|
|
03-07-2019, 07:25 PM | #1 |
Lieutenant
753
Rep 498
Posts
Drives: 2010 E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Southern California
|
Mysteriously Running Rich
I brought my car in for rod bearings this week. I also had an Active Autowerke x-pipe installed while it was there since I continually had exhaust leak issues with my test pipes.
I picked the car up last night and it's running rich, like burn your eyeballs at a red light, change clothes three times a day rich. I just came back from dinner and I smell like I was racing go carts or mowing lawns. Here's the weird thing... test pipes to x-pipe is, for the most part, the same amount of restriction, from an emissions perspective. Prior to this, the car might smell a bit at a red light, but it was barely noticeable, and not really a stinging burnt fuel smell like it is now. I also have black soot forming on the never before dirty tailpipes and i wiped a little off my bumper before. Shop said the car needs a tune. I've got a BPM Stage 2 tune. Any idea what could have changed from test pipes to x-pipe to turn my car from a luxury sports car to a track beater? I've attached a picture of me after standing behind my car while it was running. .
__________________
2010 E92 M3 // IG: @commuter_blue
|
03-07-2019, 07:40 PM | #2 |
Major
686
Rep 1,230
Posts |
If you just had test pipes on your old OEM x pipe that means it still had the secondary cats. The AA X-pipe doesn't have any cats so of course its gonna smell different. So congrats on becoming a man and going catless
|
Appreciate
2
jdamore432.50 commedeschatons134.00 |
03-07-2019, 07:50 PM | #3 | |
Lieutenant
753
Rep 498
Posts
Drives: 2010 E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Southern California
|
Quote:
Seriously, I cannot imagine the secondary cats filtering this much. I wish I was exaggerating about the burning my eyes thing. For what it's worth I called AA today about this and they said going from test pipes and stock midpipe to their x-pipe shouldn't make a difference in smell, just sound.
__________________
2010 E92 M3 // IG: @commuter_blue
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-07-2019, 07:58 PM | #4 |
Major
353
Rep 1,005
Posts
Drives: GMC Sierra
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
|
Lol dude you're gross.
__________________
We grow food to feed the animals so we can eat the animals
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-07-2019, 09:03 PM | #5 |
mTekMods
2143
Rep 2,902
Posts |
If there’s no cats in the x pipe the car will stink.
__________________
2011 Frozen Black/Fox Red E90 M3 650+WHP
G-Power Supercharged First DCT to Manual Conversion Worldwide KW CS, BBS RI-A, BW Headers, Snow 2.5 |
Appreciate
0
|
03-07-2019, 09:18 PM | #6 |
Lieutenant
753
Rep 498
Posts
Drives: 2010 E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Southern California
|
I should mention I've owned cars with no cats before. This is worse than my built 306 in my 11 second mustang. Going to re-tune the car next week. If it still smells I may be willing to trade this new x-pipe for something with HFCs. I'll call AA tomorrow and pick their brain.
The shop told me it was running rich. I don't doubt for a second that these guys know their stuff and have probably installed 20+ of the same x-pipe on the same car. I'd like to get to the bottom of the running rich thing before I try lose hundreds of dollars selling something I used to drive home from the shop and to the grocery store.
__________________
2010 E92 M3 // IG: @commuter_blue
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-07-2019, 09:26 PM | #7 |
Brigadier General
1688
Rep 3,140
Posts
Drives: 2014 M5 6MT
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Massachusetts
|
The exhaust leak ( at the header to xpipe connection) is making the car enrich the fuel mixture. The leak allows the faster exhaust velocity inside the pipe to create a pressure differential, allowing fresh air to rush into the pipe. The car thinks its running lean so it enriches the mixture.
Get the leak fixed. This is a common issue in cases where those gaskets are not replaced. I've installed that xpipe a dozen times and you can rotate the pipes into an incorrect position, and still bolt it on. The flange isnt flush and creates a leak.
__________________
2014 M5 6MT
|
Appreciate
1
Timujin352.50 |
03-07-2019, 09:30 PM | #8 | |
Lieutenant
753
Rep 498
Posts
Drives: 2010 E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Southern California
|
Quote:
As of yesterday I have a new x pipe and no exhaust leak. This is when the running rich problem first appeared.
__________________
2010 E92 M3 // IG: @commuter_blue
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-07-2019, 09:48 PM | #9 |
mTekMods
2143
Rep 2,902
Posts |
Interesting, reset the adaptations on the dme then do a drivecycle
__________________
2011 Frozen Black/Fox Red E90 M3 650+WHP
G-Power Supercharged First DCT to Manual Conversion Worldwide KW CS, BBS RI-A, BW Headers, Snow 2.5 |
Appreciate
0
|
03-08-2019, 07:28 AM | #10 |
First Lieutenant
94
Rep 326
Posts |
I have many times that canceling the secondary catalysts brought much more smell so I did not cancel mine ... there are more people who canceled them and then went back to test pipes ..
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-08-2019, 08:35 AM | #11 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
3387
Rep 7,541
Posts |
People often think that they are running rich because of the smell. Our software does not run any richer than stock, and will be at lambda 1 under idling and part throttle conditions. Read the oxygen sensors or use a tailpipe sniffer and you will see that the mixture is likely spot on, and the smell of being Catless or having a modified exhaust setup is being confused with running rich.
If there is any unmetered air being introduced into the exhaust stream, the vehicle may respond by richening the mixture to compensate for this. A shop indicting that you need a tune to solve this sounds very inexperienced. Instead of guessing, actually verify that you are infact running rich by looking at the mixture. Tuning to specifically solve something that shouldn't be happening in the first place would be band-aiding an existing problem that should be fixed with methods other the software. The software will not cause the mixture to be overly enriched unless there is a reason to call for it.
__________________
-----| Like us on Facebook | Instagram || Tuning Information | Remote Coding |----- ----Visit us at www.BPMSport.com - Emotion. Driven. | Toll Free: (888) 557-5133---- |
Appreciate
1
cjm41752.50 |
03-08-2019, 08:38 AM | #12 | |
Lieutenant
753
Rep 498
Posts
Drives: 2010 E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Southern California
|
Quote:
__________________
2010 E92 M3 // IG: @commuter_blue
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-08-2019, 08:44 AM | #13 | ||
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
3387
Rep 7,541
Posts |
Quote:
They are akin to going with high flow cats over a Catless setup on a car with only one set of cats - a very large difference in smell and in reducing emissions. A completely Catless M3 will have a fairly strong smell.
__________________
-----| Like us on Facebook | Instagram || Tuning Information | Remote Coding |----- ----Visit us at www.BPMSport.com - Emotion. Driven. | Toll Free: (888) 557-5133---- |
||
Appreciate
1
cjm41752.50 |
03-08-2019, 10:06 AM | #14 |
Colonel
3085
Rep 2,747
Posts |
Yep my car was catless for about a week.. now I have three different x pipes for my car..
Make sure you're sliding the choke from "turtle" to "rabbit" once the car's warmed up a little... lol
__________________
9ers
|
Appreciate
1
commedeschatons134.00 |
03-08-2019, 10:20 AM | #15 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1341
Rep 1,881
Posts |
I have the evolve Xpipe with HFC in secondary postition, and i still think the car smells pretty bad. Thats until i follow my buddies in their catless cars....catless s65 smells pretty bad.
__________________
I am never able to post pictures on forums, all my pics are on IG @baye30 https://www.instagram.com/baye30/
Current Garage - [2011 E90 M3 ZCP] [2005 E53 X5 3.0 Sport] [1988 E30 325IS 24V] |
Appreciate
0
|
03-08-2019, 10:30 AM | #16 |
Lieutenant
753
Rep 498
Posts
Drives: 2010 E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Southern California
|
Alright so I called AA to price out their HFCs. They ain't cheap, that's for sure.
- They agreed that my description of how strong the smell is and the carbon buildup is not simply from deleting the secondary cats. That I should expect to smell more, but to the extent I describe. - The shop that installed the x-pipe (reputable, forum members, authorized AA dealer) told me the car seemed to be running rich, almost immediately after starting it. Anyway- AA said it's possible re-tuning would help, but that it's not that it's a problem related to any tune itself, but that something may be amiss and re-tuning could solve the problem. Especially since BPM commented here I wanted to make that clear. I purchased the car with the BPM tune so I'm not a BPM customer, myself, I do not have the software or the cable. I have no reason to believe this is related to any specific tune, but it couldn't hurt to wipe a 5 year old tune and start fresh to at least rule it out. If a new tune and new plugs don't clear the issue up (or at least bring the smell and soot within tolerable threshold) I will consider purchasing the AA cats which will fit my new x-pipe, this way I can swap them out for meets/cruises or track days.
__________________
2010 E92 M3 // IG: @commuter_blue
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-08-2019, 10:42 AM | #17 |
///M
237
Rep 703
Posts |
Whats your AFRs? I'm straight piped and sure I smell gas but not to the extent you're talking about and I'm running Gintani's extreme burble tune. Double check for leaks.
I doubt its the donut gasket at the headers / test pipe area because those usually throw a bunch of misfire codes if something is missing. Like you said, the shop installed the x pipe so they probably forgot to tighten something up. They recommended a tune off the bat to fix a smell problem? lol.
__________________
Follow me on IG: dre.pt
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-08-2019, 10:46 AM | #18 | |
Lieutenant
753
Rep 498
Posts
Drives: 2010 E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Southern California
|
Quote:
I'm super sensitive to exhaust leaks. There are none. I'm positive. No codes being thrown either.
__________________
2010 E92 M3 // IG: @commuter_blue
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-08-2019, 10:50 AM | #19 | |
///M
237
Rep 703
Posts |
Quote:
Did the shop tell you how they indicated its running rich?
__________________
Follow me on IG: dre.pt
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-08-2019, 10:52 AM | #21 |
Colonel
2621
Rep 2,138
Posts
Drives: 2011 E92 M3
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Victoria
|
I think part of it is that the S65 in general is a gas guzzling pig. Akin to a 1976 Ford with a 460 and a 2 barrel. Come to think of it, my 1976 ford may have actually been better on gas than my M3...
All that fuel has to go out of the exhaust... Likely why they E92 has more catalytic converter volume than any other car I have ever seen!!! I know the smell when I had test-pipes was very noticeable compared to stock. Could only imagine it with zero cats...
__________________
2011 E92 M3 - 6MT, ZCP, ZF LSD, ESS G1, Some other goodies... |
Appreciate
0
|
03-08-2019, 11:04 AM | #22 | ||
Lieutenant
753
Rep 498
Posts
Drives: 2010 E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Southern California
|
Quote:
I was at the shop when they started it for the first time. After about a minute they said it was running rich, to which I immediately agreed as the smell was pretty intense. Although I'm not getting any popping, my downshifts are a little sloppy sounding like maybe it's a bit muffled. I'll occasionally get a pop on downshift but it's happening under me, not put the tailpipe. Here's a quick shot of me coming to a red light. Downshifting into first you can hear it's not super clean. Don't know if something that mild is indicative of running rich.
__________________
2010 E92 M3 // IG: @commuter_blue
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|