BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Engine, Transmission, Exhaust, Drivetrain, ECU Software Modifications
 
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      12-01-2016, 07:54 PM   #199
Properstyle
Major
506
Rep
1,385
Posts

Drives: 2011 e90 ZCP m3
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Killeen, TX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BadBoostedBMWM3 View Post
Odd question,

Is that an app to measure 60-130mph time?
The p3 gauge from auto couture does that.
__________________
2011 E90m3 ESS G2, active auto x pipe, RK FULL E85, DD
2015 X5M Bootmod3, Downpipes, Mineral white-The wifes DD
1994 300zx 2jz Swapped slicktop- The toy/track car
Appreciate 0
      12-01-2016, 08:05 PM   #200
Properstyle
Major
506
Rep
1,385
Posts

Drives: 2011 e90 ZCP m3
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Killeen, TX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pro-AM3 View Post
ok, lets try to dumb this down for you even further.

We will discuss strictly the S65. With lets just say 100 octane race fuel, and lets just say 27* timing, how much volume of air does it require to make 700hp# 8k rpms, and lets just ask how much MASS air is required to make 700hp@ 8k rpms

we know that 8psi, 27* and 100 octane will be roughly 600hp @8k rpms from a 1100cfm centri s/c..

so educate me on how 11psi @8krpms will get 700hp on 100octane..

how much AIR are those turbos required to push?

See what im getting at yet? It doesnt matter how much smaller the turbos are, because there are 2 of them, but combined they still need to flow the air, whether you are calculating it by MAF or CFM, it still needs the same air, more even..

SOOOOOO..
What are you arguing here? I know I never said anything about the turbos not being more efficient than the supercharger so you really lost me with this one. Again since you haven't typed more than a sentence in any of your responses with out it being off on a tangent I don't even know what you attempting to prove here? I recall saying you can't compare what happens on a blower to a turbo setup a few post back as if they are equal. My last response spoke on the number of reason why you can't compare the two setups of saying why supercharged cars have failed vs the turbo using a boost as a measurement of why is a mistake. SOOOO you attempting to dumb down something that was never being argued is quite funny. SO why do we start with what you are trying to debate and we will go from there.
__________________
2011 E90m3 ESS G2, active auto x pipe, RK FULL E85, DD
2015 X5M Bootmod3, Downpipes, Mineral white-The wifes DD
1994 300zx 2jz Swapped slicktop- The toy/track car
Appreciate 0
      12-01-2016, 11:12 PM   #201
GabeS
Crazy!
GabeS's Avatar
1180
Rep
1,440
Posts

Drives: E93 M3/Mk4 Supra/X6M
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Las Vegas

iTrader: (1)

Both of you take that shit to private message
enough!
__________________
First "real" widebody M3 ever thread.[url]http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthread.php?p=17461963
Appreciate 1
      12-04-2016, 06:12 AM   #202
Pro-AM3
Lieutenant
71
Rep
460
Posts

Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Dover, DE

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Properstyle View Post
What are you arguing here? I know I never said anything about the turbos not being more efficient than the supercharger so you really lost me with this one. Again since you haven't typed more than a sentence in any of your responses with out it being off on a tangent I don't even know what you attempting to prove here? I recall saying you can't compare what happens on a blower to a turbo setup a few post back as if they are equal. My last response spoke on the number of reason why you can't compare the two setups of saying why supercharged cars have failed vs the turbo using a boost as a measurement of why is a mistake. SOOOO you attempting to dumb down something that was never being argued is quite funny. SO why do we start with what you are trying to debate and we will go from there.

You claimed that 11psi from the TT wasnt the same as 11psi from a s/c because it was at 4k instead of 8k rpms, and inherently safer. I have thoroughly explained how that is just plain wrong.
Appreciate 0
      12-04-2016, 01:26 PM   #203
Fatandre
Private First Class
102
Rep
188
Posts

Drives: BMW 850
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Iceland

iTrader: (0)

So from looking at this car and the other supercharger kits out there which one would you say is better?
I cant decide what to go with on my car.
__________________
BMW 850 (BDS)
Appreciate 0
      12-04-2016, 01:57 PM   #204
Weyne Masters
Lieutenant
Brazil
79
Rep
412
Posts

Drives: M3 LIME ROCK VT2-625
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Brazil

iTrader: (0)

If you have enough money like 15K-18K
Go to Turbo!
Appreciate 0
      12-04-2016, 07:10 PM   #205
SVH
First Lieutenant
SVH's Avatar
United_States
152
Rep
392
Posts

Drives: 2016 328i & 2011-e93 TT
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Long Island, NY

iTrader: (0)

More like $18,500 plus install costs, plus a lot of patience....
Appreciate 1
      12-04-2016, 07:26 PM   #206
L4ces
Major
L4ces's Avatar
United_States
337
Rep
1,489
Posts

Drives: 2008 E92 M3 Alpine White
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NJ - NY

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 M3  [0.00]
On a different note, I was hopping to hear and see some footage of this creation and still nothing.

Ping ping Luc! Didn't you have the GoPro?
Appreciate 0
      12-04-2016, 07:27 PM   #207
L4ces
Major
L4ces's Avatar
United_States
337
Rep
1,489
Posts

Drives: 2008 E92 M3 Alpine White
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NJ - NY

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 M3  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVH View Post
More like $18,500 plus install costs, plus a lot of patience....
How's your build coming along?
Appreciate 0
      12-05-2016, 07:43 AM   #208
Properstyle
Major
506
Rep
1,385
Posts

Drives: 2011 e90 ZCP m3
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Killeen, TX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pro-AM3 View Post
You claimed that 11psi from the TT wasnt the same as 11psi from a s/c because it was at 4k instead of 8k rpms, and inherently safer. I have thoroughly explained how that is just plain wrong.
Well let back up as I actually never said anything about 4k rpm turbo stress vs 8k sc tress as a comparison you may want to go back and read my comments. As I Said "let me know when you start seeing people with sc cars start races from 4100rpm" That is the only place I mentioned RPM in the argument.

UBER MAD stated "11 psi at 3500 rpm's affects the engine completely differently than 11 psi at 8500 rpm's. There is significantly more pressure and load on the engine internals. You can't just look at boost numbers and say " Oh well there are Supercharged S65's with 11 psi of boost so it will be ok". It's not apples to apples and people don't understand that from an engineering perspective. A piston will crack or a connecting rod will bend/brake from the extremely high cylinder pressures at lower rpms."


So from the start of this argument you are mixing two people up to begin with.


NEXT you can't not compare a TT setup to a SC setup. espically a water to air vs air to air setup.

I don't think you realize what efficiency is, which is what I was trying to help you understand with the comparison of power made by a smaller turbo at 11 psi vs a larger turbo at 11 psi. Twin 3076s will flow more air with less heat at 11 psi then a centrifugal blower that s being spun to 90k revolutions. You can not compare the two and say oh this car with a sc blew up at 9 psi on race gas so that twin turbo car at 11 psi is going to blow up on 11 psi with e85. Which was my point to begin with. Turbos are more efficient then centrifugal blowers. You have to account for parasitic lost and the strain put on the motor just to run the supercharger, where as the turbo is using what would have been wasted energy to make power.
__________________
2011 E90m3 ESS G2, active auto x pipe, RK FULL E85, DD
2015 X5M Bootmod3, Downpipes, Mineral white-The wifes DD
1994 300zx 2jz Swapped slicktop- The toy/track car
Appreciate 0
      12-05-2016, 10:04 AM   #209
SVH
First Lieutenant
SVH's Avatar
United_States
152
Rep
392
Posts

Drives: 2016 328i & 2011-e93 TT
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Long Island, NY

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by L4ces View Post
How's your build coming along?
Have some engine issues to clean up. Hopefully soon.
Appreciate 0
      12-07-2016, 04:56 PM   #210
Lucrecio84
Captain
Lucrecio84's Avatar
United_States
250
Rep
794
Posts

Drives: TTE92 m3/ F10 CP M5
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Anaheim, California

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by L4ces View Post
On a different note, I was hopping to hear and see some footage of this creation and still nothing.

Ping ping Luc! Didn't you have the GoPro?
No man, I got a new GoPro 5 sessions specifically to take to NoFlyZone, thought I had it charged and when I went to use it the day of, it died on me 5 minutes in. I had to take it back and get a new one because it wasn't charging right. Car is almost done getting tuned with the Syvecs now so when I get it back, I'm going to go play around in Mexico with a few cars so everyone can see how it runs.
__________________

GINTANI TWIN TURBO E92/F10 M5
Appreciate 0
      12-07-2016, 05:02 PM   #211
Lucrecio84
Captain
Lucrecio84's Avatar
United_States
250
Rep
794
Posts

Drives: TTE92 m3/ F10 CP M5
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Anaheim, California

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fatandre View Post
So from looking at this car and the other supercharger kits out there which one would you say is better?
I cant decide what to go with on my car.
In terms of power delivery it blows it away. There is no comparison, especially running e85. In terms of bang for your buck, with how inexpensive you can get supercharged kits for now the supercharged route is the way to go.
__________________

GINTANI TWIN TURBO E92/F10 M5
Appreciate 1
Patrón544.50
      04-13-2017, 09:16 AM   #212
L4ces
Major
L4ces's Avatar
United_States
337
Rep
1,489
Posts

Drives: 2008 E92 M3 Alpine White
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NJ - NY

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 M3  [0.00]
Whatever happened here?
Appreciate 0
      04-15-2017, 11:38 PM   #213
Lucrecio84
Captain
Lucrecio84's Avatar
United_States
250
Rep
794
Posts

Drives: TTE92 m3/ F10 CP M5
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Anaheim, California

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by L4ces View Post
Whatever happened here?
ended up bending 2 rods, motor is being built
__________________

GINTANI TWIN TURBO E92/F10 M5
Appreciate 0
      04-16-2017, 05:53 AM   #214
Weyne Masters
Lieutenant
Brazil
79
Rep
412
Posts

Drives: M3 LIME ROCK VT2-625
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Brazil

iTrader: (0)

Tô much torque For Stock engine!
Appreciate 0
      04-16-2017, 11:42 AM   #215
squartus
Major
United_States
314
Rep
1,017
Posts

Drives: 2010 E92 M3 6MT
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mississippi

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2010 E92 BMW M3  [10.00]
So an engine rebuild is prob going to be required for twin turbo builds, so deft raises the cost.
__________________


4.4L LC stroker/ESS VT2-625/Volk te37 sl's/AA exhaust/DSS Carbon Fiber driveshaft/ARH Headers.. etc
Appreciate 0
      04-16-2017, 12:27 PM   #216
LangRacingDevelopment
Private First Class
LangRacingDevelopment's Avatar
59
Rep
109
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Irvine, CA

iTrader: (0)

Those rods are pretty weak, that should be expected.
Appreciate 0
      04-16-2017, 04:24 PM   #217
L4ces
Major
L4ces's Avatar
United_States
337
Rep
1,489
Posts

Drives: 2008 E92 M3 Alpine White
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NJ - NY

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 M3  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucrecio84 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by L4ces View Post
Whatever happened here?
ended up bending 2 rods, motor is being built
Were rods ever suggested or did it ever come up as a possible weak point?
Appreciate 0
      04-16-2017, 06:47 PM   #218
Shredicus
Major
Shredicus's Avatar
529
Rep
1,122
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Spokane, WA

iTrader: (12)

Quote:
Originally Posted by L4ces View Post
Were rods ever suggested or did it ever come up as a possible weak point?
I remember asking early on in the build if he was planning on addressing the rods and he responded something to the effect of wanting to find the breaking point of the stock rods. I'm 99% sure he knew rods would give

edit: found the post
http://www.m3post.com/forums/showpos...99&postcount=4
Appreciate 0
      04-16-2017, 11:02 PM   #219
Lucrecio84
Captain
Lucrecio84's Avatar
United_States
250
Rep
794
Posts

Drives: TTE92 m3/ F10 CP M5
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Anaheim, California

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by squartus View Post
So an engine rebuild is prob going to be required for twin turbo builds, so deft raises the cost.
No motor build is needed if you wanna push 11lbs with e85. I could have ran 7lbs on 91 and been just fine.
__________________

GINTANI TWIN TURBO E92/F10 M5
Appreciate 0
      04-16-2017, 11:05 PM   #220
Lucrecio84
Captain
Lucrecio84's Avatar
United_States
250
Rep
794
Posts

Drives: TTE92 m3/ F10 CP M5
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Anaheim, California

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shredicus View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by L4ces View Post
Were rods ever suggested or did it ever come up as a possible weak point?
I remember asking early on in the build if he was planning on addressing the rods and he responded something to the effect of wanting to find the breaking point of the stock rods. I'm 99% sure he knew rods would give

edit: found the post
http://www.m3post.com/forums/showpos...99&postcount=4
Yea I knew I was definitely pushing the limits so it was only a matter of time. Doing titanium rods now, dropping compression to 10:1. Billet crank with cams and valve Springs. Going to push redline to 10m.
__________________

GINTANI TWIN TURBO E92/F10 M5
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST