BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Engine, Transmission, Exhaust, Drivetrain, ECU Software Modifications
 
Mporium BMW
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      09-06-2013, 01:41 PM   #67
chris s
Major General
chris s's Avatar
1250
Rep
6,912
Posts

Drives: 2022 Dravit G80 M3
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New York

iTrader: (12)

i wonder if he'll back up his product if the motor blows?
__________________
2022 Dravit/Fiona M3cx - Dinan midpipe w/VC, NW Carbonhaus CF, AST Springs, FC Spacers...more to come!
2016 Indi F80 M3 - SMB|Amaro | Mode Carbon | ESS | Akra EVO | KW HAS...SOLD
2012 MR e92 M3 DCT, ESS SC, Brembo BBK, BBS FI... GONE but not forgotten!
2008 AW e92 M3 6MT, ESS SC, BBS LM's...SOLD!
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 01:42 PM   #68
Black Gold
Major General
592
Rep
5,396
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Texas

iTrader: (15)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DLSJ5 View Post
What are you talking about? Anyone can do whatever they want with their car, lol. You simply don't get it, my post was about an individuals behavior, conduct and ethics, cleary those are not important factors to you, but they are to me.
I fail to see what BPM did wrong by offering tuning on a used kit, and why they would be unable to do so.

please explain further on why you think this is wrong? what did the individual do wrong?

I personally would have gone with ESS simply because the risk would be lower, but I don't think BPM offering a tuning service is unethical. I previously had an ESS blower on my e46 and enjoyed it immensely, and have no experience with BPM nor have any plans to use their products or any software products on my m3, so no vested interest here.
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 01:43 PM   #69
happos2
Dingleberries
76
Rep
1,246
Posts

Drives: Gray E92 M3
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Indiana

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by KennyPowers View Post
thats a little extreme to say the least.

these companies are in competition. there is nothing wrong with providing a tune to a buyer of a used kit who requests this service.

why exactly does BPM (or anyone for that matter) owe ESS (or anyone from any kit) anything at all? ESS already made their money from selling the kit outright. So now they have a monopoly over anyone who wants to purchase the kit second hand? That's ridiculous and is completely out of line with what a free market is and is supposed to be.

__________________________________________________ __________

The tuner can offer whatever services they like, and the consumer is free to seek out whatever tune they like.

You cannot and should not control what people do with their money or cars. IMO your post is way off base and makes little sense.
I think I tried stating what you said....up until the line. After that, I can't argue with an opinion and I don't think that is what was being said.
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 01:44 PM   #70
DLSJ5
Brigadier General
DLSJ5's Avatar
United_States
503
Rep
4,033
Posts

Drives: 2016 F82 M4 ZCP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by KennyPowers View Post
umm not really at all

there is nothing wrong with a 3rd party software company like BPM or whoever tuning for a supercharger no matter what company sourced the parts (vortech blowers etc).

there is absolutely zero that is unethical about that at all, and I fail to see what is wrong with what BPM is offering.
If you built a product, that took a lot of money, time, and effort to make and that worked great and was proven, and someone else piggybacked on your hard work for attention and profit, you wouldn't have a problem with that? Fair enough, you should move to China then you'll fit right in.
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ
ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ
Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 01:46 PM   #71
chris s
Major General
chris s's Avatar
1250
Rep
6,912
Posts

Drives: 2022 Dravit G80 M3
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New York

iTrader: (12)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DLSJ5 View Post
If you built a product, that took a lot of money, time, and effort to make and that worked great and was proven, and someone else piggybacked on your hard work for attention and profit, you wouldn't have a problem with that? Fair enough, you should move to China then you'll fit right in.


Imagine ESS suddenly deciding to offer tunes for AA SC kits. Same concept, just not as bad b/c at least ESS has experience tuning SC'ed bmw's.
__________________
2022 Dravit/Fiona M3cx - Dinan midpipe w/VC, NW Carbonhaus CF, AST Springs, FC Spacers...more to come!
2016 Indi F80 M3 - SMB|Amaro | Mode Carbon | ESS | Akra EVO | KW HAS...SOLD
2012 MR e92 M3 DCT, ESS SC, Brembo BBK, BBS FI... GONE but not forgotten!
2008 AW e92 M3 6MT, ESS SC, BBS LM's...SOLD!
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 01:49 PM   #72
Black Gold
Major General
592
Rep
5,396
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Texas

iTrader: (15)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DLSJ5 View Post
If you built a product, that took a lot of money, time, and effort to make and that worked great and was proven, and someone else piggybacked on your hard work for attention and profit, you wouldn't have a problem with that? Fair enough, you should move to China then you'll fit right in.
they already sold the kit originally and made their money. this is a second hand product, which was resold. ESS and BPM both are software companies, and since the buyer already owns the hardware, why would it be unfair for another company to offer software for a used kit?

IMO the thought that BPM should not be allowed to compete with ESS or VF etc on software tuning a second hand hardware package is more indicative of anti-capitalist thought processes.

JMO. I think more vendors and more competition is a good thing and will improve products in the long run.
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 01:49 PM   #73
gatorfast
Major General
gatorfast's Avatar
United_States
4998
Rep
6,863
Posts

Drives: 718 Cayman
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SoFla

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris s View Post
And no....nothing wrong with benvo offering a tune for a kit he didn't design, develop, build or test! IMHO just kinda dumb on the consumers part, but JUSTTTT my opinion.
Well news for you - Benvo nor ESS for that matter designed, developed, built, or tested the M3 but they still offer tunes.

Sounds like some of you have some weird obsession/hatred towards BPM. If you dont like the products then dont buy them! No need to come on here bashing a product the OP clearly likes from a very reputable tuner/vendor.
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 01:51 PM   #74
chris s
Major General
chris s's Avatar
1250
Rep
6,912
Posts

Drives: 2022 Dravit G80 M3
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New York

iTrader: (12)

Quote:
Originally Posted by gatorfast View Post
Well news for you - Benvo nor ESS for that matter designed, developed, built, or tested the M3 but they still offer tunes.

Sounds like some of you have some weird obsession/hatred towards BPM. If you dont like the products then dont buy them! No need to come on here bashing a product the OP clearly likes from a very reputable tuner/vendor.

Umm no, you are correct, they're both aftermarket companies. Completely different discussion.

I have no obsession with bpm, good or bad. I do own an ess kit and believe in the product. Pretty sure i'm entitled to my opinion on the subject as well.
__________________
2022 Dravit/Fiona M3cx - Dinan midpipe w/VC, NW Carbonhaus CF, AST Springs, FC Spacers...more to come!
2016 Indi F80 M3 - SMB|Amaro | Mode Carbon | ESS | Akra EVO | KW HAS...SOLD
2012 MR e92 M3 DCT, ESS SC, Brembo BBK, BBS FI... GONE but not forgotten!
2008 AW e92 M3 6MT, ESS SC, BBS LM's...SOLD!
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 01:55 PM   #75
happos2
Dingleberries
76
Rep
1,246
Posts

Drives: Gray E92 M3
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Indiana

iTrader: (3)

Eh, these are all opinions...I doubt they are going to change.

I am going to start singing "Its a small world after all..."
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 01:56 PM   #76
DLSJ5
Brigadier General
DLSJ5's Avatar
United_States
503
Rep
4,033
Posts

Drives: 2016 F82 M4 ZCP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by gatorfast View Post
Well news for you - Benvo nor ESS for that matter designed, developed, built, or tested the M3 but they still offer tunes.

Sounds like some of you have some weird obsession/hatred towards BPM. If you dont like the products then dont buy them! No need to come on here bashing a product the OP clearly likes from a very reputable tuner/vendor.
Oh stop it with the hate crap, don't hate Benvo, tuning an NA motor vs. tuning a FI car are completely different things and stealing someone else's kit/hard work so you can test your tuning skills on FI is hardly reputable or a classy move. News for you, ESS DID build the kit, which is what we are talking about. No one has any hatred towards them they have common sense and can see through all of these recent tune threads and the nonsense, the dude has been banned from this site more than once, apparently he's not all that reputable in terms of his conduct.
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ
ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ
Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 01:59 PM   #77
astris
Major
617
Rep
1,154
Posts

Drives: M4 ZCP Individual Mintgruen
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Seattle

iTrader: (8)

So ethics aside, is anyone going to provide any actual information about the tune and numbers? Or are butt dynos and "trust me" statements now considered technical data?
__________________
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 02:00 PM   #78
Dave07997S
Brigadier General
723
Rep
3,965
Posts

Drives: 2020 Ford Mustang GT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: El Segundo, CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DLSJ5 View Post
So knowing code means you know how to safely/correctly TUNE a FI kit that was not developed by you?
Don't know enough to comment on that, however, I know Mike and he knows what he is doing. As far as your argument on a 3rd party tuning another parties S/C kit, well to be frank I think that's ridiculous. Its the owners money to do with what he pleases. Why shouldn't Mike be allowed to tune an ESS S/Cd car? Is their some sort of Non Compete Disclosure Agreement that goes out with the S/C kit when it is sold? I don't think so. After all this is America not China. If the OP wants to have his car tuned by BPM who are you or anyone to tell him not to.

I have no dog in this fight, as I don't even have BPM software. However, if I was to tune my car, I would have no issues with Mike tuning it. To be honest Drew you are coming across as fanboi for ESS, which you have every right to be just as a lot of people are enamored with Mikes prowess in tuning these cars, normally aspirated or blown.

On a nice note...how are the little ones doing? Growing fast huh? Its scary.

Dave
__________________
2020 Ford Mustang GT 6MT PP1 444rwhp
(Sold)2013 M3 Coupe-MR/BLK ZCP, 2011 M3 Coupe-MR/Blk
2007 Porsche 997C2S Speed Yellow/Blk sport seats
2004 BMW M3 Imola/Blk
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 02:01 PM   #79
happos2
Dingleberries
76
Rep
1,246
Posts

Drives: Gray E92 M3
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Indiana

iTrader: (3)

Another thought....I should never by generic brand drug because the initial patent holder put the sweat in to develop it? Oh gosh, I just egged on the the argument...sorry.
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 02:03 PM   #80
gatorfast
Major General
gatorfast's Avatar
United_States
4998
Rep
6,863
Posts

Drives: 718 Cayman
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SoFla

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DLSJ5 View Post
Oh stop it with the hate crap, tuning an NA motor vs. tuning a FI car are completely different things and stealing someone else's kit/hard work so you can test your tuning skills on FI is hardly reputable or a classy move. News for you, ESS DID build the kit, which is what we are talking about. No one has any hatred towards them they have common sense and can see through all of these recent tune threads and the nonsense, the dude has been banned from this site more than once, apparently he's not all that reputable in terms of his conduct.

We'll have to agree to disagree. I don’t see any difference between BPM tuning a FI car for a kit they didn’t build vs ESS/BMP tuning a stock M3 for an ECU they didn’t build. What about someone who has a full Arka system and buys a tune for it? Arka makes the delete R right to turn off the CEL? Are these tuners then "stealing" Akra's idea of diabling the CEL? What about the Akra exhaust in general? Is Akra ripping off BMW who originally designed the exhaust for the M3?
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 02:04 PM   #81
pkimM3r
Banned
pkimM3r's Avatar
206
Rep
7,298
Posts

Drives: m3 saloon in granny mode.
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lost angeles

iTrader: (0)

What does it matter whos kit you are running? Its a supercharger kit. A tune is separate.

In other FI communities, you source a turbo, a manifold, intercooler, piping, and a tune. You can put whatever parts you want together as you please. Same story here. How is that unethical? I dont see people complaining about having an ESS/BPM/whoever else tune at the expense of Akras hard work?
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 02:09 PM   #82
DLSJ5
Brigadier General
DLSJ5's Avatar
United_States
503
Rep
4,033
Posts

Drives: 2016 F82 M4 ZCP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by astris View Post
So ethics aside, is anyone going to provide any actual information about the tune and numbers? Or are butt dynos and "trust me" statements now considered technical data?
Apparently when it comes to BPM, "butt" dyno's are acceptable.
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ
ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ
Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 02:12 PM   #83
DLSJ5
Brigadier General
DLSJ5's Avatar
United_States
503
Rep
4,033
Posts

Drives: 2016 F82 M4 ZCP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pkim1079 View Post
What does it matter whos kit you are running? Its a supercharger kit. A tune is separate.

In other FI communities, you source a turbo, a manifold, intercooler, piping, and a tune. You can put whatever parts you want together as you please. Same story here. How is that unethical? I dont see people complaining about having an ESS/BPM/whoever else tune at the expense of Akras hard work?
Right, but that's not the case here and your analogy is poor, a supercharger kit will not work run without a tune, and the company that built that kit worked and spent a lot money creating a tune for that kit. Every S65 supercharger kit on the market comes with a tune and none of them want someone else tuning the kit they developed.
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ
ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ
Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 02:18 PM   #84
King Tut
NASA SpecE30 Racer
King Tut's Avatar
United_States
82
Rep
1,307
Posts

Drives: 2006 Honda S2000 TT3
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL

iTrader: (2)

Hillarous thread. I couldn't disagree with DLSJ5 more. Tuners tune. That is what they do. It doesn't matter what manufacturer, what model, what engine, what mods, or especially who designed the supercharger kit on the car. All BMW tuners should be looking to get an ESS supercharger kit equipped car along with all other forced induction kits in their local shop to tune it and offer that tune to their customers. That is just smart business sense. Tuners don't owe anything to any aftermarket forced induction kit's creator. What is in the best interest of the customer is to have options. To see the numbers and the datalogs and choose.
__________________
King Tut
2012 BMW M3 Individual: Sold lsb.ridedomain.com
1987 BMW 325is SpecE30: spece30.ridedomain.com
2009 BMW M3 Coupe: Sold e92.ridedomain.com
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 02:21 PM   #85
happos2
Dingleberries
76
Rep
1,246
Posts

Drives: Gray E92 M3
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Indiana

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by happos2 View Post
Another thought....I should never buy generic brand drug because the initial patent holder put the sweat in to develop it? Oh gosh, I just egged on the the argument...sorry.
I feel like quoting myself. Same exact topic, different industry. Although I fixed my grammatical error with by to buy
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 02:27 PM   #86
GirlsGarage
First Lieutenant
GirlsGarage's Avatar
33
Rep
316
Posts

Drives: F06 M6
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: AE

iTrader: (3)

sounds like running after market cast wheels instead of OEM forged wheels

I don't see anything unethical here. common guys, just Run this BMP tune 550 VS an Ess tuned 550!

would be exciting
__________________

Last edited by GirlsGarage; 09-06-2013 at 02:41 PM..
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 02:30 PM   #87
pkimM3r
Banned
pkimM3r's Avatar
206
Rep
7,298
Posts

Drives: m3 saloon in granny mode.
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lost angeles

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DLSJ5 View Post
Right, but that's not the case here and your analogy is poor, a supercharger kit will not work run without a tune, and the company that built that kit worked and spent a lot money creating a tune for that kit. Every S65 supercharger kit on the market comes with a tune and none of them want someone else tuning the kit they developed.
um, an upgraded turbo kit does NOT work without a tune neither. Hmmm, let me upgrade my 20g to a GT35r and see if that works on the stock ECU.

these kits are basically vortech systems with a custom manifold. you make it seem like they invented superchargers. stop being such a fanboy, and be realistic. I agree with a lot of the posts on here, taking some risk in using a different tune, being on the safe side and getting ESS+ESS, but also a tune is a TUNE. And if the tune comes with the supercharger, why doesn't the tune move with the supercharger if sold second hand?

I'm not saying that ESS sucks. Most guys run their kits and to me, they are quite awesome. But to say that oh since you bought X kit you need X tune is ridiculous.

Lastly, how is that ANY different than saying, you just stepped on akra's toes because you went with X tune.
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2013, 02:31 PM   #88
THE TECH
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
THE TECH's Avatar
307
Rep
13,093
Posts


Drives: BPMsport 2012 E92 M3
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Kansas

iTrader: (45)

Garage List
1. What was used to do the logging:
Logging was performed using Bavarian Technic, BMW Logger, as well as factory BMW Tools.

3. It was first tuned on the dyno, fine tweaked on the road, and retested on the dyno.

4. DansM car was tuned for 93 octane. But we offer software for those with 91, and 100 octane as well. As previously stated we are also working on E85 software for both supercharged and naturally aspirated platforms.

5 + 6: We've requested that the OP dyno his car at his earliest convenience. I don't think there is a 'placebo' effect with a supercharger.

7: The OP bought the kit used, so this wasn't a 'retune'. He came from an NA BPM Stage II setup with Test Pipes originally.

Drew,

I'm sorry you feel that it's unprofessional for a 3rd party to tune another companies kit. We respectfully disagree. In fact, many different tuners have tuned other kits out there. When a customer makes a request for a product or service, there are two options available - to provide it or to pass. Given the time spent on previously testing supercharged vehicles (not just this kit, but other kits as well), and the time spent ensuring that the injector scaling was correct for the injectors used, there was no reason for us not to provide this service -- especially to an existing customer of ours.

Nothing is unethical or line crossing about this. A supercharger consists of a blower made by a third-party, injectors made by a third party, as well as other equipment made by third party manufacturers. Supercharger, injectors, manifold, cooling system, piping, bypass valve, and little touches are what make a kit. It's not complicated. Basically what you are saying is that when you put ANY part on a BMW, whether it be an intake, exhaust, or pulley, etc.. that the manufacturer of said parts is giving "no thought or care to all the hard work, time, money, and effort" that BMW performed. Lets cut the fluff out here and stick to the facts.

I don't think the customer is expecting any help or support from ESS, and if he wants that he is free to purchase software from them. We've suggested that he schedule an appointment at the dyno and provided him with the logging tools and the results of the test will be shared with the community. The only thing that matters is that the customer is happy, and that the product performs as intended. We have full confidence that both of this conditions will be met if not exceeded. We do not want this to turn into an argument with you. We can agree to disagree and understand that we have differences of opinion. The OP will certainly share the results of the dyno and were happy to answer any objective, non-opinionated, questions that anyone may have.

If you sincerely believe what you've already posted in this thread, "If you built a product, that took a lot of money, time, and effort to make and that worked great and was proven, and someone else piggybacked on your hard work for attention and profit, you wouldn't have a problem with that?" then why didn't BMW do the build on your built motor for you? And by this notion, no one should even tune the car in the first place then since tuners would just be "piggybacking" on BMW's work right?

We have a passion for these vehicles and a commitment to excellence, and this has, and will always be our driving force moving forward.

Furthermore and to get more of the skeptics out of the thread, if a motor blows because of a TUNING issue, we will pay for the cost of replacement. This is the same warranty that any of the supercharger "manufacturers" offer with their kits. We/they do not cover anything outside of this, i.e. due to bearing failures or other known issues that occur when forced induction is applied to these cars. For example:

http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=849394
Appreciate 0
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
banhammer, benvo, benvo epic meltdown


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST