|
|
03-24-2008, 12:26 PM | #639 |
Registered
0
Rep 1
Posts |
i'm ivanlo, admin of motorio.us automotive forums and signed up here to support dooma350.
let's make an example of this dealer (but not through harassment) |
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 12:28 PM | #640 |
Registered
0
Rep 2
Posts |
Just joined,
Though I didn't have time to read all the pages....if you haven't been told, you have also made it to one of the largest Porsche board as well (Pelican). We are all multiple car owners, and I can't imagine anyone who has read this thread that would actually go to this dealership group and buy a car now... I'm in your corner...they should cave on the bad publicity alone, not to mention the legal issues! Note that when I registered and went to the main forums page, I noted that there are the usual range of people subscribed to threads...technical is highest (as would typically be so on a car board) at 168 people.... but this thread alone has OVER 2300 people watching right now!! Amazing what the internet can do... Good luck! Eric |
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 12:32 PM | #641 | |
Second Lieutenant
63
Rep 233
Posts |
Quote:
As of late Ebay has been very concerned with a lack of repeat buyers on their site which is the reason for their newly structured feedback system...the same system that was boycotted last month and a national worldwide story. Essentially Ebay's researchers have noticed that many buyers would end up having a negative experience on their site and as a result would not return. They are doing their best to change how people perceive their site. You not getting your car, would only confirm that their site is still not as well protected from these types of activities as they would like people to think. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 12:36 PM | #643 | |
New Member
0
Rep 7
Posts |
Quote:
I happen to care because the OP won an auction fair and square and the seller refuses to hold up their end of the deal. And that annoys me. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 12:40 PM | #645 | |
Registered
0
Rep 3
Posts |
Quote:
Maybe I oversimplify things, but when it comes to handling mistakes, my experience is that owning up to them right away puts you in a position to at least explain your actions and at the very least, beg for mercy if you really have to. FYI- I got this off the local drag racing forum in Guam where I spend my free time. I have also e-mailed links to friends in China, Malaysia, Philippines and Australia. http://www.dragguam.com/dragboard/ And I believe I saw a reference to this on the LS1 forums as well. After seeing posts from folks all over the world – Asia to Europe and all points in between, there is one thing I would like to give kudos to- All the car owners and rivals out there simply putting aside differences to pull for the common Joe. That has a pretty high coolness factor to me. Phil I am post # 666 but I hope the heartwarming post sort of EQ's that devil stuff out of the deal. Last edited by PhaseShift; 03-24-2008 at 12:48 PM.. Reason: Cant' spiel korrecktly |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 12:40 PM | #646 | |
Steve Forte Rio
149
Rep 2,393
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 12:41 PM | #647 |
Major General
152
Rep 5,124
Posts |
this thread is impossible to keep up with but is just awesome. i can't believe there have been over 214,000 views. Still no sticky? haha. I really hope that this goes somewhere and that BMW dealership gets screwed as they should.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 12:41 PM | #648 |
New Member
0
Rep 15
Posts |
I'm just curious to see how many "Nebraskans" that are in the market for a BMW in the next several years would no longer consider purchasing from Husker if they don't do the right thing?
I'm very curious to get some idea of the amount of business they may lose as a result of how they handle this "mistake". |
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 12:45 PM | #649 | |
Registered
0
Rep 2
Posts |
Quote:
However you did get something wrong, the terms on the listing states that they require a $1000-$5000 deposit within 24 hours of the auction ending. The 7 days is given to complete the entire transaction, not just a deposit. The 24 hour window to send them a deposit is already over. And you're obviously not going to send them the full payment by the end of the 7 days. I don't know how these terms will actually hold up considering the circumstances. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 12:46 PM | #650 |
Brigadier General
401
Rep 3,288
Posts |
+1 for supporting Dooma.
Since this thread has become very active and simply HUGE, maybe it would be a good idea to update the OP with the current state of things Dooma?
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 12:50 PM | #651 |
Huskers suck!
0
Rep 7
Posts |
It depends how much of this makes the news. It's not that hard to take a short drive right over to Omaha and buy a BMW for us Nebraskans.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 12:50 PM | #652 | |
Colonel
350
Rep 2,937
Posts
Drives: 2013 Estoril 328i M Sport
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 12:51 PM | #653 | |
New Member
0
Rep 15
Posts |
Quote:
It's been a few years since I was in my Business Law course, but I believe that when the dealership called Dooma 15 minutes after the auction stating they would not sell him the car they broke the contract at that moment. That would mean that Dooma doesn't need to worry about a down payment in 24hrs or even full payment in 7 days at this point as there is no contract in existence at the moment. The issue at hand is that the dealer backed out of the contract illegally and must reissue the same offer, at which point I believe the 24hrs/ full payment in 7 days conditions would come back into effect. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 12:52 PM | #654 | |
Registered
0
Rep 2
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 12:59 PM | #656 |
New Member
0
Rep 5
Posts |
I wasn't going to register and post anything, since I'm not a luxury car owner, but I have been following this since it was about 2 pages, and have read everything. And I had an idea. You know what would be really great way to end all this, especially given the PR hits that the dealership and eBay are taking?
What if we organized a fund for paying for the difference between the msrp and the auction price, and organized a party at the dealership. AND, what if we invited the CEO of BMW NA, and Meg Whitman of eBay(is she still there or gone already), to come and speak on behalf of their companies, and to reassure everyone that they will take steps to make sure that this doesn't happen again. Could you imagine? I bet the donations would pour in (even possibly from the companies themselves), so much so the OP might not even have to pay for his car, the dealership would get their money, the publicity would be unbelievable and positive, talk about a win for everyone. Is this a good idea? |
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 01:04 PM | #657 | |
Registered
0
Rep 3
Posts |
Quote:
I see your point and it is a cool concept, but I could not personally justify supporting the dealer in any way. Seems to me that sends the wrong message here if the dealer ends up getting out of the price they contracted to. My support lies with '350 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 01:06 PM | #658 |
Registered
0
Rep 1
Posts |
Public Pressure
Dooma, you've gotten a lot of great advice here. I've always believed one of the best ways to attack a situation like this is to show 'Husker Auto Group' how expensive welching on your auction can really become.
I think I speak for most everyone here when I say I'm willing to take a few minutes to make bidders on Husker's other auctions aware of how Husker does business... |
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 01:09 PM | #659 |
First Lieutenant
26
Rep 395
Posts |
Sounds like you have a good case. Be persistent - they're probably just trying to scare you off because the sad fact is that legal fees are often a deterrent for people (would you rather go through the trouble and spend the same $ or just get the car elsewhere now for the same amt? - they hope the latter).
I'm not familiar with rules for contract formation as they relate to sites like Ebay. Assuming their auction consitutes an offer and you're bid acceptance of that offer such that a valid contract was formed, you're in pretty good shape and should either be able to (a) get damages in the amout you pay for the car less the price you should have bought it from them), or (b) specific performance of their obligation to sell you the car. Doubtful that they have any defense to this. If it's a unilateral mistake on their part, the only real defense would be that it was an obvious mistake and any reasonable person would have realized it (basically, if the error had been egregious, say they offered it for $1000, then the law won't protect you if you were just trying to take advantage of an obvious mistake). This defense likely wouldn't apply in this situation. As others have mentioned, go through the BBB, BMW, and Ebay and see what happens. If it doesn't help, consult a lawyer (don't rely on the lawyers on this site as obviously these are just thoughts and impressions and not intended to be legal service). Last edited by Herms; 03-24-2008 at 01:41 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 01:10 PM | #660 |
Registered
0
Rep 4
Posts |
Ok, I apologize if any of this is a rehash, I've only made it to page 25 or so, but:
1) I am a lawyer. Not your lawyer. None of this is legal advice. I am not telling you what to do, yadda yadda yadda (that's legal speak.) I do not even deal with this kind of law. Hell, 5 months from now I will not deal with any kind of law. 2) I posted on bimmer.org about 8-10 years ago. So hello to any refugees from there. It was fun going through all the e46 mule spotting way back when. I don't see how morals fit into this, although certain people bring them up. I'd say it looks like the following occured: 1) Dealer puts M3 on ebay. Dealer hopes it will get bids from across the nation. Dealer is thinking this will net them a huge profit. 2) Dealer starts auction well below invoice to attract more attention. 3) Dealer screws up. Despite ebay saying, many times, to note the difference between "buy it now" and "reserve," some nitwit screws up. Instead of putting a reserve at their invoice, they do a buy-it-now. 4) They never cancel auction. 5) Doomer bids. Doomer wins. Doomer is happy. 6) Nitwit's boss is not happy. The bid is under the invoice. Dealer stands to lose a few thousand dollars on this. 7) Dealer stands to also lose significantly more in a lost-sale, as the M3 likely would have gone for at least $10k above this price. Seems like an decent estimate of the facts to me. Now earlier someone mentioned that this was a unilateral mistake. This is likely true. However, their analysis of a unilateral mistake was wrong. C'mon, even google will tell you what the legal difference between unilateral and bilateral. So the question might be did the OP have reason to know it was a mistake. One one hand, arguably, as the BIN was ridiculously low. On the other hand, the auction did brag about being ridiculously low. It could go either way. The thing is, the BIN was reasonable. I'll let you draw your conclusions. Lastly, this is nothing like getting too much change back. Nor is it like a contract bid, which has laws specifically written for those unique circumstances. This is a dealer hoping to get rich. This is a dealer hoping to put this M3 on ebay and have people in California and people in Massachusetts starting a bidding war and paying far more over the sticker than people in Lincoln, NE would. The dealer screwed up in a way that isn't wholly obvious to the buyer, and in a way they should have noticed and cancelled the auction when they had the chance. The dealer gambled that the car would fetch a huge amount of money, and it didn't. The gamble did not pay off. The dealer could have hedged this gamble by using a reserve, or by starting the bidding at the lowest they'd be willing to sell. The dealer didn't. Likely half out of greed and half out of pure stupidity. Should the law protect you from being too greedy? No. Should the law protect you from being stupid? Arguably, but in this case, where it was a car dealer that had done ebay auctions before? It would be hard to convince me that they needed protection from their own idiocy. Again, just a brief analysis. No legal advice, in fact I've tried hard to make no conclusory statements here. This is for discussion only. Solely that, nothing else. |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|