|
|
11-26-2007, 03:04 PM | #6 |
Lieutenant
205
Rep 461
Posts |
Gabri343 I know you from the Italian forum where you write. Can you tell us better which is your personal opinion about the new M3 e92? I read your posts in this Forum and in the other two where I know you write and honestly I would prefer to read your opinion and not only to look at your "nice" finds..
just curious to ear your voice here.... regards Savage |
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2007, 04:07 PM | #7 | |
Reincarnated
245
Rep 4,227
Posts |
From m5board.com
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2007, 05:36 PM | #8 |
Brigadier General
1913
Rep 4,128
Posts
Drives: M235i & G30 540i
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boynton Beach
|
Video no longer available.
__________________
Lack of money is not the problem. It is merely a symptom of what's going on inside of you! - T Harv Eker
Follow me on Insta https://www.instagram.com/bmwm_life_/ https://www.instagram.com/autogiftua/ https://www.instagram.com/phoenixbmwlife/ |
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2007, 06:02 PM | #10 | |
Reincarnated
245
Rep 4,227
Posts |
Quote:
[u2b]v/vySMeqSH_Ds&rel=1[/u2b]
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2007, 01:29 PM | #11 | |
Private
11
Rep 79
Posts |
Quote:
I tested M3 for a few km on the road only and I was not satisfied...... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2007, 06:20 PM | #12 |
Expect the Unusual
259
Rep 1,344
Posts |
HOLY BAJESUS! The E92 M3 looks like it's standing still compared to the M6. I was hoping it would be only a few car lengths behind. It was like 50 car lengths behind. Could hardly even see the headlights. That is super disappointing. How can a car destroy another car with only 80 less horsepower so bad. That's, like, wow. Am I missing something here? My 330i could keep up with the M6 as well as that E92 M3 did. Was the E92 M3 in limp mode or something?
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2007, 06:54 PM | #13 |
Captain
94
Rep 844
Posts |
Well, seen as the M6 BMW official 0-62 time is 4.6 seconds and the M3 is 4.8 I cant see there being a noticeable difference between them in reality.
I havent got the in gear times but bearing in mind the 80bhp or so difference along with 1655kg (M3) and 1785kg (M6 Coupe, ragtop is over 2000!!) weights I'll be happy to take an M6 on should I see one when Im in my M3. Clearly this is either rigged or down to the driver. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2007, 07:21 PM | #14 |
Lieutenant General
611
Rep 10,407
Posts |
FWIW
Not being a big fan of the M6 I can't pull a bunch of specs out of my head or from the net for it. I have posted below a quick simulation using CarTest of M3 vs. M6. Both 0-X and rolling starts are included. The M6 is heavier but still boasts a significantly better power to weight ratio. The 9.3 s 0-100 mph result from CarTest seems to match the 9.4 number I found with a quick i-search. These airfield tests are often these roll-ons and the CarTest results include such roll-ons. I think they typically go like 60kph - 250kph or so. The simulations do indeed show the M6 pulling consistently on and widening the gap consistently vs. the M3. Simulations show about a 85 foot gap at 150 mph (150 mph for the M6)!
The M3 M-DCT results however is a totally different story - pretty much neck and neck hanging with the M6! Some time to speed contests and some time to distance in favor of each car. Go M-DCT! |
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2007, 07:43 PM | #15 |
Reincarnated
245
Rep 4,227
Posts |
Did you read the whole thread?
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2007, 04:26 AM | #16 | |
Lieutenant
205
Rep 461
Posts |
Quote:
I will be there on that circuit on Thursday for the test .. bye |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2007, 12:09 PM | #17 |
Private
11
Rep 79
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-30-2007, 01:36 PM | #18 |
Lieutenant
50
Rep 503
Posts |
Well, having tested the M3 against an M6, that video was not representative. It took the M6 running at well over 120mph to pull away from the M3, and then only gradually. Someone must have missed a gear or forgot that the M3 revs to 8400rpm...
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-30-2007, 01:50 PM | #19 |
Lieutenant General
611
Rep 10,407
Posts |
Like my simulation. Within about 1 second to 100 mph then the gap moves up to close to 3 seconds.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-30-2007, 01:57 PM | #20 | |
Lieutenant
50
Rep 503
Posts |
Quote:
I've upset a few people before by mentioning that my AMG ML63 puts up a damm good fight against an M6. I had a 20 mile race against one in Italy last summer and it wasn't until we were well above 150mph that the M6 had pulled 100yds or so on my SUV, below 100mph I could pull ahead slightly and then hold it behind until wind resistance dealt the killer blow above 120mph. That's what 100lb/ft more torque can do for you... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-30-2007, 03:18 PM | #21 | |
Captain
94
Rep 844
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-30-2007, 05:01 PM | #22 |
Major General
374
Rep 8,033
Posts |
I guess when you are wealthy, there are two ways you can make a contribution to the human race with the time you have in your hands:
1. Devote yourself to noble scholarly pursuits such as writing, arts, and/or science. 2. Devote yourself to noble motorsport pursuits such as racing and/or reporting for automobile publications. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|