|
|
12-09-2013, 02:07 PM | #89 |
Retired BMW Genius
2895
Rep 3,404
Posts |
Yes, it has. Not sure what will replace it. I love the way it revs and the noise it makes. In the price range, nothing can come close. The only other car that come to mind is a 991 GT3 but, that's triple the price of the M. The way the car feels in your hands and communicates with you simply leave you breathless for a car of this time period. Surely, it's going to be missed.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-10-2013, 07:47 PM | #90 | |
Banned
2
Rep 48
Posts |
Quote:
SS Camaro for the win! Did you hate the cutouts after awhile? I had some of those but they started to leak, could smell it in the cabin, started hating that I put them on! What else did you do to it? Looks like a beast! Why did you sell it? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-10-2013, 08:30 PM | #91 | |
Brigadier General
380
Rep 3,934
Posts |
Quote:
car had cam, heads, long tubes, catback and Cutouts. TWS nurburgring rims with Mic Pilot SS 315 tires. BMR stage 2 suspension. put down 490WHP on dyno. she was a monster. it was one of those things where you experience and you lust for something different.(had the car for over 3 years) i wanted something i could daily drive, have some luxury, and enough performance where i didn't want to change it. i loved the M3 in that sense. the second i sat in the M3 i knew it was the car. LOVED the high revving engine also camaro was rough to drive, and i didn't want to daily drive it. i leased a 328i at that time. the camaro did more sitting than anything else. i also worried about the car to much. with that much work done is hard not to care about the car. if i could have m3 and my camaro i would! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2013, 06:58 PM | #92 | |
Banned
2
Rep 48
Posts |
Quote:
I am like you although I love the M3 I gotta tell you, I saw a ZL1 the other day and I was drooling over it and looking at it from all angles until I realized there was an old guy sitting in it laughing at me. He was cool he got out and showed me around the car....man that car is sex. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2013, 08:55 PM | #93 | |
Brigadier General
380
Rep 3,934
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2013, 10:15 PM | #94 |
Major
144
Rep 1,440
Posts |
OP, i share your sentiments. The S65 has well and truly screwed me up. I test drove the 991 C2S and felt it was a downgrade. It sounded awful next to the S65. I don't care how much quicker it goes round a track, but the sound it made was unacceptable for the price premium it commands over the M3. I am planning to get a 991 GT3 and that's only because that engine revs to 9k rpm. It probably won't sound more melodic than the S65, but that rev limit is definitely respectable
__________________
- Frozen Grey F10 M5 DCT
- Rosso Corsa 458 Speciale Sold - Frozen Grey E92 M3 Sold |
Appreciate
0
|
12-12-2013, 12:40 PM | #96 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
1050
Rep 1,537
Posts |
Quote:
However, I have learned my lesson this time around and will stay with the current M3. I have thoroughly regretted selling my e36 and my e46 (a bit less...) and with this being the only high revving V8 M3 ever, I will stick with it even though a potential M2 could be very interesting. And I have a stripper M3 in white "only". To each their own, M cars will always have a strong following with people that have strong opinion, hence why this forum and others are mostly entertaining. I have driven previous GT3s and unlike our M3, it is not a very practical car and less forgiving, different crowd and $$$$$$$$$. Happy motoring! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2013, 05:17 PM | #97 |
Private First Class
10
Rep 191
Posts |
I have owned a lot of cars, and over the years have honed my mental 'specs' as to what a car would be like if I were the designer. M3s, as a class, are my kind of car, and the E92 is very close to ideal. A 10% smaller V8 and 20% less total weight would be nirvana.
I bought mine from a dealer in another state without even having driven one (a brief ride the previous year was my only in-car experience). There were things about my previous E46 version I preferred, like the window lifts on the console, openable rear windows, the overall smaller package, ... but the E92 is better in most ways. And like others have said, the longer I own it, the more I get attached. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2013, 11:35 PM | #98 | |
Brigadier General
380
Rep 3,934
Posts |
Quote:
i would be looking at next generation. which i know nothing about! although that idea is pretty good. i hope they will have some at the Detroit auto show which i am going to. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2013, 04:59 AM | #99 | |
2nd Asst to Dept Undersecretary
6704
Rep 1,298
Posts
Drives: People crazy
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Florida
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2013, 05:32 AM | #100 |
Brigadier General
384
Rep 3,450
Posts |
wish i could drive them one day.
__________________
"Well, there's a straight-six engine at the front, a manual gearbox in the middle and drive goes to the back. That's Page 1, Chapter 1 from the petrosexual handbook" - JC
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2013, 11:56 AM | #101 | |
Brigadier General
380
Rep 3,934
Posts |
Quote:
although i think your V10 statement is kind of childish. some people like the V10 sound and more power. its more than 0-60. V10 shines on the highway pulls also. personally i would want the V10 but if it came down to it i would be happy with the V8. gotta respect both engines man. i am pretty sure deep down in side most would take a R8 V8 or V10 over a M3. no need to even comment on that. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2013, 12:10 PM | #102 | |
Major
143
Rep 1,129
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2013, 12:20 PM | #103 | |
Brigadier General
380
Rep 3,934
Posts |
Quote:
i think they are great cars regardless. i heard the next generation is going to be pretty al some also. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2013, 12:21 PM | #104 | |
Major
143
Rep 1,129
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2013, 12:26 PM | #105 |
Brigadier General
380
Rep 3,934
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|