|
|
04-01-2014, 06:27 PM | #1 |
New Member
7
Rep 18
Posts |
Using 0W40 = more oil flow is false
To start off I would like to introduce myself. I am a chemical engineer. I have a good understanding of hydraulic (how fluid flow) and pumps.
I want bring up the point using 0w40 to minimize bearing wear. The idea is that thinner oil will have more of flow compared to thicker oil. Therefore, it will provide better protection for daily driving. Because I am not an automotive engineer, I have no idea what protects an engine better. However as a chemical engineer, I can say the statement of using thinner oil will result more flow in a car engine is incorrect. The reason is because the oil pumps in cars are positive displacement pumps. The basic idea of a positive displacement pumps is it will always move the designed amount of volume regardless of discharge pressure. The reality is pump discharge pressure does have a small effect on flow rate due to pump imperfections. But for this discussion, I will limit it to only theoretically how positive displacement pumps operate and not reality. Based on positive displacement pump principle, the amount of engine oil that goes through oil pump is the same regardless of oil viscosity (0w-40 vs 10w-10) as long as the pump has enough power. Before anyone say “does that mean I can use 10w-100 because viscosity doesn’t matter in positive displacement pump,” the answer to that question is both yes and no. If the pump has enough power and the pump components are strong enough, the theoretical flow rate of 10w-100 and 0w-40 is the same through a positive displacement pump. However, the oil pump in cars are limited by timing belt (I think that’s the components that connect the oil pump to the engine) and pump components as they are not strong enough to handle all of an engine’s power. That is why relieve valves are installed to prevent overloading the pump. So if you use too thick of oil, the pump discharge pressure would be high causing the relieve valve to open. When the relieve valve opens, some flow is diverted back to the oil pan without going to the engine components. To summarize, if too thick of oil is used and the oil pump has enough power, the flow rate through the positive displacement pump would be the same. However, the oil going to your engine components will reduce dramatically as most flow is diverted directly back to the oil pan through the relieve valve. If S65 oil system is designed for 10w60, I don’t see how using thinner oil will result in more flow. Positive displacement pump: Thick oil = higher discharge pressure = flow unchanged Thinner oil = lower discharge pressure = flow unchanged |
|
04-01-2014, 06:46 PM | #2 |
Major General
1887
Rep 5,506
Posts |
I don't think the argument is more flow... the argument is that 0w40 has better lubrication of the bearings as the thinner oil can get into smaller places than the thicker oil.
__________________
Auto Detailing Enthusiast!
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 07:16 PM | #4 |
New Member
7
Rep 18
Posts |
I would like to talk about is conservation of mass. Matter cannot be create or destroyed blah blah blah. So if 5 gallons of oil goes in 5 gallons of oil must come out. If more oil is coming out of the smaller bearing clearance, that means less oil in coming out of other place in order to satisfy the conservation of mass law. Fluid takes the path of least resistance. Meaning under the same pressure, you can get more flow through a larger diameter pipe compared to a smaller diameter pipe. In order for more fluid to come out of the bearings, other oil path must reduce flow rate. Therefore, in order for more oil to come out of the bearing the restriction of other path must increased. That's like saying because I used thinner oil, other oil path pipe diameter became smaller.
Like I said I am not an automotive engineer and would love to have input on anything I miss. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 07:22 PM | #5 | |
Grease Monkey
293
Rep 2,646
Posts
Drives: 2011 E90 M3,1994 Euro E36 M3/4
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada
|
Quote:
Secondly the oil pump in the S65 is a variable displacement pressure compensated pump....... When pressure is low the pump displacement is increased until the preset compensator pressure is reached....... The thinner the oil, the more flow it will take to reach the pressure compensator setting. Sorry my friend, your fundamentals are right but you missed some details. If engines had simple positive displacement pumps with no relief circuit, lines and filters would be blown and that is not acceptable. Remember ,the relief valve in the lubrication system of an engine sends flow back to the sump when the pressure is above the relief valve setting (for example during a cold start or when a higher viscosity oil is used)....... This is effectively limiting oil flow to the engine bearings, etc. because the relief valve dumps back to the sump as right after the pump. To sum up: 1)The oil pump in the S65 will indeed flow more oil with a thinner oil than a thicker oil due to it's variable displacement/pressure compensated design. 2)A conventional fixed displacement pump in most normal engines will flow the same amount of oil regardless of viscosity, but the higher pressure that is a result of the higher viscosity oil will mean more oil is going over relief and back to the sump without reaching the engine...... This will also effectively limit oil flow to the engine compared to a lower viscosity oil.
__________________
Last edited by BMRLVR; 04-01-2014 at 07:32 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 07:22 PM | #6 | |
Lieutenant General
7484
Rep 12,305
Posts |
Quote:
And on that note, I'm turning into a spectator from here on out.
__________________
Current:
16 F82 M4 GTS, Black Sapphire/Black, DCT 08 E92 M3, Sparkling Graphite/Bamboo Beige, 6MT 07 E85 Z4M Roadster, Alpine White/Red, 6MT 99 E36 M3, Techno Violet/Dove Grey, 6MT |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 07:39 PM | #7 | |
New Member
7
Rep 18
Posts |
Quote:
Sure can you tell me what is the relieve valve pressure set at? If it is set at 90 psi (arbitrary #), using 10w60 and 0w40 for daily driving would never pop the relieve valve. So the flow rate for both oil through a positive displacement pump is the same. If it is set at 50 psi, high rpm would destroy the engine as the oil pressure builds too high and most oil is diverted from the engine components. If I were designing, I would set the relieve valve pressure high. Let me look up this variable displacement pressure compensated pump |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 08:15 PM | #9 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
233
Rep 1,673
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Electronics Junkie, Engine Builder.
Last edited by kawasaki00; 04-01-2014 at 08:20 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 08:26 PM | #10 | |
Second Lieutenant
84
Rep 225
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
They've done studies, you know. Sixty percent of the time, it works every time. ~ Brian Fantana
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 08:59 PM | #11 |
New Member
7
Rep 18
Posts |
Like I said, I am not an automotive engineer and I might be wrong on the oil system in this car. I would love to learn more facts. Any one can tell another person they are wrong. Some facts to back up your claim would be nice.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 09:06 PM | #12 |
New Member
7
Rep 18
Posts |
Some facts on positive displacement pump:
http://www.pumpschool.com/intro/pd%20vs%20centrif.pdf If the oil system is not using a positive displacement pump, I am complete wrong. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 09:22 PM | #14 | |
Grease Monkey
293
Rep 2,646
Posts
Drives: 2011 E90 M3,1994 Euro E36 M3/4
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada
|
Quote:
Your documentation is with regards to pumps used in industrial plant settings. These pumps run at relatively constant speeds and the systems are usually protected by rupture disks and not relief valves. I appreciate you trying to contribute, but, the application is different and your examples don't apply to a lubrication in an engine. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 10:01 PM | #16 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
233
Rep 1,673
Posts |
Quote:
I will contribute a little tomorrow. I have had a less than desirable night due to other people's driving skills.
__________________
Electronics Junkie, Engine Builder.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 10:06 PM | #17 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
427
Rep 1,947
Posts |
Quote:
Smiley, you presented your credentials and premise of this article based on being a chemical engineer, but your premise and entire discussion concerns mechanical engineering and fluid dynamics (if that's the right terminology here). This is a case where you really need to see how the engine works before starting a thread like this. A timing belt drives the cams and usually only exists on small 4-banger engines. A timing CHAIN drives the cams, but is much stronger than a timing belt. A timing belt is hung outside the block, and timing chain is hung inside it. I've seen oil pumps driven directly from intermediate shafts, shafts driven from other gears, and chains driven directly from the nose of the crank. But I've never seen one driven from a timing belt or timing chain (I'm not saying they don't exist). When you say this is necessary because the oil pump can't handle all of the engine's power, I've got to be honest that I don't even know what that means. If you're saying the oil pump needs a gear reduction to operate at the proper speed, well maybe it does. That's normal. I've been involved in many of these bearing discussions and I don't recall any of them turning into the premise you posed in this article. I'm not saying that it hasn't come up, but I don't remember any such discussion before. I do remember one side saying 10W60 is too thick and advocating 0W40. The other said says 0W40 is too thin and will reduce oil pressure across the bearings. That's when the pro 0W40 side counters by bringing up a positive displacement pump and saying that it's not possible. But I've never seen anybody talk about flow rates with different viscosities being the reason not to switch oils. Translation: the premise of this thread isn't what the discussion has even been about. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 10:08 PM | #18 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
427
Rep 1,947
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 11:15 PM | #19 | ||
New Member
7
Rep 18
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
I am not trying to prove anything. All I want to do is have a logical discussion and understand the things I don't understand. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 11:23 PM | #20 | |
New Member
7
Rep 18
Posts |
Quote:
But some information regarding the industry. Most industry uses relief valves as to rupture disk. The reason is if a rupture disk opens due to pressure you have to replace it. That means shutting down the process. It can take minutes to days to get the replacement part and process going again. In oil and gas, some platform can make up 200 million a day the price of relieve valve compared to that is nothing. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 11:33 PM | #21 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
427
Rep 1,947
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Here's pictures of the S65 oil pump assembly. Notice there are actually two pumps. One pump simply drags oil from the rear to the front of the sump (or I may have it backwards...it's late). The main oil pump is driven directly from the front gear on the crankshaft (see photo-1). In Photo-2, you can see the oil pump with gear that drives directly from the crankshaft. The secondary pump is driven from the chain you see. The secondary pump pull oil from the rear of the sump to the front. I hope this helps visualize the engine a little better. Full set of engine disassembly pictures: http://www.rcollins-home.org/photobu....php?album=204 |
||
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 11:54 PM | #22 | |||
Grease Monkey
293
Rep 2,646
Posts
Drives: 2011 E90 M3,1994 Euro E36 M3/4
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada
|
Quote:
|
|||
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|