|
|
06-28-2011, 10:35 PM | #1 |
Brigadier General
872
Rep 3,446
Posts |
ESS VT2 Update
While I’ve only had the kit installed for 4 months and about 6k miles, I feel compelled to provide an update for the benefit of anyone on the fence about getting a S/C. Do it. This kit continues to impress me every time I drive it, be it spirited or casual driving. It’s simply amazing how smoothly this car can put down roughly 600hp (although, to be fair, first gear can be described as nothing less than violent). I wouldn’t say that I’ve become desensitized to the power, because it still scares me every time I open the throttle, but I will say I was less than impressed when I drove a new 2011 C2S with PDK recently. It’s no surprise that it doesn’t have anywhere near the thrust of an ESS M3, but I looked at it more as what my M3 felt like pre-S/C. I suppose you could say that I was just surprised by how big the difference was. The C2S felt like it had a hamster wheel for a motor in comparison. I also hated the PDK in comparison to DCT.
Most importantly though, I’m amazed at the reliability of this kit. I’ve done 4 track days in the past 8 weeks (with at least 4 more on the docket for rest of the year), and I haven’t experienced the slightest hiccup or indication that I’m pushing the car too much. And I’ve really beaten on it hard. Most recently, I was at Autobahn CC on June 6 in 90+ degree heat (95 for most of the day and peaked at 97 degrees – a complete anomaly for this time of year). The oil temp held steady at the hash mark halfway between 210 and 300 and the water temp barely moved from 220 degrees all day (200 is where it usually hovers in normal driving). This is the most important part of the kit for me – I don’t ever want to have to take it easy on the car or feel like it’s compromised in any area. I don’t know if the credit here goes to ESS for building a kit with an effective cooling system or to BMW M for the S65’s impressive ability to dissipate heat, but in either case I’m happier than a pig in shit. I’ve driven stock M5’s and M6’s on the track on cooler days and received the overheat warning light, so the fact that a smaller motor that’s aftermarket modified to produce a higher output is more effective at keeping cool becomes quite impressive. I hope that anyone considering the ESS waits no longer. That is my only regret with this kit – should have done it sooner. |
06-28-2011, 10:43 PM | #2 |
Major General
1243
Rep 6,908
Posts |
Great write-up!
__________________
2022 Dravit/Fiona M3cx - Dinan midpipe w/VC, NW Carbonhaus CF, AST Springs, FC Spacers...more to come!
2016 Indi F80 M3 - SMB|Amaro | Mode Carbon | ESS | Akra EVO | KW HAS...SOLD 2012 MR e92 M3 DCT, ESS SC, Brembo BBK, BBS FI... GONE but not forgotten! 2008 AW e92 M3 6MT, ESS SC, BBS LM's...SOLD! |
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2011, 11:04 PM | #3 |
Brigadier General
501
Rep 4,033
Posts |
Agreed, it is an amazing kit.
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH |
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2011, 11:13 PM | #4 | |
389
Rep 3,149
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-29-2011, 10:06 PM | #7 |
The Jesal
391
Rep 5,859
Posts |
So glad i never been in a car that has it.
__________________
2009 E90 M3 - SOLD
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-29-2011, 10:53 PM | #8 |
Major General
1243
Rep 6,908
Posts |
You need to be....ASAP!
__________________
2022 Dravit/Fiona M3cx - Dinan midpipe w/VC, NW Carbonhaus CF, AST Springs, FC Spacers...more to come!
2016 Indi F80 M3 - SMB|Amaro | Mode Carbon | ESS | Akra EVO | KW HAS...SOLD 2012 MR e92 M3 DCT, ESS SC, Brembo BBK, BBS FI... GONE but not forgotten! 2008 AW e92 M3 6MT, ESS SC, BBS LM's...SOLD! |
Appreciate
0
|
06-30-2011, 02:10 AM | #9 |
1119
Rep 7,690
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-30-2011, 04:10 PM | #10 |
Major
430
Rep 1,286
Posts |
I'm interested in the response of the engine on the track. Is it just as linear and progressive as the stock motor, but just with more thrust?
Just curious as you are feeding power in out of the corners if the motor's response feels any different or more difficult to modulate. You seem to indicate not. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-01-2011, 09:11 AM | #11 | |
Brigadier General
872
Rep 3,446
Posts |
Quote:
having said that, with a 40% increase in power, you have to be more judicious with the throttle coming out of corners. it definitely takes some getting used to, but there's a lot more you can learn about throttle control when you have to feather it more gently. it's amazing to me that this motor can retain all of the throttle responsiveness with a blower. I drove an N54 car the other day (I had a 335 a couple years ago too), and the delay between throttle input and power delivery feels like a seriously long time coming from the S65. it's such a tragedy that BMW is scrapping the S65 in the upcoming M3; it's truly a gem. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-11-2011, 09:53 PM | #12 | |
///M Powered for Life
11421
Rep 10,296
Posts |
Quote:
In this case you have the additional advantage of having a centrifugal blower, which conserves the S65's extremely linear power delivery and simply gives you more of the good stuff at all times. The new turbo engine will be awesome in the way the new M5 is awesome. Yup, it'll be fast and efficient, but it will have lost the instant response and wonderful sound of the NA S65. Your car is breathtaking and I also thought the acceleration was 'enough'. Once you can't open the throttle all the way running 295 in the rear you know you have enough LOL. No need to get any more HP for any reason. Cheers |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-12-2011, 06:34 AM | #13 | |
Lieutenant General
5179
Rep 10,555
Posts |
Quote:
On the other hand, 2.75 psi does add significant power and on these high revving motors, you are often driving at 4000 rpm and up. And the metered boost of the centrifugal does match up well with the metered power of the low torque high rpm S65 to produce a gradual, straight line power delivery. A nicely done turbo system will spank a centrifugal because it will produce full boost in the midrange rather than the square root of full boost. Since that is the engine's natural torque peak, torque is way higher with a turbo. I first supercharged and then turbocharged my E36M3. Both systems were modded well past the typical stage 2 level. With the centrifugal, I made 16 psi peak boost at 7000 and about 4 psi at 3500 rpm, producing 463 rwhp and 368 lbs rwtq. With the turbo, I make 15 psi at 3100 rpm in 5th, 3300 rpm in 4th, 4000 rpm in 3rd, and wheelspin in 1st and 2nd before I hit 15 psi, and it makes around 500 rwhp and around 475 lbs rwtq. With the turbo, I am not waiting around for the power to arrive like I used to wait with the centrifugal. The fun is not all in the top 1/3 of the rpm curve. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-12-2011, 11:16 AM | #14 | |
First Lieutenant
31
Rep 344
Posts |
Quote:
Planning to get myself a ESS SC soon. What VT model is this? And are there any other mods apart from the SC? Dyno graphs? Well done dude! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-12-2011, 05:28 PM | #17 |
Lieutenant General
1265
Rep 17,493
Posts
Drives: like I'M BOUT THAT LIFE
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: PARADISE aka CANES COUNTRY
|
__________________
#datbimmerdoe #thatbimmertho
FOLLOW @datbimmerdoe on INSTAGRAM |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|