|
|
01-24-2012, 07:22 PM | #507 | |
Private First Class
38
Rep 199
Posts |
Quote:
What type of evidence would suffice to prove their kit caused this undoubtably? They have since removed the tune they installed. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 07:22 PM | #508 | |
Major
109
Rep 1,102
Posts |
Quote:
OP, I suggest legal action against AA with various forms of proof for your case if you would like more than what AA has already given you. Of course your case could very well be countersued at this point. The truth behind modding your vehicle. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 07:32 PM | #509 | |
First Lieutenant
18
Rep 356
Posts |
Quote:
If the tune was bad, it would result in a lean condition > detonation. But with meth spraying and you only being at 6000RPM when it happens, that REALLY doesn't make sense. In all likelyhood, you were just unlucky. Watch the video here: http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=635377 and read this: http://www.m3post.com/forums/showpos...8&postcount=50 In my personal opinion it's a bearing issue. The fact that it was Cylinder 5 isn't just chance. This could also be the reason someone may have said "it looks like a BMW issue" after you blew it and suggested you take it back to BMW. It may also explain why you dyno'd lower power even when you were stock and subsequently after you SC'd the car. Could AA have misdiagnosed the issue as an overrev not a bearing issue? Sure. But that STILL doesn't mean the SC caused it. I get it, you're upset... You got $16,000 back but you're still out of pocket. That's the game we all sign up for. Just curious - what's bringing you down to South Florida? Last edited by mattgold; 01-24-2012 at 07:37 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 07:33 PM | #510 | |
Brigadier General
915
Rep 3,456
Posts
Drives: Harrop E90 M3
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 07:38 PM | #511 |
Lieutenant
16
Rep 439
Posts |
[NEW FLASH M3POST.COM]
This has been the most informative stuff I have read on this forum in a while. Please Sticky this muthafuka. Conclusion: Mod at your own risk. If shit blows up; blame your desire to drive an M. [CASE CLOSED] |
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 07:42 PM | #512 | |
Captain
219
Rep 949
Posts |
Quote:
thats all. evidence...actual evidence would be real nice! As of now, you are saying its them without proving that it is from the s/c kit. Honestly, your problem easily could have happen bone stock and its just a coincidence that it happened while you had the charger on. I'm sorry that this has happened, but it has. It doesnt matter if you get legal advice or not, they have their disclaimer on their site. Simple as that! Good luck and by no means am i attacking you, just giving my opinion. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 07:55 PM | #513 |
General
21117
Rep 20,741
Posts
Drives: 2021 911 turbo
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Montreal
|
@ BMRLVR
If I remember correctly, you mentionned that the S65 was designed with bearing clearances on the tight side, especially true when significantly increasing engine power. In your opinion, could this be a cause for this specific engine failure? Was the rod that failed also farthest from the oil pump? Could it be a combination of factors that caused the failure (over rev weakening tie rod, tight bearing clearances + increased loads from SC) I understand it's difficult to draw any solid conclusions without analysing the actual hardware and data, but it's still fun speculating. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 08:02 PM | #514 |
cool beans
63
Rep 1,364
Posts |
I thought I'd chime in.
Regarding those who take statements made within the thread and construe them as fact, and constantly pick at pieces of text in order to support their own belief of what is true, simply because you've made the choice of who you want to believe, I ask you this. Put yourself in the position of those whom are being called upon. Based on the persistence and cooperation of the OP, I think his claim should be taken more seriously than a simple 'sorry bro, but you're dishonest' even though you're evaluation is based off of the opinions and interpretations of others. If the OP truly was driving the vehicle at a constant speed, and the engine did indeed give out, I would be at a loss for words, and I'm sure all of you would be as well. Most of you would have handled the situation the exact same way. Likewise, I'm sure Andrew is telling the truth, yet what he knows is only as credible as what he's seen and has been told. I wouldn't hold Active accountable at this point because the problem isn't clear, but do remember the associates who were present during the incident are no longer affiliated. This creates a hole in this scenario, due to the vital information that they carry. That in mind, the sheet that they produced did not seem to display data that coincided with BMW's evaluation. Point being, the notion of 'pay to play' and the constant finger pointing by members, who know nothing regarding who's at fault, is childish. If any of you were in the OP's position, and you knew that you were not responsible, you'd feel pretty helpless. If the OP is indeed telling the truth, the act of defending AA is fueling the fire of fraud. Likewise, if the OP is at fault, the harassment of AA is detrimental to their business and degrades their reputation, and so far they've received nothing but praise. Since none of you can decipher who's story is credible, I suggest you keep the finger pointing to a minimum, and keep the constructive efforts to uncover the truth at a maximum. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 09:14 PM | #515 | |
Grease Monkey
294
Rep 2,646
Posts
Drives: 2011 E90 M3,1994 Euro E36 M3/4
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada
|
Quote:
Was there an over rev at all??? Did the engine have a detonation issue??? To me looking at the exhaust valves on 3 out of 4 of the cylinders on the head that was shown in the picture, it sure looks like it was running lean and lean running is one of the things that causes detonation. The tight bearing clearances could have been a contributing factor but this engine had 20000+ miles without an issue so I doubt it was that. Here are my two best guesses of the cause of the failure: 1) If the car actually had an over rev, it weakened the connecting rod H-beam and/or stretched the big end and a little while later, it broke due to the damage. 2) The engine had a tuning issue. By looking at the pictures of the spark plugs and exhaust valves the engine was running lean. This lean running condition was putting excessive stress on the engine and after a while the engine succumbed to the stress the detonation was putting on it. This would explain why AA decided to change the tune for the Stage 2 kit, including lowering boost and making meth optional for the "Stage 2+" kit. A third but unlikely scenario is that the engine would have failed regardless of the if the AA kit was installed or not but I highly doubt that. Like I have said already, there are so many facts missing and holes in both parties' stories I am sure the truth will never be known. I bet Gintani is happy though, this thread came up and took all the heat off of their video thread!
__________________
Last edited by BMRLVR; 01-24-2012 at 09:36 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 09:21 PM | #516 |
4th down; 4th quarter? Renegade.
87
Rep 3,850
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 09:32 PM | #517 | |
Grease Monkey
294
Rep 2,646
Posts
Drives: 2011 E90 M3,1994 Euro E36 M3/4
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada
|
You have to follow the link in the original thread started a year ago........
http://www.ziptied.com/forums/index.php?topic=34449.45 It appears that the thread has been blocked and registration is currently disabled. Coincidence, I think not! Anyhow three out of the four plugs shown were white just like the exhaust valves in the cylinder head that is pictured. The black plug and corresponding black coloured exhaust valves are most likely from the cylinder with the failure and is a result of oil residue! EDIT: Found the photos of the plugs in post #20 Also of note, although it has already been posted, here is a quote from the other thread: Quote:
__________________
Last edited by BMRLVR; 01-24-2012 at 09:48 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 09:45 PM | #518 | |
4th down; 4th quarter? Renegade.
87
Rep 3,850
Posts |
Quote:
What you say of course makes sense. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 09:47 PM | #519 | |
First Lieutenant
4
Rep 350
Posts |
Quote:
I have seen what detonation can do, usually before it throws a rod, pistons shows signs, pitting, melting or broken rings/ring land. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 09:48 PM | #520 |
Banned
98
Rep 1,265
Posts
Drives: 1973 Jensen Interceptor
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Shanghai, People's Republic of China
|
Sounds similar to what happened to the op's engine.
http://www.bimmerfest.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=439844 I leased a new 2010 M3 coupe, and after only 500 miles, I suffered a broken rod and subsequent engine failure. I opted for the DCT instead of the manual transmission. I have not seen my car for over 11 weeks. A regional rep downloaded computer data, and it was determined that the engine failed due to an "RPM" issue. I have been unable to obtain any specifics and have tried, unsuccessfully, to get a copy of this data for review. The dealer will only say that the recommended 4500 RPM limit was exceeded. Nothing else was noted from the data. After 3-4 weeks, I was finally informed of the reason why the engineers felt the engine failed. A decision was made by BMW that the problem was not covered under warranty and would therefore not be repaired under warranty. I contacted a customer rep, and after over two months of waiting, a decision was finally made that the car would be repaired under "goodwill". I have previously leased an M3 convertible, 545 i and a 2008 335 xi coupe. Despite the fact that the car will be repaired, BMW has shown me that it is a classless operation. The company has shown no professionalism, and I have had to personally call multiple times and write multiple letters before something was finally done. It looks like the only reason they decided to repair my vehicle was because I have a track record with BMW. What if this M3 had been my first BMW lease/purchase? To not stand behind an M performance vehicle is outright embarrasing and weak. I have received no apologies from the company, and they have been frankly conceited and indifferent. I have loved the BMW brand until now. I will have to live with this vehicle for the next three years, but after that, BMW can go to hell. There are many other companies which certainly have more pride in their vehicles and turn out excellent products. I understand that automobiles are mechanical and that there is the chance of catastrophic failure, but I cannot accept that a company simply blames "RPMs" for a complete engine failure (especially with a DCT) without the consideration that the problem may have occurred on the assembly line or in the manufacturing of a part. If there is anyone reading this post who has any further information or knowledge of similar occurrences, I would love the hear from you. If there is anyone reading this post who is associated with BMW, a simple apology and explanation may change my mind concerning the company. Right now, I am mad as hell as my brand new vehicle has been sitting in a garage for almost three months while I have made three payments during that time. If BMW were to have shown more concern, I could have stomached the situation a lot better. I am a physician and have many coworkers who drive nice vehicles. After finding out about my situation, I know of 4 friends and coworkers who were previously considering an M3. Now, they are not only not considering an M3 but not considering BMW at all. This has occurred without me even making an active effort to voice my displeasure over the recent event. The Joy of Driving my ass- more like the ultimate nightmare! 03-10-2010, 04:51 PM adc BMW Fahrer Location: DC-MD-VA J |
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 09:57 PM | #521 | |
Grease Monkey
294
Rep 2,646
Posts
Drives: 2011 E90 M3,1994 Euro E36 M3/4
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada
|
Quote:
I only said that this was "possible" it was detonating and I am not saying it was a definite. By looking at a bunch of pictures no one can tell with any amount of certainty if this is the case. Either way, the engine does look like it was running a little lean. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 10:01 PM | #522 |
4th down; 4th quarter? Renegade.
87
Rep 3,850
Posts |
Totally. IMO - a good dealer knows that an M3 demo is going to get the crap kicked out of it. Plus there are plenty of dumb-asses out there who will do the wrong thing. This thing could have been a ticking time-bomb to begin with...
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 10:01 PM | #523 | |
Banned
98
Rep 1,265
Posts
Drives: 1973 Jensen Interceptor
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Shanghai, People's Republic of China
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 10:09 PM | #524 | |
Private First Class
38
Rep 199
Posts |
Quote:
As for it being a dealer demo, it was in fact the sales managers car at a reputable dealership who traded up for a 7 series. He didnt spark me as the type to abuse a car. With all that said, I have other important endeavors to attend and am once again out of town. I am currently in S. Florida, where I am planning to relocate. I will post up data findings when pulled from the DME on Monday/Tuesday when I am back in NC. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 10:09 PM | #525 | |
Grease Monkey
294
Rep 2,646
Posts
Drives: 2011 E90 M3,1994 Euro E36 M3/4
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada
|
Quote:
http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=569512 His was covered by warranty and he still has the car and everything is good. Engines do fail no matter how good they are or who builds them, but in a generally speaking sort of way, failures due to defects usually show up early in an engines' life! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 10:10 PM | #526 | |
4th down; 4th quarter? Renegade.
87
Rep 3,850
Posts |
Quote:
Seriously - sounds like a horrible situation with BMW in which they totally let you down. That sucks. But all engines have failure rates from every manufacturer. The fact that they told you it was an RPM issue without specific information is unacceptable and arrogant. There was a classic E46 engine failure case back on roadfly IIRC in which a guy who blew his E46 M3 engine took BMW to court and won. BMW introduced shadow memory evidence showing that the car had been abused. The customer's explanation was that it had been in so much for service, that no one could prove that it was actually the customer who had abused it. Ultimately this guy won and BMW replaced his engine. I don't believe the shadow memory logged the mileage at the time like it does now, but I could be mistaken. A tuner could probably confirm... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 10:12 PM | #527 |
First Lieutenant
4
Rep 350
Posts |
Assuming this is the one that threw a rod( judging by the exhaust valves not white). That cumbustion chamber and plugs looks too good to be detonation enough to throw a rod. Those spark plug tips should have been damaged at the least. Those pistons does not look like it was detonation, should atleast match the whiteness of the exhaust valves on the same area or slight whiteness in the middle where the plugs go. I do agree with you, that it looks like a bit lean. Just that I dont think it was enough to throw the rod. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2012, 10:13 PM | #528 | |
Major General
815
Rep 7,887
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Tags |
bmw m3, e90, fail, s65, supercharged |
|
|