|
|
05-15-2009, 04:23 PM | #45 |
Private First Class
12
Rep 138
Posts |
The gears are $3K installed so $4k for everything installed is about right. I won't say "fair" because that is a lot of money but it is about what it costs. Some guys are dropping $3K for mufflers!
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2009, 07:34 PM | #47 |
Captain
36
Rep 625
Posts |
The main reason I was considering the 4.10 final drive was that on MOST back roads you never exceed 100 MPH, and you rarely go slower than 45 mph. Thus I am in third gear all the time. The 4.10 would still allow me to always be in third gear, but would effectively pull 6.5% harder all the time. On top of that, there is a sweet spot in the torque curve around 7000 RPM that I rarely get to see (too fast) so with the shorter gearing I'd hit the sweet spot more often and be able to say "Wheeeee!" a lot more!!!
Overall I think the gearing in gears 2-4 is too tall (105 MPH in 3rd, 140 MPH in 4th!!) that the shorter gearing makes it a lot better. One thing to consider: The DCT tranny goes 95 MPH in 3rd, 120 mph in 4th - and thus pulls better than our 6 MTs even with 4.10 . . .
__________________
Driving sideways: It's not faster, but damn it's more fun!
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2009, 08:11 PM | #48 |
Brigadier General
127
Rep 3,110
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2009, 09:24 PM | #49 |
Private First Class
12
Rep 138
Posts |
I agree that it seems to suit the range where I drive as well. Do you have a speed in gears chart for the M3 or know where to find that info?
There are really only two mods I'd like for the M3. One is the shorter rear gear and the other is a slightly more vocal exhaust. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2009, 09:34 PM | #50 | |
Captain
36
Rep 625
Posts |
Quote:
http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthr...hlight=gearing
__________________
Driving sideways: It's not faster, but damn it's more fun!
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2009, 10:02 PM | #51 | |
Captain
50
Rep 780
Posts |
Quote:
Here are the gear change points in km/h for the 4.10 FD:
Gear change calculations are based upon:
The M3 can't reach 312km/h stock but would be able to reach the top speed with the 4.10FD... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2009, 11:24 PM | #52 |
Private First Class
12
Rep 138
Posts |
Thanks for the table. I actually have 19" wheels but I'm guessing the overall diameter is the same.
Here are the same numbers converted to MPH: Stock 3.85 diff MPH: 41.6 71.2 106.7 141.6 168.8 193.6 4.10 diff MPH: 39.0 66.8 100.1 132.8 158.3 181.6 |
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2009, 12:52 AM | #53 | |
Captain
50
Rep 780
Posts |
Quote:
Anyway enough arguing about the finer points - I agree a higher FD greatly changes the dynamics of the car, and the car certainly should "feel" quicker as it will be more responsive. I'm seriously thinking about the DCT 3.62 Diff which is 15% shorter than stock... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2009, 12:53 AM | #54 |
Captain
50
Rep 780
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2009, 07:49 AM | #55 | |
Major General
286
Rep 6,007
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2021, 09:15 AM | #56 | |
Colonel
1207
Rep 2,026
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2021, 09:23 AM | #57 |
Lieutenant General
11586
Rep 12,728
Posts |
I'm sure after 12 years, they appreciate this info.
__________________
Instagram; @roastbeefmike
|
Appreciate
4
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|