|
|
02-24-2013, 09:40 PM | #1 |
Banned
19
Rep 426
Posts |
What is worse: Years or mileage?
I know conventional thought by most is to go based on the mileage primarly in determining the health of a car but I personally am in a situation where I have put 45k miles in 2 years and car still feels like new. Early oil changes, first owner, 10k mile air filters and spark plugs (excessive I know) and driven with a nice combination of cruising and aggression. Definetly have not babbied it.
Would a car treated the same hypothetically but 4 years old with even less miles be a better or healthier car from people's eyes or which would you choose if you take the warranty out of the picture 2 year old 50k miles 4 year old 25k miles ? |
02-24-2013, 09:47 PM | #2 |
Captain
208
Rep 651
Posts
Drives: 2008 Melbourne Red M3 Coupe
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Riverside, California
|
I would take the 4 year old car with 25k miles. In fact, I purchased an '08 with 25k miles in Dec 2011 (3 years old). From a buyers perspective, I got a good deal on a well maintained and gently used car. Not sure how I would feel as a seller.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-24-2013, 09:52 PM | #4 |
Banned
19
Rep 426
Posts |
I forgot to add my hypothesis in terms of driving it pretty hard everyday for a shorter amount of time gives the drive-train more stress but at the same time I wonder if driving it consistently keeps things moving consistently enough compared to sitting for longer periods of time with no activity. Seems like engines run really consistently and if taken care of continue running well.
I don't honestly know what I would choose if I bought a used car but just curious |
Appreciate
0
|
02-24-2013, 09:54 PM | #5 |
Captain
51
Rep 698
Posts |
I would say mileage is worse. Wear and tear...
__________________
2011 E93 - Space Gray - 6MT/Silver Novillo/
OE Tuning/Gruppe M Intake/ACS Springs/Vorsteiner CF Type I Rear Diffuser/Textured Matte Black Custom Powdercoated OEM 359s/Painted Reflectors/Matte Grille, Hood Vents and Side Markers/Arqray Race Exhaust/MS Pulley |
Appreciate
0
|
02-24-2013, 10:16 PM | #6 |
First Lieutenant
40
Rep 361
Posts |
Agree with everyone else. All other things equal, mileage is usually worse than age, especially given your 2-4 year age range. Now 2 years, 50k vs. 10 years, 25k, I'd think the years would be worse.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-24-2013, 10:33 PM | #7 |
Brigadier General
594
Rep 4,488
Posts |
Mileage IMHO is worse unless it's outweighed for a buyer by years because they just have to have some feature that's only available in a newer model year car, e.g. newer iDrive, Combox, etc. Lower mileage doesn't necessarily mean that it was only ever driven hard. 25K miles in 4 years could be someone who worked from home and/or had the M3 as a weekend car.
Most issues crop up on a car with miles, not time. Manufacturers come out ahead on warranties for precisely that reason -- most customers fall out of their warranty periods on time, not mileage. Between your options, assuming both cars had the same options and same maintenance and driving patterns (if I could somehow know that for certain), I'd pick the 4-year-old car. But if you're considering changing how you use your car to optimize for resale value, you're missing the point. Go out and optimize for your own enjoyment!
__________________
'16 Cayman GT4 (delivery pics, comparison to E92 M3 write-up)
Gone but not forgotten: '11.75 M3 E92 Le Mans | Black Nov w/ Alum | 6MT (owned 5/2011 - 11/2015) Last edited by jphughan; 02-24-2013 at 10:42 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-24-2013, 10:40 PM | #8 |
Brigadier General
649
Rep 4,323
Posts |
Mileage is always worse.
__________________
CURRENT: 2017 RS3 (miss you guys)
SOLD: 2012 335i Mineral Gray M Performance Exhaust/Brakes/Suspension/LSD|Bav Stage 1/AMP||ER CP/IC/DP/OC | Dinan CAI/N55 PWG BIG TURBO|BMWF30.com |
Appreciate
0
|
02-24-2013, 11:34 PM | #10 |
Lieutenant General
7485
Rep 12,307
Posts |
Mileage is worse. BUT the biggest thing is how the car was taken care of. You could have a 1 year old car with under 10k that was beaten like a Mexican mule.
In terms of the E9x specifically, if they are well taken care of, everything should be ok.
__________________
Current:
16 F82 M4 GTS, Black Sapphire/Black, DCT 08 E92 M3, Sparkling Graphite/Bamboo Beige, 6MT 07 E85 Z4M Roadster, Alpine White/Red, 6MT 99 E36 M3, Techno Violet/Dove Grey, 6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
02-24-2013, 11:35 PM | #11 |
Member
43
Rep 268
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-24-2013, 11:49 PM | #12 |
Lieutenant
22
Rep 422
Posts |
In most cases I agree that it would be mileage. I think sometimes the thermal cycles on a car can be worse than the mileage. If the 4 year old car was a daily driver used to commute 5 miles to work every day, then that's worse than 50k miles of mostly freeway miles in 2 years. Also a 4 year old car might have spent more time outdoors in the sun and rain.
I would rather have a car that was driven 500 times with each trip 100 miles for a total for 50,000 miles in 2 years versus a car that was driven 5000 times and driven for 5 mile each trip for a total for 25,000 miles in 4 years. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-25-2013, 12:12 AM | #13 |
Major
272
Rep 1,178
Posts |
Cars depreciate by miles, not years
__________________
2002 E46 M3 Coupe.. SOLD
2011 BMW 1M Coupe SOLD 2013 BMW M3 Coupe SOLD 2014 BMW 335i MPPK SOLD 2015 M3 SOLD |
Appreciate
0
|
02-25-2013, 12:42 AM | #15 |
Private First Class
23
Rep 159
Posts |
low mileage (just add extended warranty)
__________________
Jerez Black: 6MT: Lux: 35% Tint: IND gills ,grill , reflectors: K&N Filter: ACM exhaust mod: Dinan pulley
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-25-2013, 01:01 AM | #16 |
Grease Monkey
293
Rep 2,646
Posts
Drives: 2011 E90 M3,1994 Euro E36 M3/4
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada
|
I am pretty sure that they depreciate with both miles and years!
To the OP, Mileage is going to be worse provided that the maintenance was equal on both. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-25-2013, 05:51 AM | #18 |
Low Pro...
35
Rep 1,067
Posts |
Not much to argue... miles. Now, in my case, my car has 28k in almost 2 years with 3 very long trips in between (about 2500 each) and daily commutes of 50k while in use. If I was a buyer looking at my car, it would certaintly be a great choice. However, a 2yr M with 15k may be a better choice.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-25-2013, 06:23 AM | #19 |
New Member
0
Rep 9
Posts |
Would not agree here with everyone. It is little more to analyze, not just miles or years.
I had to make the same choice and gone for "years". The choice was in between 2009 3 series LCI with 70k in Germany & 2007 with 35k in a homecountry. My choice was made for 2009 3 series LCI with 70k in Germany, because: 1) LCI vs pre-LCI model; 2) 70k on German autobahns is much better than 35k on our homecountry roads or read as citymode. As we do not have many highways. 3) and of course mods & options car has; 4) Clear dealer's history. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-25-2013, 06:28 AM | #20 | |
Private First Class
15
Rep 154
Posts |
Quote:
I still agree that lower miles is better. More because the paint/leather condition is almost always directly related to miles.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-25-2013, 06:50 AM | #21 |
Lieutenant Colonel
72
Rep 1,804
Posts |
Mileage without a doubt.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
2007 GT3 Clubsport w/CGT buckets in Scotland 2003 CSL, SG, Alcon BBK SOLD 2002 M5, SSII/Blk and bone stock. In storage back home in TX 2008 M3, AW/Blk 6MT, lots of track stuff SOLD |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|