BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > General Automotive (non-BMW) Talk + Photos/Videos
 
BPM
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      10-31-2013, 02:48 PM   #45
Meeni
Gateropode
Meeni's Avatar
329
Rep
2,848
Posts

Drives: BMW 330i 06
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: TN

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Efthreeoh View Post
Part of evolution is extinction. The hype of the CO2/Global Warming/Climate Change debate is the pro-global warming people are trying to prevent the extinction of Humans at some point in the future by controlling the inputs to the "climate" now,
And again you completely miss the point. No scientist will tell you we are on the brink of extinction. Climate change is not in 10000 years, its in 50. It will not make us extinct, it will just make our lives miserable for the time it takes for our infrastructure to adapt (we are talking about relocating millions of people, moving farm production north, etc, so its pretty cataclysmic, but nowhere near extinction threat).

Quote:
life evolves based on climatic conditions (changes) not the other way around.
So you say. There are numerous proof of the contrary. Humans (and other animals) can have a serious impact on the environment and modify it. Elephants can turn a savanna into a desert, sheep grazing can sterilize cold tundra, hell, Precambrian bacteria changed the composition of the atmosphere so much that they provoked their own extinction (there was no O2 originally in the atmosphere). Releasing massive amount of CO2 does have climate implications.

Quote:
I suggest you read some of his books on the subject.
I suggest you sample recent research on the subject, you'll see that 99% of the researchers (which are not tree-huggers or "liberals" whatever that means) agree on climate change, and 95% or so on human action as the primary cause. It's good you found a 1% guy
Appreciate 0
      10-31-2013, 04:00 PM   #46
ScarecrowBoat
Zooombie attaaack!!
ScarecrowBoat's Avatar
United_States
136
Rep
1,179
Posts

Drives: 328
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Santa Monica

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Efthreeoh View Post
We should end this as we are totally on opposite pages to where we are not understanding each other. I'm not sure what I've written would make you think I don't believe in evolution. I think what I've written shows that I do believe in evolution.

If you think I'm some sort of religious zealot that only believes in creationism, then you are sadly mistaken; and I'm offended. My position on this whole topic comes from many courses of study in, biology, anthropology, physics, geology, and astronomy. I also was a junior member of the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) in college - ties to my original discussion of ceramic engines.

Part of evolution is extinction. The hype of the CO2/Global Warming/Climate Change debate is the pro-global warming people are trying to prevent the extinction of Humans at some point in the future by controlling the inputs to the "climate" now, which all of my scientific understanding tells me is ridiculous. So in reality, people who support anthropogenic climate change actually don't believe in evolution, i.e. the classic Darwin model; life evolves based on climatic conditions (changes) not the other way around.

Scientists can create models of the climate to look forward with them and make predictions of disastrous climates in the future. But the validity of the models is not ascertainable with just a 100 years worth of recent climate observation and data. There is a climatologist at UVA, Patrick Michaels, who has taken the models and run them backwards to get the model's predictions of CO2 levels 10,000 years ago. He has then sampled sediments of lake beds known to be 10,000 years old, and through biological analysis of the plant matter existing in the sediments can measure the level of CO2 present in the atmosphere. His studies show the climate models used to predict the disastrous future are not valid to what actually happened in the past; the CO2 levels in the atmosphere 10,000 years ago was much higher than today and higher than predicted to be 100 years in the future. I suggest you read some of his books on the subject.
How many tens of dollars did that membership cost you?

Anyways, dig up whatever isolated experiments you want...humans can and do affect the climate. Anything to the contrary is simply silly. This doesn't mean it's 100% due to humans - maybe it's fractional, maybe it's a good percentage but it's somewhere between 0 and 100% and it cannot be 0. It is perhaps disingenuous to look at data and say wow, by 2050 all mammals are in danger of extinction unless we scale back C02, but pumping awful chemicals and smog out of our cars, factories, and cargo ships is not making anything better for the earth, the climate, or our bodies. The position you are taking that you "don't believe in anthropogenic global warming" is the most absolutist statement in regards to climate change you can make. You either are, or should be, a lobbyist for the oil and gas industry.
Appreciate 0
      10-31-2013, 06:38 PM   #47
Efthreeoh
General
United_States
16942
Rep
18,578
Posts

Drives: The E90 + Z4 Coupe & Z3 R'ster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meeni View Post
And again you completely miss the point. No scientist will tell you we are on the brink of extinction. Climate change is not in 10000 years, its in 50. It will not make us extinct, it will just make our lives miserable for the time it takes for our infrastructure to adapt (we are talking about relocating millions of people, moving farm production north, etc, so its pretty cataclysmic, but nowhere near extinction threat).


So you say. There are numerous proof of the contrary. Humans (and other animals) can have a serious impact on the environment and modify it.

Elephants can turn a savanna into a desert, sheep grazing can sterilize cold tundra, hell, Precambrian bacteria changed the composition of the atmosphere so much that they provoked their own extinction (there was no O2 originally in the atmosphere). Releasing massive amount of CO2 does have climate implications.


I suggest you sample recent research on the subject, you'll see that 99% of the researchers (which are not tree-huggers or "liberals" whatever that means) agree on climate change, and 95% or so on human action as the primary cause. It's good you found a 1% guy
Yes the climate is going to change in 50 years, it's changing right now as we all consume electricity, and create CO2 so we can write about cars on the internet. The climate is supposed to change, it always has and always will, you just put some qualifier on it that it shouldn't change because it may make your life miserable. What an egoist you are. Its all okay for Precambrian bacteria to change the environment, go extinct and make it inhabitable for your animal family ancestors to become homo sapiens sapiens. So what 95% of elephants told the other elephants to stop trampling and eating the vegetation to prevent their climate change? What 95% sheep told the other sheep to stop grazing and sterilizing their climate? Apparently the sheep and elephants didn't listen.
Appreciate 0
      10-31-2013, 06:47 PM   #48
Efthreeoh
General
United_States
16942
Rep
18,578
Posts

Drives: The E90 + Z4 Coupe & Z3 R'ster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScarecrowBoat View Post
How many tens of dollars did that membership cost you?

Anyways, dig up whatever isolated experiments you want...humans can and do affect the climate. Anything to the contrary is simply silly. This doesn't mean it's 100% due to humans - maybe it's fractional, maybe it's a good percentage but it's somewhere between 0 and 100% and it cannot be 0. It is perhaps disingenuous to look at data and say wow, by 2050 all mammals are in danger of extinction unless we scale back C02, but pumping awful chemicals and smog out of our cars, factories, and cargo ships is not making anything better for the earth, the climate, or our bodies. The position you are taking that you "don't believe in anthropogenic global warming" is the most absolutist statement in regards to climate change you can make. You either are, or should be, a lobbyist for the oil and gas industry.
I'm sorry, but what is wrong with being absolutist?

I'm 100% for conservation, minimal pollution, and being the best stewards of the planet we can be, but to think we are all powerful to actually change the climate in a way that is more drastic or different than will happen anyway is a bit egocentric and not considering all aspects of the equation.

But, back to ceramic engines, I'm 100% for them.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:31 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST