|
|
05-24-2011, 07:34 PM | #89 | |
Lieutenant
114
Rep 540
Posts |
Rather than concocting a meaningless list of OE water cooled cars like a failed science experiment or dying argument, lets talk performance. Performance is why we supercharge our cars, correct?
Lets talk Porsche, no more Mustang, sorry guys. I would assume Porsche knows a little something about performance, F/I and racing. If you disagree please post a few valid points. Lets go back to 1978 and highlight the Porsche 935. Quote:
Wikipedia is not always the best source but above is a fact. Look it up, info is out there. As we all know all recent Porsche's are air to air. See how easy that is. _____ I'm pretty sure Jaypod is on the correct side of the fence. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-24-2011, 07:37 PM | #90 | |
All I do is Win... Eat Race Sleep
152
Rep 2,184
Posts
Drives: 2018 Range 2011 M3 2019 600lt
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Jersey
|
Quote:
__________________
Rs7 : 10.4 133.50 with a 1.7 60ft Toyo R888 F10 M5: 11.308 131.96 with a 1.9 60ft Street Tires E90 M3: 11.2 126.7 with a 1.8 60ft Street Tires |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-24-2011, 08:21 PM | #96 |
Lieutenant
114
Rep 540
Posts |
If it is a battle of dyno charts you're looking for, then you can have that battle... Glory runs really mean nothing to me nor do I have to time to play such silly games.
You win... Thanks for acknowledging my post with healthy discussion... Obviously you are not capable of such things... Keep in mind history has a funny way of repeating itself. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-24-2011, 08:21 PM | #97 |
Custom User Title
9
Rep 105
Posts |
Come on now, AJ -- I don't have a dog in this fight. And last I checked AA doesn't even have a dynojet. Besides, that ESS run I posted could be considered a glory run of its own (IMG's dyno after getting a flash-loader and new custom tune).
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-24-2011, 08:25 PM | #98 |
Second Lieutenant
29
Rep 230
Posts |
Reality is no customer of AA's E9x M3 Stage 2+ has ever come close to the 530whp they claim, we have many customers in the 580-600whp range on a kit we claim makes 530whp.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-24-2011, 08:27 PM | #99 |
All I do is Win... Eat Race Sleep
152
Rep 2,184
Posts
Drives: 2018 Range 2011 M3 2019 600lt
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Jersey
|
And reality should set in when your stage 1 535 kit that puts up more hp than me can't even break 120 mphs?
__________________
Rs7 : 10.4 133.50 with a 1.7 60ft Toyo R888 F10 M5: 11.308 131.96 with a 1.9 60ft Street Tires E90 M3: 11.2 126.7 with a 1.8 60ft Street Tires |
Appreciate
0
|
05-24-2011, 08:29 PM | #101 |
Custom User Title
9
Rep 105
Posts |
I'll give you that, so I could be eating my words later when there are more than 2 or 3 AA customer dynos. For now I'm not aware of a reason I shouldn't give AA the benefit of the doubt.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-24-2011, 08:33 PM | #102 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
966
Rep 13,780
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-24-2011, 08:40 PM | #103 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
342
Rep 1,805
Posts |
Quote:
What's up with a 600whp graph? Stock exhaust ? I think both kits are great , but Till they run side by side...everyone should relax
__________________
17' M2 DCT - KW CS - Re71r - Carbotech
BW C13 - 1:57:2 ACS - 1:49:6 WSIR - 1:30:6 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-24-2011, 08:40 PM | #104 |
Private
0
Rep 84
Posts |
Let's not forget the years of manipulative marketing like using the same exact dyno chart for 2 different model cars (e46 e92) and posting it on forums trying to show power gains. If that doesn't kill a vendors credibility then I don't know what does!!! They have years of no proof dyno's, ESS is not new. Where were you guys 5 years ago when they would show bs dyno charts??
It is a fact that the most audible ESS guys on this forum have flash loaders with race files!! Come on now! Since AJ thinks he is superior to the world and is very unprofessional. Here is a AA S54 car. Show me your S54 now! |
Appreciate
0
|
05-24-2011, 08:42 PM | #105 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
177
Rep 1,783
Posts |
Quote:
No need to attack a forum member, they are the very reason we are all in business. We have posted another thread with dyno information that you too can refer to. While we do commend you on building a good air to water system we decided to go the route best suited for street use. The fact is Jean has brought up some legitimate points and you continue to refer back to making X horsepower and have nothing to say regarding air to water systems or how extremely inefficient they become after a run or two.. Lastly to make it worse you have resorted to attacking fellow enthusiasts. Thanks to everyone who was able to participate in this discussion and keep it on a mature level Best Regards, p.s. ... And Jean is right AJ, history does have a funny way of repeating itself |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-24-2011, 08:44 PM | #106 | |
Second Lieutenant
29
Rep 230
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-24-2011, 08:47 PM | #107 | |
Second Lieutenant
29
Rep 230
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-24-2011, 08:49 PM | #108 | |
Second Lieutenant
29
Rep 230
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-24-2011, 08:50 PM | #109 | |
391
Rep 3,149
Posts |
Quote:
Come back and post up when your 625 HP kit can do the following. These are real world results of customers cars. Coming into a thread and marketing your kit as having a better design than ours when you have not got close to any of our benchmarks was a bit pre-mature. 6.7 sec 60-130 11.30 @ 129.34 MPH 1/4 mile 600 whp SAE All I have seen so far from you in this thread is creative marketing and the proof that you can make more power than your customers on a dyno. Anytime you want to run your stage 2+ against our VT2-625 you let me know and I will make the arrangements. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-24-2011, 08:53 PM | #110 | |
Banned
115
Rep 2,682
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|