|
|
05-02-2011, 05:02 PM | #1 |
Private First Class
18
Rep 121
Posts |
Stock M3 vs Stock TTRS
rolling start from 50 kmh (30 mph)
Video Stock is what counts right? And who cares about starting from 0 times Edit: Bonus vid, Stock m3 vs catless r8 Video Had some edc lag, it rained just before the race Last edited by birgppa; 05-02-2011 at 05:07 PM.. |
05-02-2011, 08:22 PM | #5 |
Enlisted Member
4
Rep 45
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-02-2011, 09:06 PM | #7 |
Brigadier General
98
Rep 3,246
Posts |
Well I've seen 2 M3's "stomp"an R8 at the track.
__________________
mods: track ready stuff
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-02-2011, 10:10 PM | #9 |
Lieutenant
235
Rep 576
Posts |
Those videos are so inaccurate especially cars are geared differently and a 1 sec head start will win the race. I didn't see signal to go or anything. But when one car is much faster than the other by seeing one car taking off first it does give an estimated rolling performance idea.
I feel at 60mph is usually 2nd gear redline for most cars. Rolling at 62mph in 3rd may be a better race. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-02-2011, 11:38 PM | #10 |
Major
122
Rep 1,202
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-03-2011, 03:26 AM | #12 |
Private First Class
18
Rep 121
Posts |
I was at about 3,5k rpm in second at 30 which is a bit low, lots of turbos pwned me thanks to their low end torque. All of them where tuned except the ttrs.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-03-2011, 11:55 AM | #16 |
Colonel
95
Rep 2,528
Posts |
I wasn't expecting such an ass kicking at all. Good kill
__________________
"But resist we much; we must; and we will much; about that be committed." ~Rev. Al Sharpton 2010 E92 M3|Silverstone II|M-DCT|NCSW|2MT|ZCW|ZPP|ZTP|302|507|Gas Guzzler Tax |
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2011, 03:24 PM | #17 |
Brigadier General
377
Rep 4,167
Posts |
Damn the m3 didnt do to bad with the r8...heh..
...and I bet if that TT was geared a bit different it might have been better in the 100 to 130 range
__________________
Audi R8 v10 Ford Raptor m3e46freak@yahoo.comfor all euro parts!! ebay/craigslist verified/ m3post/e46fanantics/m3forum/zpost/bimmerforum |
Appreciate
0
|
05-10-2011, 08:36 PM | #18 | |
Colonel
1596
Rep 2,148
Posts |
Quote:
Don't get me wrong, I'm not hating on the M3. The S4 has a pretty under-rated motor. M3's dyno somewhere around 320-350 at the wheels. S4 will dyno around 280-310 awhp. The S4, being super charged, is pretty tunable. Buy it for $50,000ish and a $1,500 tune and it putting 350-360whp or so. Tune the M3 and get +10whp. Stock for stock I hear you, but the combination of AWD and and low-end torque and the S4 will have 2+ car lengths to about 120mph. After that the M3 runs it down, but who cares about 0-150mph. In the real world the S4 is a pretty cool car. Better mpg and much, much better interior. I originally ordered a B8 S4, but Audi was having serious production issues (9 month build time). Loaded Audi was still $8,000 less than my stripped M3. I do agree the M3 is a better car, but don't be so quick to discount Audis. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-10-2011, 10:59 PM | #19 |
Captain
50
Rep 873
Posts |
B4 S4's
B5 S4's B8 S4's RS2's RS4's RS6 old and new R8 V10's I'd never think twice if I got roasted by either one in an E92 M3
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-10-2011, 11:20 PM | #20 |
Lieutenant Colonel
28
Rep 1,938
Posts |
R8 definitely has a bit more grunt. TTRS did okay through 2nd gear though. Considering it has AWD and quite a bit less rated HP, that's not too bad. M3 has it's weight penalty working against it.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-22-2011, 02:12 PM | #21 |
Private
0
Rep 79
Posts |
ignorance...you are loaded with it. I'm surprised to see you have an M3...the M3 guys are usually pretty classy and appreciate (and are knowledgeable about) other marques and models. Your comments are what I typically hear from the guys with an //M badge preceeding 323i.
The TTRS is bone stock, and is down about 75 hp to the M3. Still only by about 3 cars in a run to 150mph. Not bad. Tune that TTRS (just a tune) and it picks up an easy 80-100hp...and will put buslengths on the M3. Still, how about these two 11 year old RS4s vs the same M3? Their AWD managed well, despite your rule that no audis have anything from a roll. lol. Here's a modded M3 vs. a bone stock TTRS from a dig. Takes the M3 till about 150mph to catch up (or whatever the top of 5th gear is) Last edited by sakimano; 05-22-2011 at 02:31 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-22-2011, 05:08 PM | #22 |
Brigadier General
98
Rep 3,246
Posts |
Agree to some extent, although i bot this car because of its prowess around the track, if I wanted a stop light racer would've bot the c63. All cars in this class are pretty nice. As a matter of fact most cars are pretty decent these days.
__________________
mods: track ready stuff
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|