|
|
|
KEEP M3POST ALIVE BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER LINK! |
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
06-28-2012, 01:07 PM | #1 |
Colonel
336
Rep 2,940
Posts |
Switched from Contisport 3 to Michelin PSS in stock sizes
So I've been on the forum asking a zillion questions about wheels and tires. In the end, I just replaced my horrible Contisport 3 with stock sized Michelin PSS. I had actually even pre-ordered the new Apex EC7 wheel, but decided that since I had spent $2500 on the ZCP package in large part due to the wheels, that I wasn't ready to ditch them.
So here are the observations: 1. forget everything you think you might know about tire sizing. Even in the same numerical size, tires are sized very differently. The PSS are both wider, and slightly smaller in overall diameter than the Conti 3. The PSS therefore sits a little more flush with the fender, but increases fender gap by about an 1/8". 2. As the PSS is wider, I was warned about the possiblity of problems with spacers, even in stock size. I was running 12.5mm spacers F/R with my Conti 3, and am able to use them with no issues whatsoever with the PSS. So essentially, I am running a 19x9 ET19 wheel up front and a 19x10 ET13 wheel in the rear. No rubbing whatsoever with stock sized PSS. Tastefully aggressive look. 3.The ride is harsher than the Conti 3. Not significantly, but you do notice it. 4. The grip and turn-in are both far superior than the Conti 3. Night and day difference. My DSC used to come on all the time during even slightly aggressive driving, and now it does not. This was my biggest gripe and the problem is solved. In the end, I am happy I stayed with stock sizing and all the advantages it affords. PSS in stock sizes are light also. 23 lbs & 25 lbs (F/R). Overall, PSS in stock sizes are a great way to go.
__________________
Audi S6 * Audi S3 * Porsche Cayman GTS
--Former BMW M3 owner Last edited by LarThaL; 06-28-2012 at 04:34 PM.. |
06-28-2012, 02:05 PM | #3 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
1764
Rep 7,650
Posts |
Thanks for the review. Heard nothing but good things about the PSS.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2012, 06:23 PM | #4 |
Captain
333
Rep 687
Posts |
I just switched to PSS 255/275, love them all the way! I can really feel the extra grip on hard cornering, much better handling and ride too. Slightly bigger footprint is the way to go and well worth the upgrade imho!
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2012, 07:32 PM | #6 |
Brigadier General
1006
Rep 3,341
Posts |
I actually felt that running 255/35, 275/35 was a downgrade. I lost some torque and the handling just wasn't as crisp as stock. That's comparing PSS's.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2012, 08:16 PM | #7 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
307
Rep 13,093
Posts
Drives: BPMsport 2012 E92 M3
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Kansas
iTrader: (45)
Garage List 2013 Nissan GTR [0.00]
2019 Sierra Denali ... [0.00] 1999 Nissan Silvia [0.00] 1999 Nissan Skyline ... [0.00] 1998 Toyota Supra [0.00] |
Good to hear. I just picked up some and can't wait to try them out.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2012, 08:25 PM | #8 |
Banned
127
Rep 6,773
Posts |
+1 on PSS
OP there is a certain tradeoff between handling and comfort..you have a tire with a stiffer sidewall now which is better for handling..keep in mind it takes about 200 miles or so to bed in the tires..so expect them to settle into the car |
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2012, 09:40 PM | #9 |
Captain
333
Rep 687
Posts |
I guess everyone has their own impressions. Mine so far is that the slightly larger footprint provides greater handling crispness, feel and control, after all there is more tire on the road. As for torque, I would say if anything I feel more now rather than less, again perhaps due to slightly more tire on the road providing greater grip, etc.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2012, 10:02 PM | #10 | |
Brigadier General
1006
Rep 3,341
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2012, 10:20 PM | #11 |
Captain
333
Rep 687
Posts |
I purchased my '11 pre-owned with about 7,400 miles on it, so still had OEM Conti's Sport Contact 3. So obv there is an upgrade to the PSS from the Conti's. And I've only had the 255/275 setup for 24 hours lol, but so far I do like it. But then again anything would probably feel better than balding rear tire Conti's .
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2012, 10:34 PM | #12 |
Colonel
276
Rep 2,216
Posts
Drives: 991 GT3, Sold:'11 e92 M3 SG/FR
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Las Vegas/SoCal
|
Don't forget to follow the break-in period with new tires before you get on it. Takes a few hundred miles to wear through the release agent.
That being said, I'm still enjoying my PSS's that I bought over a year ago. I went with 255/275. Since the 220M's are 8.5/9.5 with 245/265 it only seems practical increase the tire size on the ZCP 359M 9/10 IMHO. Only regret is that they don't make a 285/30/19 yet.
__________________
991 GT3, Sold: '11 e92 M3 SG/FR ZCP|ZCV|ZP2|2MK|494|415|6NR|752
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2012, 10:38 PM | #13 | |
Brigadier General
1006
Rep 3,341
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2012, 10:40 PM | #14 |
E46 + E90 + F80
192
Rep 2,894
Posts
Drives: E46 + E90 + F80
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Illinois
|
I threw on the Michelin PSS on my E46 M3 earlier today. So far, I like them a lot with the very limited mileage. Despite how sticky people say it is, I am very impressed by how quiet and compliant they are!
__________________
F80 M3 DCT|Alpine White . Black Leather | My Build Thread
E90 M3 DCT|Melbourne Red . Speed Cloth | My Build Thread E46 M3 6MT|Jet Black . Black Nappa Leather | My Build Thread |
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2012, 10:41 PM | #15 |
Banned
127
Rep 6,773
Posts |
Thats what makes them so good..you get the best of both worlds.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2012, 10:44 PM | #16 | |
Captain
333
Rep 687
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-29-2012, 09:41 PM | #17 | |
Colonel
336
Rep 2,940
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Audi S6 * Audi S3 * Porsche Cayman GTS
--Former BMW M3 owner |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-30-2012, 11:09 AM | #18 | |
Brigadier General
1006
Rep 3,341
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|