe, so that might explain why it's more common to modify them. We also have a more car oriented culture in general, with a lot of variety. Last edited by jeremyc74; 11-17-2009 at 12:43 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2009, 12:34 PM | #12 |
Brigadier General
303
Rep 4,479
Posts |
I think the Civic may have better reliability, but I don't think it otherwise compares well.
Why not a Mazda Speed3 or Mini S? I think those are much fun to drive than the Civic.
__________________
135i, SGM, Coral, Sport Package, Auto, Premium Hifi, USB/ipod, Apex EC-7s, PPK Stage II
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2009, 01:31 PM | #13 | |
Major General
1207
Rep 8,034
Posts |
Quote:
When you complain about FWD being the wrong driven wheels then I would expect that the handling of the chassis should be of equal importance. In fact I would much prefer a great handling chassis that's FWD instead of a poorly executed RWD chassis that can simply corner quickly. This is why I use the term 'cheap and cheerful', it not only it meant to explain the quality but the execution of the enginnering. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2009, 02:07 PM | #14 |
First Lieutenant
99
Rep 346
Posts |
I thought about Genesis coupe as well. But i really cant get past it being a Hyundai. I really am not a brand bitch boy. But ... Hyundai...I just cant do it. And as for the Mustang GT i really love the new one. But the payment would be closer to 500 a month. And knowing the new motor is only months away really would make me upset if i was to pick up a 2010 and spend all that money on the old outdated 4.6L. Ive also been tossing around the idea of a 135i, i dont mind the look of the car, but i have this certain Masculinity level i need to meet every month , and i think with a 135i i may feel a bit girly.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2009, 07:52 PM | #17 | |
Lieutenant General
2387
Rep 12,635
Posts
Drives: Z4 M, X5, GX460
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CT
iTrader: (100)
Garage List E86 Z4 M [10.00]
F15 X5 xDrive35i [9.17] F10 550i (Retired) [9.17] F25 X3 xDrive35i (R ... [9.43] E82 135is (Retired) [9.53] E85 Z4 M (Retired) [9.41] E90 328i xDrive (Re ... [9.25] E86 Z4 3.0si (Retired) [8.93] |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2009, 10:04 PM | #18 | |
Colonel
51
Rep 2,361
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-18-2009, 05:32 AM | #19 | |
Major General
1207
Rep 8,034
Posts |
Quote:
Come on, what more do you need as evidence. When the rest of the world dropped this like a hot potato Ford continued to use it on their mainstay bread and butter performance car. The cost involve to switch to independent rear suspension would have been small per car, given the numbers involved. Sadly this type of thing is evident throughout the US car industry, usually small saving to keep the products cheap but at the expense of quality or sophisticated engineering. Brute force can only take you so far, that's why I call the comment of 'Bang per buck' as 'Cheap and cheerful'. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-18-2009, 09:32 AM | #20 |
First Lieutenant
195
Rep 307
Posts |
The R32 is my first choice, however it isn't performance that does it for me on this one. The 2010 GTI is actually the best performer of the three, minor mods will net you significantly increased numbers on the dyno and it has been proven that even the 5th gen GTI out does the R32 with bolt ons.
R32 for it's exhaust note, 4 motion but not for the DSG... DSG = fail compared to the 6 speed.
__________________
gentle now the tender breeze blows, whispers through my Gran Torino, whistling another tired song, engine humms and bitter dreams grow, heart locked in a Gran Torino, it beats a lonely rhythm all night long
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-18-2009, 09:33 AM | #21 |
First Lieutenant
195
Rep 307
Posts |
And it still performs better...
Live rear or not.
__________________
gentle now the tender breeze blows, whispers through my Gran Torino, whistling another tired song, engine humms and bitter dreams grow, heart locked in a Gran Torino, it beats a lonely rhythm all night long
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-18-2009, 09:53 AM | #22 |
Major General
1207
Rep 8,034
Posts |
Well now you are talking about HP and size of rubber. If you honestly believe that the Mustang is sophisticated driver's car with incredible handling then I do need some of the stuff you are smoking..............no offence.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|