BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Engine, Transmission, Exhaust, Drivetrain, ECU Software Modifications
 
BPM
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      01-18-2018, 09:00 PM   #1
jcolley
Lieutenant
United_States
378
Rep
413
Posts

Drives: 328
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Maine

iTrader: (1)

S65 Piston Oil Squirter Redesign

At risk of being flamed for causing mss hysteria:

99% of my experience is S85 with a handful of S65s. In 2009, the piston oil squirter was redesigned. This is a common part on the S65 and S85.

I have seen several S85s in of late with broken top ring lands and no other damage. Looking at the OEM piston ring end gap specs in comparison with what notable aftermarket ring companies recommend, the OEM rings are exceptionally tight. This leads me to wonder why the piston squirters were redesigned in the first place. Perhaps a better spray pattern, there is a notable difference in their design.

My theory (nothing more) is perhaps BMW set the ring gaps very tight to improve efficiency, relying on the fact that oil squirters were being incorporated to help keep piston temperatures under control. Perhaps after some time, they realized it wasn't quite optimal and refined it. A couple of people who have switched to the new style noted increased oil pressures after, possibly an indication of alteration of the spray and a smaller orifice nozzle...not my data...can't make any conclusions.

To digress a bit, on the engines I have rebuilt, I have stopped using OEM rings and switched to aftermarket (Total Seal) and follow their advice for setting ring gaps...it's nearly double that of the OEM rings. On leak down tests, compression tests, and dyno runs, I don't see any appreciable difference between the OEM and the TS rings as long as the Alusil is properly prepped for new rings. In fact, the TS rings seem to retain oil significantly better than the OEM rings.

So, the long winded question is, do any S65 owners change these out?

Do any of the dismantlers / rebuilders see the older style on the earlier motors?

Are there any examples of stock S65's popping ring lands? Oddly, on the S85, I've only seen this on the first two cylinders of either bank, so always 1,2,6, or 7.
Appreciate 0
      01-18-2018, 09:23 PM   #2
Green-Eggs
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
United_States
1439
Rep
1,614
Posts


Drives: BMW
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcolley View Post
At risk of being flamed for causing mss hysteria:

99% of my experience is S85 with a handful of S65s. In 2009, the piston oil squirter was redesigned. This is a common part on the S65 and S85.

I have seen several S85s in of late with broken top ring lands and no other damage. Looking at the OEM piston ring end gap specs in comparison with what notable aftermarket ring companies recommend, the OEM rings are exceptionally tight. This leads me to wonder why the piston squirters were redesigned in the first place. Perhaps a better spray pattern, there is a notable difference in their design.

My theory (nothing more) is perhaps BMW set the ring gaps very tight to improve efficiency, relying on the fact that oil squirters were being incorporated to help keep piston temperatures under control. Perhaps after some time, they realized it wasn't quite optimal and refined it. A couple of people who have switched to the new style noted increased oil pressures after, possibly an indication of alteration of the spray and a smaller orifice nozzle...not my data...can't make any conclusions.

To digress a bit, on the engines I have rebuilt, I have stopped using OEM rings and switched to aftermarket (Total Seal) and follow their advice for setting ring gaps...it's nearly double that of the OEM rings. On leak down tests, compression tests, and dyno runs, I don't see any appreciable difference between the OEM and the TS rings as long as the Alusil is properly prepped for new rings. In fact, the TS rings seem to retain oil significantly better than the OEM rings.

So, the long winded question is, do any S65 owners change these out?

Do any of the dismantlers / rebuilders see the older style on the earlier motors?

Are there any examples of stock S65's popping ring lands? Oddly, on the S85, I've only seen this on the first two cylinders of either bank, so always 1,2,6, or 7.
I thought the only different between the S85 and S65 oil squirters is the direction they squirt. S85's bend left while S65 bend right (or visa-versa). Was there more to the difference than that?

I know for the S85 stroker engines we do, we change them out to the S65 squirters so we can always order the same sets of pistons with the notch cut in the same side. That's easier than having to tell Mahle which side to cut the notch from.
Appreciate 0
      01-18-2018, 09:27 PM   #3
jcolley
Lieutenant
United_States
378
Rep
413
Posts

Drives: 328
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Maine

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Green-Eggs View Post
I thought the only different between the S85 and S65 oil squirters is the direction they squirt. S85's bend left while S65 bend right (or visa-versa). Was there more to the difference than that?

I know for the S85 stroker engines we do, we change them out to the S65 squirters so we can always order the same sets of pistons with the notch cut in the same side. That's easier than having to tell Mahle which side to cut the notch from.
Looking at the part numbers, I was under the impression they were shared between the two. I guess my actual question was really did the S65 ever ship with the older design.

I have old ones galore laying around (S85) and a brand new set (revised part number) in a newly assembled motor. Will take pics of both at the shop tomorrow.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST