BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Wheels + Tires Sponsored by The Tire Rack
  TireRack

KEEP M3POST ALIVE BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER LINK!
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      03-10-2014, 02:08 PM   #1
UGADawgFan
Major
United_States
587
Rep
1,017
Posts

Drives: 991.1 GT3, B9 S4, E92 M3, G05
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Woodstock, GA

iTrader: (3)

Ideal front tire size for 19" Volk TE37SL with 295 rear

Hi All,

I've exhaustively been searching this for a couple weeks now and I can't come to a conclusion. Yes, I've read all of the threads that relate to front tire size.

My current set up is 19x9.5 +21, 19x10.5 +22 Volk TE37SLs on 265/35 and 295/30 Pilot Sport PS2's. My car is lowered on Swift Springs (a little less than an inch) I've got about two or three mountain runs left before the fronts are toast.

I know the 265/35 is too tall as I've been rubbing. The rear rubs as well on big bumps or if I'm fully loaded with fuel and passengers however it's not too bad.

I don't drive the car a ton (~4,500 miles over the past year, about 3,500 miles on the new wheels) so the fender liner isn't too beat up (yet).

My dilemma is this. I know everyone raves about the Michelin PSS and I love my PS2's but I'm not sure I want to spend $1600 on tires. They'll last me years with how little I drive it, but I was hoping to get S04 Pole Positions as they seem like the best price/performance combo. The car had brand new Hankook V12s when I bought it, but I didn't like the way they felt (a little soggy) so I don't want to go that route either. I do no track days just aggressive mountain driving occasionally with friends in the beautiful PNW. If I start doing track days, then I'll buy a set of dedicated wheels/tires.

So that leads to..what's the ideal tire size? I'm also limited in that a lot of manufacturers will make the front set, but not the rear set or vice versa.

I'm considering: 255/35 and 295/30 (S04's come in this size) but I'm wondering if the understeer will be way more pronounced with the big stagger.

265/30, 295/30- No S04 option, limited to PSS or Hankooks- will the front sidewall look "skinny"?

275/30, 295/30- Is rubbing an issue for front? Also no S04 option, limited to basically PSS, Falken 453, or Hankook's.

I'd appreciate the feedback all!
Appreciate 0
      03-10-2014, 03:25 PM   #2
slicer
Major General
slicer's Avatar
2738
Rep
6,734
Posts

Drives: 'E46 M3 Race Car, '23 X7
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wisconsin - Instagram - @slicer_m

iTrader: (39)

275/30/19 front and 295/30/19 rear is what I would run in either Michelin PSS or Yokohama AD08. You need to maximize your negative camber front and rear but it's well worth it. You will be able to eliminate any rubbing in the front but the rear needs et25 or more for no rubbing with a 295/30/19 on a 10.5" wheel.

See link for pictures of my car with the above listed tire sizes on 9.5" et 18 front (et23 wheel with a 5mm spacer) and 10.5" et25 rear wheels.

http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthr...light=volk+g25

__________________
'23 X7
'04 M3 - Fall Line Motorsports Built Race Car - S65 swap, Dry Sump, Bosch Stand-Alone ECU, Drenth Sequential Trans, MCS 3-Way, Flossmann Wide Body, Brembo Motorsports Brakes, Drexler LSD, BBS E88 Etc.
INSTAGRAM - @Slicer_M

Last edited by slicer; 03-10-2014 at 03:45 PM..
Appreciate 0
      03-10-2014, 03:31 PM   #3
info@trinityautosport
United_States
281
Rep
7,518
Posts

Drives: F13 M6
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Anaheim, CA

iTrader: (0)

Im on VRG2s 19x9.5 and 19x10.5, running on 275/30 and 295/30
Appreciate 0
      03-10-2014, 04:04 PM   #4
UGADawgFan
Major
United_States
587
Rep
1,017
Posts

Drives: 991.1 GT3, B9 S4, E92 M3, G05
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Woodstock, GA

iTrader: (3)

Thanks guys, and the 275/295 has no major adverse changes to handling?
Appreciate 0
      03-10-2014, 04:16 PM   #5
dparm
Stop the hate, get a V8
dparm's Avatar
United_States
3850
Rep
8,625
Posts

Drives: C7 Corvette GS, AMG C63 S
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Frisco, TX

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by UGADawgFan View Post
Thanks guys, and the 275/295 has no major adverse changes to handling?

Generally speaking, wider tires reduce steering feedback. It will feel sloppier as you go wider.

And of course, wider will be worse on wet pavement.
__________________
Now: 2017 Corvette Grand Sport, 2021 AMG C63 S sedan
Past: 2011.5 M3 sedan ZCP
Appreciate 0
      03-10-2014, 04:17 PM   #6
slicer
Major General
slicer's Avatar
2738
Rep
6,734
Posts

Drives: 'E46 M3 Race Car, '23 X7
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wisconsin - Instagram - @slicer_m

iTrader: (39)

Quote:
Originally Posted by UGADawgFan View Post
Thanks guys, and the 275/295 has no major adverse changes to handling?
The only negative is some additional tramlining when driving on uneven surfaces. Some prefer a more "square" tire sizing to get more neutral handling (275 front and rear or 275/285 combo). Some might also say they like the "lighter" feel of the narrower OEM tire sizes. Wider tires with wheels that are too narrow is not ideal; but as long as you have 9.5" or 10" front wheels then 275's are great. I don't like 275's on 9" or narrower wheels.

Every other thing I can say about running 275/295 is positive. I personally love the 275/295 combo and I have ran that along with 275/285. I first put 275's on the front of my M3 5 years ago and have never ran anything narrower since. I love the feel of the front end grip with 275's.
__________________
'23 X7
'04 M3 - Fall Line Motorsports Built Race Car - S65 swap, Dry Sump, Bosch Stand-Alone ECU, Drenth Sequential Trans, MCS 3-Way, Flossmann Wide Body, Brembo Motorsports Brakes, Drexler LSD, BBS E88 Etc.
INSTAGRAM - @Slicer_M
Appreciate 0
      03-10-2014, 05:48 PM   #7
s85e90
Brigadier General
192
Rep
3,633
Posts

Drives: black e90
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: everywhere

iTrader: (2)

Don't shoot me, but I still like the good ole 245/275 combo (stepped to 35 rear); 18s.

Everyone seems to rave about stuffing a 275 up front. I may look into it. Is the steering much heavier?
Appreciate 0
      03-12-2014, 11:12 AM   #8
Malek@MRF
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
Malek@MRF's Avatar
United_States
731
Rep
3,735
Posts


Drives: E92 M3, E46 M3, G82 M4
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Irvine, California

iTrader: (5)

275-30-19 front.
__________________
BMW PERFORMANCE SPECIALISTS. Race Engines. Suspension. F/I. Brakes. Race Preparation. Factory Service. Alignments.
OFFICIAL PARTNERS: KW. MOTON. Brembo. AP Racing. BBS Motorsport. iND. HRE. Turner Motorsport. VAC. BMW Motorsport.

Facebook | Instagram | Yelp! | Flikr
Phone: 949-233-0448 | E-Mail: info@mrfengineering.com
Appreciate 0
      03-13-2014, 09:20 PM   #9
rjd598
Banned
United_States
1770
Rep
6,696
Posts

Drives: F30 340i
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Diego,CA

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2016 BMW 340i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by s85e90 View Post
Don't shoot me, but I still like the good ole 245/275 combo (stepped to 35 rear); 18s.

Everyone seems to rave about stuffing a 275 up front. I may look into it. Is the steering much heavier?
i'm about to buy pss in 245/35/19 and 275/35/19. anyone else can comment on this size setup? sorry for the somewhat thread jack

Last edited by rjd598; 03-14-2014 at 06:55 PM..
Appreciate 0
      03-13-2014, 10:34 PM   #10
Someone?
Perception is King
Someone?'s Avatar
United_States
131
Rep
1,703
Posts

Drives: M4
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Michigan

iTrader: (8)

I did 255-35-19/ 275-35-19 in the PSS, not sure why you would want to go w/30 in back the 265-35 is 26.3 dia. the 275-35 is 26.6 dia. , but the 275-30 is way smaller at 25.6 dia.
You would have to go to at least a 295 to do the 30 which is 26 dia. and the 305-30 is the same as stock at 26.3 dia.
__________________
Perception and Reality are Two totally different Things.
Appreciate 0
      03-14-2014, 06:25 PM   #11
UGADawgFan
Major
United_States
587
Rep
1,017
Posts

Drives: 991.1 GT3, B9 S4, E92 M3, G05
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Woodstock, GA

iTrader: (3)

275 30 coming up guys- thanks for the help. I guess I'll have to suck it up and buy PSS. Hard to go to Hankook's after PS2's.
Appreciate 0
      03-14-2014, 06:55 PM   #12
rjd598
Banned
United_States
1770
Rep
6,696
Posts

Drives: F30 340i
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Diego,CA

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2016 BMW 340i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ibmike View Post
I did 255-35-19/ 275-35-19 in the PSS, not sure why you would want to go w/30 in back the 265-35 is 26.3 dia. the 275-35 is 26.6 dia. , but the 275-30 is way smaller at 25.6 dia.
You would have to go to at least a 295 to do the 30 which is 26 dia. and the 305-30 is the same as stock at 26.3 dia.
Quote:
Originally Posted by UGADawgFan View Post
275 30 coming up guys- thanks for the help. I guess I'll have to suck it up and buy PSS. Hard to go to Hankook's after PS2's.
so why is 275/30 bad? any issues with handling or performance?
Appreciate 0
      03-14-2014, 07:25 PM   #13
Malek@MRF
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
Malek@MRF's Avatar
United_States
731
Rep
3,735
Posts


Drives: E92 M3, E46 M3, G82 M4
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Irvine, California

iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rjd598 View Post
so why is 275/30 bad? any issues with handling or performance?

275/30/19 isn't bad, it's the correct size.

O.D. of 275/30/19 = 25.55"
O.D. of 245/35/19 = 25.8"
__________________
BMW PERFORMANCE SPECIALISTS. Race Engines. Suspension. F/I. Brakes. Race Preparation. Factory Service. Alignments.
OFFICIAL PARTNERS: KW. MOTON. Brembo. AP Racing. BBS Motorsport. iND. HRE. Turner Motorsport. VAC. BMW Motorsport.

Facebook | Instagram | Yelp! | Flikr
Phone: 949-233-0448 | E-Mail: info@mrfengineering.com
Appreciate 0
      03-14-2014, 07:37 PM   #14
rjd598
Banned
United_States
1770
Rep
6,696
Posts

Drives: F30 340i
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Diego,CA

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2016 BMW 340i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malek@MRF View Post
275/30/19 isn't bad, it's the correct size.

O.D. of 275/30/19 = 25.55"
O.D. of 245/35/19 = 25.8"
thanks malek! i didn't think it was "bad" necessarily it just didn't seem to get alot of love really. im picking up a used set of pss so obviously i don't have the option of choosing 275/35 which is much more common
Appreciate 0
      10-24-2018, 11:07 PM   #15
byroncheung
Lieutenant
United_States
178
Rep
591
Posts

Drives: e90 m3, 997.2 c2s, x166 GL450
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Westchester, NY

iTrader: (0)

contemplating getting te37 19x9.5 21 and 19x10.5 22... would OEM ZCP tires be too stretched on these rims? kinda don't want to go through the trouble of selling my existing tires and getting new ones (ultimately i want beefier tires but i'm hoping i can wait until i'm done with my existing tires)
Appreciate 0
      10-25-2018, 12:50 PM   #16
Richbot
Major General
2759
Rep
5,483
Posts

Drives: Jerez Black E90
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: STL

iTrader: (5)

I'm using 275/30-19 on 9.5" ET23's square right now, with a small rear spacer. My right front fender liner is touching by the bulge for the washer fluid reservoir, oddly more than the 285/40-17's I had on the car before. Maybe the squarer sidewall? Or maybe that liner is just done and literally can't even anymore. It's been througha lot. No rubbing on the left side.

Also, RE diameters:

Brand new 275/30-19 = 25.55 or whatever the spec is

245/35-19 = 25.8, when new. Take 4/32" of tread depth away (multiply by two because there's tread on both sides of the diameter) and suddenly the diameter is...wait for it...25.55"
__________________

Last edited by Richbot; 10-25-2018 at 01:00 PM..
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:40 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST