BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > M3 (E90 / E92 / E93) > M3 vs....
 
European Auto Source (EAS)
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      11-25-2019, 12:43 PM   #45
SYT_Shadow
///M Powered for Life
SYT_Shadow's Avatar
11480
Rep
10,328
Posts

Drives: E90M/E92M/M4GTS/M4GT4/X5M
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Greenwich, CT

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cjm41 View Post
The V6 does ABSOLUTELY nothing for me. Growing up in the US and being primarily American car nuts in school, we made fun of the kids with the V6 mustang or Camaro. V6s were the "girl versions" of the car.
I'm also European and I have yet to see a single 6 cylinder engine (whether opposing, V or inline) that sounds good. They all sound like crap.

The V8 sounds wonderful.

In Europe I see more of an advantage in faster cars, as you can actually use that every now and then... here on the street even my E46M3 felt pretty fast if I redlined a couple gears
Appreciate 1
cjm41752.50
      11-25-2019, 04:49 PM   #46
ChiBimmer
Second Lieutenant
68
Rep
230
Posts

Drives: 2010 135i 6MT Sold
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Chicago

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bartledoo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiBimmer View Post
Do you feel it's important to get to an E9x under 60k miles? I drove a great 50k E90 that was $23k good 100k example makes that are $20k. These were just test drives an I'm sure I missed some cosmetic issues. They weren't concours cars but pretty good. I've got a thread on the condition of E46's. They're bad. The E90 interiors seem well put together.

I'm not saying you are wrong. If you want your used car to be in near new condition that's your choice and more power to you. My budget means I've got to make some sacrifice somewhere.
Half the mileage with only $3k price difference? The lower mileage would be a no brainer for me.
I agree with you about $23k for 50k miles being a better value than $20k 100k miles . I was replying to someone who felt he needed to spend $35k to get a quality E9x. I should have left out the 100k mike car which just made things confusing.
Appreciate 0
      11-25-2019, 05:23 PM   #47
sdbmwcoding
Captain
United_States
182
Rep
779
Posts

Drives: BMW M3
Join Date: May 2019
Location: San Diego

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiBimmer View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bartledoo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiBimmer View Post
Do you feel it's important to get to an E9x under 60k miles? I drove a great 50k E90 that was $23k good 100k example makes that are $20k. These were just test drives an I'm sure I missed some cosmetic issues. They weren't concours cars but pretty good. I've got a thread on the condition of E46's. They're bad. The E90 interiors seem well put together.

I'm not saying you are wrong. If you want your used car to be in near new condition that's your choice and more power to you. My budget means I've got to make some sacrifice somewhere.
Half the mileage with only $3k price difference? The lower mileage would be a no brainer for me.
I agree with you about $23k for 50k miles being a better value than $20k 100k miles . I was replying to someone who felt he needed to spend $35k to get a quality E9x. I should have left out the 100k mike car which just made things confusing.
Please post up a good spec E9x M3 with 50k miles for 23k. My point is the value of the M3 is not worth it anymore when f8x's are so similar in pricing. Lower mileage M3's are too expensive in the market now. I'm seeing 70-80k mile m3's for 30k now
Appreciate 0
      11-25-2019, 07:35 PM   #48
cjm41
Lieutenant
cjm41's Avatar
United_States
753
Rep
498
Posts

Drives: 2010 E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Southern California

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2010 BMW M3  [0.00]
2014 Land Rover LR4  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by sd********* View Post
Please post up a good spec E9x M3 with 50k miles for 23k. My point is the value of the M3 is not worth it anymore when f8x's are so similar in pricing. Lower mileage M3's are too expensive in the market now. I'm seeing 70-80k mile m3's for 30k now
There are a TON of F8X M3/4s. I could open a window right now, throw a rock, and hit like 3 of them without looking.

The e9X while still not a limited run, were produced in lower numbers and have begun spending more time in garages than in parking lots of people's jobs.

I don't even think it's reasonable to compare the two cars. You couldn't pay me to drive an F8x but I pay a ton for maintenance and fuel to drive an E9x.

I don't believe the e9x are ready to climb in value again yet, but the F8x will continue to depreciate and be worth less, I'm general, than the e9x within the next few years.

Nobody is saying "they can bury me in my F8x I'm never selling it" but that's increasingly a common feeing among e9x owners and that's what will ultimately make them more valuable. My car, and many other e9x M3s will never go back on the market and demand will supersede supply.
__________________
2010 E92 M3 // IG: @commuter_blue
Appreciate 2
oolas3388.00
M3Raw27.50
      11-25-2019, 07:49 PM   #49
kyrix1st
Colonel
kyrix1st's Avatar
2360
Rep
2,361
Posts

Drives: G87 M2; E92M3 MT&DCT; M3 euro
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: nyc

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2004 BMW Z4  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by SYT_Shadow View Post
I'm also European and I have yet to see a single 6 cylinder engine (whether opposing, V or inline) that sounds good. They all sound like crap.

The V8 sounds wonderful.

In Europe I see more of an advantage in faster cars, as you can actually use that every now and then... here on the street even my E46M3 felt pretty fast if I redlined a couple gears
Nah you are just too American. Them V8s got you good

My S50B32 sounded alright but it sounds amazing if coupled with straight pipe.

Mine:


Straight pipe on utbe:
__________________
Pass me if you can.
Appreciate 2
SYT_Shadow11479.50
Montaver2179.00
      11-25-2019, 07:58 PM   #50
wfdeacon88
Major
1105
Rep
1,389
Posts

Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Triad, NC

iTrader: (0)

It's very cheap to tune the F80 and add 100+ WHP stock car as everyone knows.. I have limited knowledge on the F80's reliability, but I've heard about some big issues with multiple critical engine components on tuned (and stock) F80's that make the them a terrifying used car prospect. NA vs BMW first gen turbo M3.. I'll take the V8 every day of the week
Appreciate 0
      11-25-2019, 08:47 PM   #51
Montaver
Lieutenant Colonel
Montaver's Avatar
No_Country
2179
Rep
1,662
Posts

Drives: G87 M2 & M340i LCI
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: NY

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by wfdeacon88 View Post
It's very cheap to tune the F80 and add 100+ WHP stock car as everyone knows.. I have limited knowledge on the F80's reliability, but I've heard about some big issues with multiple critical engine components on tuned (and stock) F80's that make the them a terrifying used car prospect. NA vs BMW first gen turbo M3.. I'll take the V8 every day of the week
The S55 has proven to be very reliable indeed, certainly no less reliable than the S65...
Appreciate 0
      11-25-2019, 09:03 PM   #52
Montaver
Lieutenant Colonel
Montaver's Avatar
No_Country
2179
Rep
1,662
Posts

Drives: G87 M2 & M340i LCI
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: NY

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cjm41 View Post
There are a TON of F8X M3/4s. I could open a window right now, throw a rock, and hit like 3 of them without looking.

The e9X while still not a limited run, were produced in lower numbers and have begun spending more time in garages than in parking lots of people's jobs.

I don't even think it's reasonable to compare the two cars. You couldn't pay me to drive an F8x but I pay a ton for maintenance and fuel to drive an E9x.

I don't believe the e9x are ready to climb in value again yet, but the F8x will continue to depreciate and be worth less, I'm general, than the e9x within the next few years.

Nobody is saying "they can bury me in my F8x I'm never selling it" but that's increasingly a common feeing among e9x owners and that's what will ultimately make them more valuable. My car, and many other e9x M3s will never go back on the market and demand will supersede supply.
Go read the F80 forums, you would be surprised. Lots of people moved from the e9x and consider it a massive upgrade. There seems to be a very vocal minority who want to go back. Its also a very vocal minority who 'want to be buried in it', the reality is most people owned one for a few years and moved on.

Given there are 25,000 E9x M3's in North America alone I think production numbers are a moot point. Its really not hard to find an e9x if you want one.

As for V6 cars and the like being 'girly', thats just a load of macho American BS. American cars have sorely lagged behind the rest of the world until the last 5 years and thats being generous. BMW made one sporting V8 (the S65) and it's better than anything thats come from Detroit. Sure a Shelby GT 350 is nice (i've driven one, it was a riot), but it's a 25k rental car platform with an interior made from melted down slurpee cups and and engine with chocolate internals. It's a flat plane crank V8 and is properly special, however most of the American stuff is lazy push rod V8's that splutter to 6K RPM.

Case in point - Take the new Corvette, go watch the Smoking Tire one take. it sounds like a wheezy Silverado and can barely hit 6.5k RPM.

There is a reason people lust after Skylines, NSX's, old Impreza's, straight 6 BMW's, air-cooled Porsches. No one cares about the last 3 generations of Mustangs or Corvettes because they are cheap disposable poorly engineered garbage.
Appreciate 0
      11-25-2019, 09:19 PM   #53
wfdeacon88
Major
1105
Rep
1,389
Posts

Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Triad, NC

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Montaver View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by wfdeacon88 View Post
It's very cheap to tune the F80 and add 100+ WHP stock car as everyone knows.. I have limited knowledge on the F80's reliability, but I've heard about some big issues with multiple critical engine components on tuned (and stock) F80's that make the them a terrifying used car prospect. NA vs BMW first gen turbo M3.. I'll take the V8 every day of the week
The S55 has proven to be very reliable indeed, certainly no less reliable than the S65...
I mean, that's an extremely misleading statement based on the dozens and dozens of articles and stories all over the place.... nice try!

"For those of you who drive your BMWs hard, take them to the track, or have bolt-on performance products and software upgrades, the crank hub design can spell a near-certain demise for your engine."
https://movementmotorsports.com/2019...ing-time-bomb/
Appreciate 0
      11-25-2019, 09:19 PM   #54
cjm41
Lieutenant
cjm41's Avatar
United_States
753
Rep
498
Posts

Drives: 2010 E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Southern California

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2010 BMW M3  [0.00]
2014 Land Rover LR4  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montaver View Post
Go read the F80 forums, you would be surprised. Lots of people moved from the e9x and consider it a massive upgrade. There seems to be a very vocal minority who want to go back. Its also a very vocal minority who 'want to be buried in it', the reality is most people owned one for a few years and moved on.

Given there are 25,000 E9x M3's in North America alone I think production numbers are a moot point. Its really not hard to find an e9x if you want one.

As for V6 cars and the like being 'girly', thats just a load of macho American BS. American cars have sorely lagged behind the rest of the world until the last 5 years and thats being generous. BMW made one sporting V8 (the S65) and it's better than anything thats come from Detroit. Sure a Shelby GT 350 is nice (i've driven one, it was a riot), but it's a 25k rental car platform with an interior made from melted down slurpee cups and and engine with chocolate internals. It's a flat plane crank V8 and is properly special, however most of the American stuff is lazy push rod V8's that splutter to 6K RPM.

Case in point - Take the new Corvette, go watch the Smoking Tire one take. it sounds like a wheezy Silverado and can barely hit 6.5k RPM.

There is a reason people lust after Skylines, NSX's, old Impreza's, straight 6 BMW's, air-cooled Porsches. No one cares about the last 3 generations of Mustangs or Corvettes because they are cheap disposable poorly engineered garbage.

Not sure if you're trying to convince me of any of this because I don't need it. I haven't driven an American car since I was a teenager because they're piles of shit and I'll double down to the third power your 5 years. Foreign cars started surpassing American cars in the late 70s.

America has tried to make a comeback, and while some of the newer high end cars feel nice, they'll feel like crap by the time they turn 50k miles.

The point I was trying to make was, a few generations got into Chevy or ford or mopar because of their fathers or grandfathers, and that's where the perception of the V6 being a girls car in high school came from.

Also- America has a "macho" problem but I'm not going to get into a cultural and sociological discussion right now. I didn't come up with it, I don't perpetuate it as an adult, I was simply pointing out how it is and why many felt that way.

Where we disagree is with the F8x. Is it an upgrade? Of course. On paper. It's a better car. Period.

The e36 is an upgrade from the e30, doesn't make the e36 more desirable or more expensive.

This discussion popped up in a Facebook group the other day, there was something like 80 e9x M3s for sale in the US right now, there were like 500 F8x for sale. I haven't looked myself but It wouldn't be hard to roughly verify those numbers.
__________________
2010 E92 M3 // IG: @commuter_blue
Appreciate 1
Montaver2179.00
      11-25-2019, 09:31 PM   #55
Montaver
Lieutenant Colonel
Montaver's Avatar
No_Country
2179
Rep
1,662
Posts

Drives: G87 M2 & M340i LCI
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: NY

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by wfdeacon88 View Post
I mean, that's an extremely misleading statement based on the dozens and dozens of articles and stories all over the place.... nice try!

"For those of you who drive your BMWs hard, take them to the track, or have bolt-on performance products and software upgrades, the crank hub design can spell a near-certain demise for your engine."
https://movementmotorsports.com/2019...ing-time-bomb/
Not really. By your flawed logic every S65 must be a 'ticking time bomb' as well. You just posted an infomercial of some random completely unknown shop trying to sell you an install. Thats how they make money. There are very few reports of stock cars spinning the crank hub. As for track work, the S55 has significantly better cooling than the S65 out of the box. You can pound an S55 round all day in 100f+ temps and the needle won't move. Try doing that in an S65.

As for tuned cars having issues, want to increase power? Pay to play. That doesn't make the car unreliable. In the same way supercharging an S65 without doing the bearings wouldn't be prudent either. The difference being when an S65 blows its toast, if an S55 spins its crank hub it can be rebuilt for way less than the cost of a new engine.
Appreciate 0
      11-25-2019, 09:40 PM   #56
wfdeacon88
Major
1105
Rep
1,389
Posts

Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Triad, NC

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Montaver View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by wfdeacon88 View Post
I mean, that's an extremely misleading statement based on the dozens and dozens of articles and stories all over the place.... nice try!

"For those of you who drive your BMWs hard, take them to the track, or have bolt-on performance products and software upgrades, the crank hub design can spell a near-certain demise for your engine."
https://movementmotorsports.com/2019...ing-time-bomb/
Not really. By your flawed logic every S65 must be a 'ticking time bomb' as well. You just posted an infomercial of some random completely unknown shop trying to sell you an install. Thats how they make money. There are very few reports of stock cars spinning the crank hub. As for track work, the S55 has significantly better cooling than the S65 out of the box. You can pound an S55 round all day in 100f+ temps and the needle won't move. Try doing that in an S65.

As for tuned cars having issues, want to increase power? Pay to play. That doesn't make the car unreliable. In the same way supercharging an S65 without doing the bearings wouldn't be prudent either. The difference being when an S65 blows its toast, if an S55 spins its crank hub it can be rebuilt for way less than the cost of a new engine.
I believe it costs $1k or less to tune an S55 to 500+ whp... and $10k+ to do that on an S65, including a lot of hardware. The main point was related to the ease of tuning and how it could be more likely an F80 has been taken beyond it's limits in stock form by a higher % of owners. On a turbo with all that power, I wouldn't want to be a second+ owner not knowing what could go wrong.
Appreciate 0
      11-26-2019, 06:07 AM   #57
pbonsalb
Lieutenant General
5231
Rep
10,614
Posts

Drives: 18 F90 M5, 99 E36 M3 Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: New England

iTrader: (4)

A new 340i will beat an E9xM3 to 60 and is as quick and fast or quicker and faster through the quarter mile. The 340i hangs with the F80M3 to 60 as well, but at least the F80M3 pulls away through the quarter mile.
Appreciate 0
      11-26-2019, 05:52 PM   #58
ChiBimmer
Second Lieutenant
68
Rep
230
Posts

Drives: 2010 135i 6MT Sold
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Chicago

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by sd********* View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiBimmer View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bartledoo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiBimmer View Post
Do you feel it's important to get to an E9x under 60k miles? I drove a great 50k E90 that was $23k good 100k example makes that are $20k. These were just test drives an I'm sure I missed some cosmetic issues. They weren't concours cars but pretty good. I've got a thread on the condition of E46's. They're bad. The E90 interiors seem well put together.

I'm not saying you are wrong. If you want your used car to be in near new condition that's your choice and more power to you. My budget means I've got to make some sacrifice somewhere.
Half the mileage with only $3k price difference? The lower mileage would be a no brainer for me.
I agree with you about $23k for 50k miles being a better value than $20k 100k miles . I was replying to someone who felt he needed to spend $35k to get a quality E9x. I should have left out the 100k mike car which just made things confusing.
Please post up a good spec E9x M3 with 50k miles for 23k. My point is the value of the M3 is not worth it anymore when f8x's are so similar in pricing. Lower mileage M3's are too expensive in the market now. I'm seeing 70-80k mile m3's for 30k now
What's good vs bad spec? Differences seem pretty minimal to me. Year, color, edc, slicktop don't seem like big differences—to me. One's mileage may vary on these things.
Appreciate 0
      11-26-2019, 06:07 PM   #59
ChiBimmer
Second Lieutenant
68
Rep
230
Posts

Drives: 2010 135i 6MT Sold
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Chicago

iTrader: (0)

F80 or E90...

Quote:
Originally Posted by pbonsalb View Post
A new 340i will beat an E9xM3 to 60 and is as quick and fast or quicker and faster through the quarter mile. The 340i hangs with the F80M3 to 60 as well, but at least the F80M3 pulls away through the quarter mile.
E9x m3 is not a drag car. I believe these claims of straight line speed are also true of E9x 335i with a tune and maybe a breather mod.
Appreciate 0
      11-26-2019, 07:18 PM   #60
cjm41
Lieutenant
cjm41's Avatar
United_States
753
Rep
498
Posts

Drives: 2010 E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Southern California

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2010 BMW M3  [0.00]
2014 Land Rover LR4  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiBimmer View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbonsalb View Post
A new 340i will beat an E9xM3 to 60 and is as quick and fast or quicker and faster through the quarter mile. The 340i hangs with the F80M3 to 60 as well, but at least the F80M3 pulls away through the quarter mile.
E9x m3 is not a drag car. I believe these claims of straight line speed are also true of E9x 335i with a tune and maybe a breather mod.
I think people use the quarter mile times because it's simple. I've never really understood its purpose. Yes, it's a measurement of speed but it's pretty irrelevant to cars like this.

It seems like a major disservice and extreme over-simplification to reduce any M car to 10-12 seconds of straight line driving.

I could buy a $2500 fox body mustang and put used $2000 supercharger on it, a cheap set of drag radials, and obliterate any car mentioned in this thread going straight in an amount of time that can literally be counted on fingers.

Of course, this would best be accomplished while sporting an aerodynamic mullet, but I digress.
__________________
2010 E92 M3 // IG: @commuter_blue
Appreciate 1
tigermack474.50
      11-26-2019, 08:39 PM   #61
pbonsalb
Lieutenant General
5231
Rep
10,614
Posts

Drives: 18 F90 M5, 99 E36 M3 Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: New England

iTrader: (4)

I was referring to a stock 340i. If you want to mod it, it could out handle an E9xM3 as well as out perform it in a straight line.

99% of my driving is on reasonably straight roads where I might run into a stock 340i that could show me its tail lights. You guys that live on mountains, in canyons, on race tracks and in the autobahn are lucky — you could probably eventually put some distance on the 340i. Unless of course it was modded — Bimmerworld modded a 335i years ago to equal an E9xM3 on the track.
Appreciate 0
      11-26-2019, 09:15 PM   #62
wfdeacon88
Major
1105
Rep
1,389
Posts

Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Triad, NC

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pbonsalb View Post
I was referring to a stock 340i. If you want to mod it, it could out handle an E9xM3 as well as out perform it in a straight line.

99% of my driving is on reasonably straight roads where I might run into a stock 340i that could show me its tail lights. You guys that live on mountains, in canyons, on race tracks and in the autobahn are lucky — you could probably eventually put some distance on the 340i. Unless of course it was modded — Bimmerworld modded a 335i years ago to equal an E9xM3 on the track.
nobody cares about how fast or whatever some 340/335 is modded.. literally nobody cares. They are shit.
Appreciate 0
      11-26-2019, 10:02 PM   #63
pbonsalb
Lieutenant General
5231
Rep
10,614
Posts

Drives: 18 F90 M5, 99 E36 M3 Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: New England

iTrader: (4)

Ok. It is good you don’t mind getting spanked by one. I am not an M snob, though, and appreciate fast cars. I even appreciate the guy with the mustang you think is so far below you, who works with what he has and makes a fast car despite his limited budget.
Appreciate 0
      11-26-2019, 10:07 PM   #64
wfdeacon88
Major
1105
Rep
1,389
Posts

Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Triad, NC

iTrader: (0)

I'm not a snob about these cars. They aren't expensive to buy. I also have no issue that other cars are faster.. I just don't think it matters and most E9x m3 owners don't care about certain modded faster 335is.... its been beaten to death over the years and just doesn't matter.
Appreciate 1
cjm41752.50
      11-27-2019, 05:35 AM   #65
pbonsalb
Lieutenant General
5231
Rep
10,614
Posts

Drives: 18 F90 M5, 99 E36 M3 Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: New England

iTrader: (4)

That is what the loser of the race often says. Well, I have an M badge on my car and it has better feel and sounds better. Or they won’t give the guy a friendly run in the first place. Most bought for the M status. To be fair, a few get their thrills on the track, which is great. In my 9 years and 70k miles with the E90M3, I have been to the track only once and dragstrip only once, but that is still more than most owners — who never go.
Appreciate 0
      11-27-2019, 06:13 AM   #66
TomHudson
Major
658
Rep
1,118
Posts

Drives: 2011 E90 M3
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pbonsalb View Post
I was referring to a stock 340i. If you want to mod it, it could out handle an E9xM3 as well as out perform it in a straight line.

99% of my driving is on reasonably straight roads where I might run into a stock 340i that could show me its tail lights. You guys that live on mountains, in canyons, on race tracks and in the autobahn are lucky — you could probably eventually put some distance on the 340i. Unless of course it was modded — Bimmerworld modded a 335i years ago to equal an E9xM3 on the track.
My supercharged E36 M3 would out perform the 340, but I don’t miss it.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 PM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST