|
|
04-03-2015, 11:56 AM | #24 |
Private First Class
63
Rep 185
Posts |
The M3 is a great car, but it is big and heavy which kind of spoils the fun a little bit. The M235i feels a little more pedestrian to drive, but you'll instantly appreciate its size.
If you need to buy a car right now, my advice would be to get the used M3 and in a few years trade it for a used M2. The depreciation of the M235i will eat up any maintenance and fuel savings you'd see, so from a financial standpoint the M3 is actually smarter or at the very least on par. The M2 will combine the best of both cars in my opinion. Good luck! |
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2015, 07:04 PM | #25 |
Private First Class
27
Rep 137
Posts |
Hey there!
I'm actually going to test drive both vehicles this weekend to get an idea of what I think would suite me best daily. Unfortunately I'm not able to find a E90 M3 in Manual only E92 M3 at the moment. If I was going to opt for the E9X M3 I really would prefer a sedan but not sure if the driving experience is different from the coupe? Either way at this point don't really have an option so I give it a shot and see. Will let you know how it turns out. Thanks! |
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2015, 09:49 PM | #26 |
Brigadier General
3663
Rep 3,422
Posts |
If you like the E92 manual, you'll like an E90 manual. You'll have very hard time distinguishing the two from the driver's seat.
To make an informed decision, make sure you rev the E92 all the way out to 8400 in 2nd.
__________________
M4 GTS, GT3, C63 S | E90 M3s, E39 M5
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2015, 02:57 AM | #27 |
Lord Scrip
1813
Rep 3,013
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: LA,Ca
|
I had an 07 335i coupe for 4 years. Loved it! Traded it for my 2011 M3 Coupe. The 335 was great on gas for the power it offered. My M3 gets worse mileage but not by as much as you would think. I live in LA and DD both cars. I average 50,000 miles a year. I can nurse my M3 into getting 20-30mpg. My 335 I could nurse 35-40mpg. If I could have afforded it, I would have got the M3 sooner. Amazing car! The 335 felt more nimble and agile but it ran out of torque after 4,500 RPM. The M feels not sporty but destructive! I paid 39,000 for a M3 loaded coupe with everything, so $45,000 for less is a rip! If you know the car and what it should run like go to Carmax or something other than a BMW dealer. Carmax offers a warranty to 125,000 and it's cheaper than BMW's extended warranty but doesn't cover oil and brakes. Be real bro.....you'll have the gayass 2 and be jealous every time you see a mean ass M3! I was when I had my 335.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2015, 12:28 AM | #28 |
Private First Class
27
Rep 137
Posts |
Hi everyone,
I had the opportunity to test drive both vehicles over the weekend and took account of everyone's replies and suggestions. I drove the a 2009 e92 manual and like other posts stated I took it to about 7500 rpm. This vehicle is so different when reved high and really comes alive. There is a rawness about this vehicle that is so intoxicating but hard for me to explain... Also the stance and everything about it to me looks just right. After test driving the e92m I drove a M235i but it was auto so I'm not sure if the comparison is fair. Either way I just was trying to picture myself driving this daily. This vehicle was quicker than I expected, actually seems just as quick as the e92m to me at the moment? The interior and cabin does feel updated as it should being a 2015 model. Now as for the exterior looks the e9x looks more aggressive and proportional compared to the 235. I honestly like the way e9x exterior looks more. If I had the opportunity to find a decent e90 M3 in manual right now that would be my choice but I can't find one... I wish I could afford a 2015 M3 but I only budgeted for 50K for my next vehicle and need to stay within the guidelines I set for myself. But again I really wanted to thank everyone for their thoughts and personal experiences because it does help me answer many questions that I've had. ** One last question is there any difference between 2008 - 2013 e9x models other than pricing? Last edited by Mjosh; 04-08-2015 at 02:13 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2015, 04:11 PM | #29 | |
Banned
825
Rep 3,387
Posts |
Quote:
2009 - CIC navigation, LED tail lights, no pre-wiring. You can upgrade the 2008 model parts to the 2009 model parts (the car has to be coded for them to work) except the factory alarm pre-wiring. Upgrading the E90 tail lights requires changing out the trunk lid and the lights, whereas the E92 only requires the lights. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2015, 06:20 PM | #30 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
289
Rep 1,535
Posts |
Quote:
e90 2008 - pre LCI 2009+ - LCI (nav, tailights) 2011 - Comp pkg offered only this year e92/e93 2008-2010 pre LCI tail light 2009+ LCI (nav) 2011+ LCI tailight+nav + comp pkg offered Now if you are considering buying a 2008 model and then do the above upgrades, I say rethink again because upgrading nav will cost you at least $2000, LCI tailights will cost you 680 + programming (200-300) about 1000k in total if e92. If it is e90 you have to change the trunk which will cost another additional...comp pkg another story... What I am trying to say is if you like the 2009+ model, then just go for 2009 and don't buy pre-lci model as it will end up costing you more than a 2009 model... Good luck with your new car |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2015, 07:31 PM | #31 | |
Banned
825
Rep 3,387
Posts |
Quote:
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmm, the only thing I didn't include was the comp package, but I can't say that's "a lot". Regarding the costs: a) upgrading the CIC is running about $1300-$1500 now, and that's including coding. b) regarding the lci E92 conversion, BMW of Morristown, NJ sells these brand new with the necessary adapters for pre-lci for $529 shipped, not $680+. Used sets are going for ~$400. And coding for these isn't $200-$300, especially not when combined with other coded features. I had mine done by Benvo and it was quite a bit less than that. Less information is better than misinformation |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2015, 07:37 PM | #32 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
289
Rep 1,535
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2015, 08:04 PM | #33 | ||||
Banned
825
Rep 3,387
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If one is feeling froggy, coding can be done on your own http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=451145 Quote:
Last edited by whats77inaname; 04-08-2015 at 08:10 PM.. |
||||
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2015, 08:27 PM | #34 |
Private First Class
27
Rep 137
Posts |
Thanks for the info in regards to then different years. I'm surprised that people know that much detailed info between the years!!
Looks like if anything going for 2009 an up would be the better choice. Thanks again for all the help! |
Appreciate
0
|
04-12-2015, 05:10 PM | #35 |
S65B40 FTMFW
66
Rep 222
Posts |
Awesome thread! I went through nearly the same dilemma when choosing between M235i vs. E90 M3. What made my decision harder was the M235i's were fresh from the docks and the particular E90 M3 I was looking at was a unicorn (2011.75 AW/FR 6MT ZCP). Needless to say I chose the latter and never looked back... and trust me I play in 405 traffic from time to time...
OP if you are concerned with the 6MT transmission feel in the M235i just go test drive a 6MT F30 335i, they share the same transmission! Good luck!
__________________
| BimmerWorld | BMW Performance | Dinan | Future Classic | iND-Distribution | LUX | Macht Schnell |
| Performance Friction Corporation | ProjectKics | Turner Motorsports | |
Appreciate
0
|
04-13-2015, 12:07 PM | #37 | |
Major General
4467
Rep 7,110
Posts |
Quote:
nice to hear that you got the opportunity to test both. Your short description is spot on to what I felt testing the M235i. Yes it is basically as fast which also according to the spec (i.e. 4.7 for my E90 vs 4.8s to 100km/h). Once you get up to speed the M3 leave the 235 slightly behind though. And yes again, the M3 is certainly much much more "raw" and with the engine and transmission noises coming on top. THIS is what you need to enjoy well enough to pay the premium bro. If not, better go with the lower cost M235. Oh, being a manual guy for decades and yet crazy enjoy the DCT, I would re consider the non MYT being an issue. Good luck |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-13-2015, 12:26 PM | #38 |
Major General
1889
Rep 5,506
Posts |
I drove the M235i in manual. The transmission feels a lot more direct and easier to drive than than the M3. The M3's transmission feels notchy and not as precise.
But as for a daily driver and you get stuck in traffic, I would pick an automatic over the manual every day. LA traffic can get pretty bad (30 minutes to go 1 mile) and I've been stuck in it in a manual car before - my left leg really hurt and it was a painful experience. People who live outside of California can not relate to how bad traffic is. You can literally get out and walk faster than driving sometimes. For your daily driver, I'd say the M235i is definitely a better choice whether you get manual or not. I have two cars so I reserve the M3 for more fun trips on open roads and weekend track days.
__________________
Auto Detailing Enthusiast!
Last edited by Z K; 04-13-2015 at 12:39 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-13-2015, 05:10 PM | #39 |
Captain
81
Rep 734
Posts |
OP, out of both vehicles, as mentioned by previous responses from other members, go with the one you have the urge of getting. Both is a fantastic vehicle and you couldn't really go wrong.
Other things you might want to consider is the resale value. The E9x M3 will definitely have a better resell value than the M235i. Whoever bought it already took the hit on the initial depreciation where as if you get the M235i brand new, you'll be taking the hit. Also, if you LOVE the M3, but just couldn't find a right E90 M3 for the moment, maybe consider option #3! Get a beater or something that you can have fun with for less money, and wait for the E90 M3 to show up! Personally speaking, the E90 M3 does NOT have the stance and aethetics as the E92 especially from the rear (the rear end is very minimalist and not as aggressive as the E92). However, all in all when side by side with a normal E90 non-m3, it is still spectacular. I personally too prefer the E90 for the 4 door look and the rarity. The new turbo'ed BMWs are insanely comfortable on the road. Loads of Torque and Power that makes the M3 seems "slow". If your driving characteristics are for short bursts of unrivaled power and not revving the engine out, then the M235i is a no brainer, very very good vehicle. Personally, i will wait for the M2 (if it ever comes out with one, pretty sure they will... bmw have M vehicles for all besides the 7 xD). Cheers and let us know! Good Luck!
__________________
94' NSX - Garage Queen
97' Integra Type R - Track Warrior (Sold) 01' BMW E39 M5 (Sold), 2x 02' BMW E39 M5 (Sold & sold) 08' E90 M3 6MT - DD 13' W212 E63 AMG Wagon |
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2015, 12:12 AM | #40 | |
Private First Class
27
Rep 137
Posts |
Quote:
I'd thought I was the only crazy one cross shopping these two vehicles... Very different however both great in their own ways!! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2015, 12:18 AM | #41 | |
Private First Class
27
Rep 137
Posts |
Quote:
Thanks for confirming because I thought I was out of my mind... No way these two feels the same but at that moment I was trying to talk myself out of it but couldn't. I decided to take delivery of the 235 I ordered to my specs due to what you stated lower cost and also there was not a E90 M3 available in manual in decent condition. At this point I already sold my Mk7 Gti and was driving a rental so didn't want to keep renting a car until the right E90 M3 came around... Thanks for your inputs!! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2015, 12:22 AM | #42 | |
Private First Class
27
Rep 137
Posts |
Quote:
Your absolutely correct traffic is horrible and when it gets bad it gets really bad!! I decided to go with the 235 and finally got to test one in manual. Unfortunate it had to be the one I ordered back in January but either way I'm happy with the way it came out. Your correct sometimes walking is faster Thanks for your input!! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2015, 12:36 AM | #43 | |
Private First Class
27
Rep 137
Posts |
Quote:
You read my mind! Both vehicles are great in their own ways but characteristics are so different. Wish I could go for the M2 or even new M3 but my 50k budget wouldn't support either... If I had the opportunity of a decent used E90 M3 manual I would of jumped on it right away but too bad I didn't have that choice. Settled on the 235 I ordered and now just enjoy what I chose. Appreciate your input as well as everyone else's because it did answer a lot of my questions! Cheers! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-28-2015, 12:20 PM | #44 | |
Major
382
Rep 1,170
Posts
Drives: 2020 F97 X3M
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SoFla/ATL
|
Quote:
__________________
2011 MINI CooperS BRGII/Lounge Green/Sport/Prem/Connect/Black Xenon/Black Conical Spokes/ACS springs/ACS exhaust/Alta Shorty/Yokohama Advan Sport A/S
2012 M3 AW/FR NDH2/2MK/ZPP/ZCP/ZCW/752/6NR/OEM CF splitters/OEM CF Mirror caps (retired) 2012 X3 35i Titanium Silver/Black ZAP/ZPP/TECH/APPS/Breyton GTS (retired) 2018 X3 M40i BSM/Oyster/ZPP/ZPX/HK/S6CPA/718M(retired) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|