|
|
03-28-2024, 06:49 PM | #441 | |
Brigadier General
3900
Rep 4,165
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2024, 03:43 AM | #442 | |
New Member
0
Rep 5
Posts |
Quote:
So far ~400km the wear on the disc is even - on top side of the disc the lip/wear continues from the same spot that the original e92 m3 pads touched so ~1mm from top. On bottom side where the pad was cut they go over the disc little bit so no lip there anymore. With new pads i can use them as template to get correct size pads. I used G11 7 series 2017 non m brakes. (not painted calipers) 34116891275 34116891276 The M brakes on 7 series are bigger (the two cylinders on front of the caliper have some room). This video is very informative but misses the non painted calipers, exactly the same but not painted. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Yesterday, 01:51 PM | #443 |
How much is the Fish?
0
Rep 1
Posts |
Anyone using the CCB-Calipers of a Alfa on a E92 M3?
Didn't know there was a difference between the calipers used on the Steel vs. CCB version of that car. Steel LEFT | CCB RIGHT Currently have the FreakyParts calipers on-route, so i'm trying the CCB ones. But if that isn't possible with 18" wheels, i'm switching to Steel calipers. |
Appreciate
0
|
Today, 07:51 AM | #444 | |
Major General
2161
Rep 5,548
Posts |
Quote:
CCB calipers tend to be larger (deeper/thicker) to accommodate a pad with a longer radial depth and wider to accommodate the thicker CCB brake rotors. Do you know if there’s a pad available that matches the radial depth of the rotor surface being used and appropriate pad shape and thickness? CCBs tend to have much longer radial depths to help radiate heat. Do you know the piston sizes and have you calculated the piston areas/brake bias of stock vs Guilia calipers? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|