|
|
05-25-2020, 02:15 PM | #1 |
Colonel
218
Rep 2,702
Posts |
Contemplating trading in my e92 m3
I know this topic has been talked about over and over again but I'm still torn after reading the forum and watching all these YouTube videos.
I have a 2013 zcp e92 m3 with 29k miles. A local dealership just took in a 2016 f80 m3 with only 28k miles. Nicely equipped. Pros and cons? I hear stories about people coming back. Lead me to the light!!
__________________
Cars: SGM 325i l BSM 135i l SS to Gloss White S2000 l Arctic White RS4 l White GTi l AW 335d M-Sport l IS 350 l e92 M3 l F80 m3
|
05-25-2020, 02:49 PM | #2 | |
Brigadier General
3968
Rep 3,390
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Not a Doctor, those are just my initials.
|
|
Appreciate
1
G80indy1713.00 |
05-25-2020, 02:53 PM | #3 | ||||
Colonel
218
Rep 2,702
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Cars: SGM 325i l BSM 135i l SS to Gloss White S2000 l Arctic White RS4 l White GTi l AW 335d M-Sport l IS 350 l e92 M3 l F80 m3
|
||||
Appreciate
0
|
05-25-2020, 03:13 PM | #4 | |
Captain
781
Rep 914
Posts
Drives: Silverstone E92 M3
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
__________________
2008 SSII E92 M3 | LCI CIC, Apps, Tails| MPE | BBS Ch-R
1990 325i Sold- 2011 335i Sedan | 6MT | Wavetrac | Eibach Pro | CDV delete | Cobb | BSW Sudden death - 1970 BMW 2002 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-25-2020, 03:56 PM | #5 | |
Major General
5860
Rep 6,631
Posts |
Quote:
With the f80 you'll probably get more reliability, updated tech, better chassis and diff, a faster motor and car, more torque to can feel, better brakes, oil up to temp faster, more aggressive looking, arguably better interior and more space, and better gas milage. You'll lose steering feel, induction noise, V8, exhaust, higher revving, smaller size, more linear feeling motor, pulling harder the more you rev, and character. I think honestly the biggest upside is reliability and the chassis and torque make the car more fun at lower speeds or when the engine is still cold. Character of the s65 goes a long way though. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-25-2020, 03:58 PM | #6 |
///M Powered for Life
11421
Rep 10,296
Posts |
I have an F80 CS along my E90 and E92. I've also driven the m2c.
For the street, E9X 100%. The advantage I see to the F8X generation is limited to the race track, but those advantages do not translate well to street use. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-26-2020, 01:34 AM | #7 |
First Lieutenant
535
Rep 364
Posts
Drives: 2011 AW E92 ZCP 6MT
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Snohomish, WA
iTrader: (1)
Garage List 2021 Toyota Tacoma [0.00]
2020 BMW X5 [9.00] 2020 Subaru WRX [0.00] 2019 Ford Raptor [0.00] 2011 BMW M3 [0.00] |
Last Sept I sold my daily driven 2016 F80 to my best friend. 8 months later I was lucky enough to acquire a low mile 2011 ZCP 6MT Stripper.
For convenience, tech and farts, the F80 is good. For driving experience and smiles per gallon as a weekender, E92. They visited today and both were in my driveway. I am happy to report that while I enjoyed the F80, I LOVE my E92. It's not going anywhere.
__________________
AW 2011 E92 ZCP 6MT single hump w/speed cloth.
Alpine Stage 2 | Apex Manufacturing X-Pipe | Corsa | BayOptiks | Haimus Racing CF Plenum MW 2020 G05 X5 with delicious coffee interior |
Appreciate
0
|
05-26-2020, 06:24 AM | #8 |
Gone Fishin’
7315
Rep 12,125
Posts |
I owned a launch 2015 M3 and a Comp pack M4 after owning my first two e9x. I thought the comp pack would fix all the issues of the launch car (sound, numbness, power band feel) but it didn't. I just got no love for the new model after 40k miles of seat time.
They do look good. Thats about all the new cars are worth to me. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-26-2020, 06:27 AM | #9 |
Gone Fishin’
7315
Rep 12,125
Posts |
To me its the exact opposite. The torque and fanciness make the F8x a good street car but if Im out railing on something I want the visceral experience of the e9x.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-26-2020, 11:57 AM | #11 |
Gone Fishin’
7315
Rep 12,125
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-26-2020, 11:59 AM | #12 |
First Lieutenant
183
Rep 305
Posts |
OP- And there's your real world experience from someone who did it.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-26-2020, 01:43 PM | #13 | |
Lieutenant General
7436
Rep 12,293
Posts |
Quote:
Regarding trading the E9x, the only car I'd consider would be the M2C. That car is good fun, and even then I think it would only be to add. Th E9x M3 still ticks way too many boxes for me.
__________________
Current:
16 F82 M4 GTS, Black Sapphire/Black, DCT 08 E92 M3, Sparkling Graphite/Bamboo Beige, 6MT 07 E85 Z4M Roadster, Alpine White/Red, 6MT 99 E36 M3, Techno Violet/Dove Grey, 6MT |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-26-2020, 02:27 PM | #14 |
Captain
465
Rep 804
Posts
Drives: Some fun stuff
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Philly, PA
|
This is your problem. No one is going to be able to tell you what you'll like. Take it for a test drive and see what you think. The F8x cars drive a fair amount differently than our cars. Some people like the F8X more and others like the E9X more.
If you test drive an F8X and still can't make heads or tails of it, see if you can Turo one for a weekend. And if you still can't figure it out after a couple of days behind the wheel, the F8X probably isn't worth getting. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-26-2020, 07:47 PM | #15 |
Enlisted Member
26
Rep 35
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-26-2020, 08:05 PM | #16 | |
Lieutenant General
11575
Rep 12,714
Posts |
Quote:
obviously, you're observation holds more weight because you actually own both. on a side note, when i did one of those M track days at thermal club, the m2 was my favorite car there.
__________________
Instagram; @roastbeefmike
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-26-2020, 08:23 PM | #17 |
Captain
852
Rep 658
Posts |
and the E9X feels like a luxury cruiser compared to the E46..... with every generation, cars get bigger, heavier, more electronics etc that take away from the driving experience. IMO E9X is the last true M car with a beautiful motor and it sounds like you have a great example. They're becoming harder to find, unlike the F chassis M cars which are dime a dozen.
__________________
2005 Phoenix Yellow E46 M3 6MT Coupe
2007 Imola Red Z4 M Coupe 2013 Interlagos Blue E92 M3 6MT ZCP CF roof |
Appreciate
0
|
05-26-2020, 08:50 PM | #18 |
///M Powered for Life
11421
Rep 10,296
Posts |
It is much more powerful. This translates very well to the track, where you have predetermined shift points and can be WOT for 15 seconds at a time.
In the real world, all you get is no response no response no response then holy moly response. I've done some back to backs in mountain roads and highway use on the phone with my brother with the E92 which is way down on power and the E92 is more effective there for sure. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-26-2020, 08:58 PM | #19 | |
///M Powered for Life
11421
Rep 10,296
Posts |
Quote:
In the racetrack you're over 5k more of the time where lag is minimized. It's in the real world where the F8X annoys me, because I'm in 6th or 7th and go WOT to pass some moron in the 3rd lane and nothing happens in the F8X. I have to shift to 5th. In the E9X I don't downshift to pass. By the time the F8X is hauling ass the E9X has finished the pass. At the race track you can take advantage of the massive power difference. Somewhere I have two overlaid graphs of the E90 doing 2:06 at WGI with 275/35 square R1 tires on 10.5" wheels, MCS 3 way suspension and PFC BBK vs the F80 CS doing the same time with camber plates, 255/275 RE71 tires on stock wheels, stock suspension and front-only PFC BBK. The CS is so, so much faster in straights it is difficult to understand. On the street I find the CS useless and annoying. People think the F8X has a broader usable range, I argue the opposite. And the rear dust boots of the CS were carbonized after a single weekend. So much for the BS better brakes story every tom dick and harry mentions about the F8X generation. Two weekends ago my brother and I took the E92 and the CS to the mountains. This past weekend it was us and a bunch of 991 GT3s... we both went in a single car, the E92. With stock suspension, stock brakes. Speaking of the M2, I've tracked a student's and it works well. Two weekends ago besides the E92 and CS a friend came with a M2c, 6MT. Both my brother and I thought it had less lag than the CS. It's incredible value for sure, I'd love to have one and crush 991 GT3 RSs with a 57k car just for the hell of it. Back on topic, the 6MT does a good job of bringing some engagement back but if I had the CS, the E92 and the M2c and had to choose a car for carving up some canyons I would still pick the E92! The best of all the worlds is the E90 stroker! Of course!!
__________________
Last edited by SYT_Shadow; 05-26-2020 at 09:19 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
2
roastbeef11574.50 SnohoRaptor534.50 |
05-26-2020, 09:11 PM | #20 | ||
Colonel
218
Rep 2,702
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Cars: SGM 325i l BSM 135i l SS to Gloss White S2000 l Arctic White RS4 l White GTi l AW 335d M-Sport l IS 350 l e92 M3 l F80 m3
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2020, 11:45 AM | #21 | |
Captain
465
Rep 804
Posts
Drives: Some fun stuff
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Philly, PA
|
Quote:
Now what did remind me of what you're describing was the S58 in the x3M I drove. That thing didn't feel like it moved until over 4k rpms. That reminded me a lot of the S65 and something I didn't really like in a modern turbo car. I'm not saying you're wrong, but what I am saying is that people experience things in different ways depending on both where and how a vehicle is driven. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2020, 12:24 PM | #22 | |
///M Powered for Life
11421
Rep 10,296
Posts |
Quote:
There is no measuring stick as reliable as swapping cars in the middle of a mountain run. Or swapping cars during a track day. I also did the M track day and it was too slow to get any conclusions. I drove the M2/M3/M4 there and didn't buy an F8X until last year. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|