|
|
05-21-2015, 06:09 AM | #23 |
Major General
4993
Rep 6,860
Posts |
Im with others saying why on earth would carmax fix your car which wasnt broken? Maybe in your opinion it sounded like something was wrong but it was still running fine.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2015, 08:05 AM | #24 | |
Lord Scrip
1812
Rep 3,013
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: LA,Ca
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2015, 08:15 AM | #25 |
Lord Scrip
1812
Rep 3,013
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: LA,Ca
|
Thank you for the comments people. I do appreciate them whether or not we agree.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2015, 08:45 AM | #27 | |
Lord Scrip
1812
Rep 3,013
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: LA,Ca
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2015, 08:51 AM | #28 |
Major
1243
Rep 1,287
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2015, 09:04 AM | #29 |
Lord Scrip
1812
Rep 3,013
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: LA,Ca
|
You are correct. The noise was very subtle but was much louder 3 weeks later. This is why I did it. My opinion in this issue is....noise intensity corresponds to damage. Being that mine was never allowed to get worse and they look like this, is the reason I posted my pictures.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2015, 09:05 AM | #30 |
Brigadier General
3938
Rep 3,980
Posts |
What are those numbers beside each bearing?
Was the clearance checking before removal? or was that the clearance with the new bearings? I am not surprised a warranty company won't cover a bearing change, the ticking noise is a sign that something is about to go, but from their perspective nothing has happened yet. They wouldn't have covered anything until the bearing had spun and damaged the engine. That's how warranty works... While they do show wear, there are no signs of any pulls or signs of a bearing about to spin. That kind of thing is hard to predict, it could have been 1mile or 10,000 miles before something happened. I am a bit surprised there was a noise with just that kind of bearing wear, but I'm no expert.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2015, 09:07 AM | #31 |
Lord Scrip
1812
Rep 3,013
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: LA,Ca
|
Can I post videos from my PC? My phone app won't let me. I want you guys to hear me pull up my driveway and in my garage days before the repair.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2015, 09:10 AM | #32 | |
Lord Scrip
1812
Rep 3,013
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: LA,Ca
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2015, 09:34 AM | #33 | |||||
Banned
75
Rep 273
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Those bearing look like normal wear to me also. You are a victim of paranoia and wasted $2,300 on unecessary preventive work. The s65 requires specific 10W60 oil as you know (or 0W40 oil). Carmax has contracts with wholesale cheap oil suppliers. They don't buy less common oil (and expensive 10W60 oil) and are stingy as hell every cent they spend if to make the sell and keep the sold cars running long enough out of their 90 days warranty. It's the only reason they systematically change oil. I found this written by an ex-carmax employee : "Carmax keeps all the records on cars. I worked there. They also are one of the shadiest companies I've ever worked for. At least at some little dealer you know they are lying, but Carmax acts like they do all kinds of inspections and service, but they don't. The only thing they always do is oil changes. A lot of times they will do air filters too. Other then that they only replace something if it is out of spec or they can't hide it. [...] I have actually witnessed them spraying undercoating on clamp marks (frame damage) to hide it. While I worked there I saw two buyers sue them for selling frame damaged cars. " Below is a normal appearance engine bearing wear (according to engine bearing specialists): Uniform wear pattern over approximately 2/3 of the bearing’s surface. Wear should diminish near the parting line ends of the bearing, and the wear pattern should extend uniformly across the bearing in the axial direction. Your bearings fit in that category and show no abnormal wear. Conclusion : Another wrongly diagnosed bearing paranoia thread. |
|||||
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2015, 09:39 AM | #34 |
Brigadier General
3938
Rep 3,980
Posts |
You can upload the video to youtube and then most the link here.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2015, 09:46 AM | #35 |
Lord Scrip
1812
Rep 3,013
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: LA,Ca
|
Gotcha, thanks!
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2015, 10:40 AM | #36 | ||||||
Lord Scrip
1812
Rep 3,013
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: LA,Ca
|
Quote:
__________________
|
||||||
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2015, 10:58 AM | #37 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
3387
Rep 7,541
Posts |
I can't imagine you ever recovering the money you spent replacing the bearings with a lawsuit. What you did was preventative maintenance in my opinion (aside from the fact that bearings shouldn't really fall into this type of category). The warranty company has no obligation to you unless there was an actual failure. A noise that you think is abnormal doesn't necessarily signify, beyond a reasonable doubt, that this motor wouldn't have continued to function without issues through the warranty period. That coupled with how the bearings look - better than most of them I've seen, are going to make your chances of recovery impossible.
If I were you, I would chalk this up as something you wanted to replace, and not make this a legal matter. I think that will just be a waste of time and thrown out of court if you decide to pursue it. That said, I'm glad the noise is better and hope your s65 continues to purr for years to come.
__________________
-----| Like us on Facebook | Instagram || Tuning Information | Remote Coding |----- ----Visit us at www.BPMSport.com - Emotion. Driven. | Toll Free: (888) 557-5133---- |
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2015, 11:02 AM | #38 | |
Lord Scrip
1812
Rep 3,013
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: LA,Ca
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2015, 11:09 AM | #39 |
Banned
62
Rep 1,381
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2015, 11:40 AM | #40 | |
Lieutenant
320
Rep 581
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2015, 11:46 AM | #42 | ||
Lord Scrip
1812
Rep 3,013
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: LA,Ca
|
Quote:
__________________
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2015, 11:49 AM | #43 |
Lieutenant Colonel
427
Rep 1,947
Posts |
When did burden of proof in civil court become "beyond reasonable doubt?" I always thought it was "a preponderance of evidence" -- which is a much lower standard than beyond reasonable doubt.
|
Appreciate
1
|
05-21-2015, 11:51 AM | #44 | |
Lord Scrip
1812
Rep 3,013
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: LA,Ca
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|