|
|
|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
08-16-2011, 11:58 AM | #1 |
Lieutenant
19
Rep 562
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Sedan SSII/SN/DCT
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, TX
|
Horsepower wars coming to a close, weight wars begin. BMW fires first salvo
Featured on BIMMERPOST.com With the artificial restrictions being placed on auto manufacturers we may be witnessing the peak of horsepower in cars in the next few years. But I wouldn't cry too much because the answer to performance cars of the future could be in losing weight. If you had the choice, would you choose an M3 with the current 414hp rating but be 300lbs lighter, or a different M3 with 450hp and the current 3700lb weight? The thrust to weight would be exactly the same at 8.2lph. I think just about everyone here would take the lighter car with less horsepower. As we transition from the age of horsepower to the age of light weight material, I'll make a prediction that a new number will begin to dominate the discussion. Pounds per horsepower. With BMW investing in lightweight carbon construction techniques (see article "BMW creating new highs for carbon fiber") I believe they have taken a critical leap forward in future performance. The beautiful thing is that since it will become part of the core construction of vehicles, all will benefit. We could be only a generation away from a 500lb lighter 3 series. The strategy is a good one. The Corvette with antiquated engine technology gets very good mileage based on its light weight and tall final gear. Rumor is the next Corvette will debut direct injection (as well as other tech) in a smaller engine gaining higher efficiency and retaining high horsepower. But that is mostly possible because of the light weight of car. Imagine shaving 400-500lbs off of a vette with its current horsepower. It would gain in mileage and performance. With this large investment by BMW into light weight construction, BMW will likely be the leader in its segment for both performance and efficiency with smaller engines and minimal horsepower increases. As M3 fans, this news makes one wonder if it's timing with the soon to be released 3 series at the Frankfurt auto show is a coincidence or a teaser. Could the next 3 series be significantly lighter than the current version? At the very least I think we can count on a lighter M3. It's likely that much more than the roof and interior trim will be carbon fibre.
__________________
08 GT500 convertible red package (Black w/ Red stripes) /Ford Racing Exhaust /Cold Air Induction 560hp
10 Porsche Cayenne GTS Black w/ Black Wheels 408hp 11 M3 Silverstone w/ Silver Novillo Leather /Tech /Premium /19" /DCT /Ipod 414hp |
08-16-2011, 12:03 PM | #3 |
Major
213
Rep 1,395
Posts |
Interesting thread. I don't think the next gen will be lighter than the current, and the following gen won't be lighter than the E46, but you are right, the future will be about shedding pounds, and not about adding more power.
And yes, I would take a 414 HP M3 with less weight over the alternative you mentioned.
__________________
Club 6MT 2008 E92 M3 6MT, AW/Blk Ext., brushed aluminum 2006 E46 M3 ZCP 6MT Carbon blk/blk(sold) 2001 E46 325Xi 5MT Jet Blk/Blk (sold) |
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2011, 12:10 PM | #4 | |
Lieutenant
19
Rep 562
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Sedan SSII/SN/DCT
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, TX
|
Quote:
Accelleration would be the same (pounds per horsepower). The lighter weight would handle better, thus we would mostly choose less weight same horsepower.
__________________
08 GT500 convertible red package (Black w/ Red stripes) /Ford Racing Exhaust /Cold Air Induction 560hp
10 Porsche Cayenne GTS Black w/ Black Wheels 408hp 11 M3 Silverstone w/ Silver Novillo Leather /Tech /Premium /19" /DCT /Ipod 414hp |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2011, 12:16 PM | #5 |
smiling amid the chaos...
27
Rep 409
Posts |
Good thread.
I'll take more power and less weight thank-you very much. It's very interesting to see where technology is taking us in composite materials and their applications related to performance. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2011, 12:33 PM | #7 |
Second Lieutenant
3
Rep 256
Posts |
i won't hold me breath on this one. bmw isn't exactly known for making new models lighter than the previous even with all the new lightweight tech they have. the cars keep getting bigger and bigger.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2011, 12:37 PM | #8 |
Happy Camper
612
Rep 7,869
Posts
Drives: C63 AMG & 280 SL on Weekends :
Join Date: May 2010
Location: GTA, Ontario - Canada
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 1969 Restored Merce ... [7.50]
2011 M3 Coupe TRADED [7.34] 1987 BMW 535is [1.00] Cars from the Past [6.50] The ///M3 Engine S65 [9.59] |
Interesting thread indeed ... history is so fascinating. If we think about it how fortunate we are to drive the kind of car we are driving today with the changes in technology over the past 50 years ... and where it all began ...
Like .... BMW .... Here Like .... Mercedes .... Here Yes as the Chinese say ... May you live in "Interesting Times" and we sure are
__________________
Cheers, Rolf-Dieter
Life will take us to some interesting places, fortunately The ///M3 will too with a many of us know this very well, now my C6.3 AMG with 487 HP does it too ---> Click here for some good stuff I found |
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2011, 12:42 PM | #9 | |
Lieutenant
19
Rep 562
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Sedan SSII/SN/DCT
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, TX
|
Quote:
You bring up a good point though. How long before the government, who's demands already account for significant weight in cars, adds even more requirements that weigh down cars. We may just see cars maintain their weight instead of lose weight as these materials are introduced.
__________________
08 GT500 convertible red package (Black w/ Red stripes) /Ford Racing Exhaust /Cold Air Induction 560hp
10 Porsche Cayenne GTS Black w/ Black Wheels 408hp 11 M3 Silverstone w/ Silver Novillo Leather /Tech /Premium /19" /DCT /Ipod 414hp |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2011, 12:45 PM | #10 |
Captain
116
Rep 880
Posts |
This definitely makes sense. Definitely puts things in perspective about how high horsepower numbers are going to reach considering the high numbers some cars are coming with already.
-Vin |
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2011, 12:54 PM | #11 |
Moderator
7509
Rep 19,370
Posts |
At the rate things are progressing, a good deal of the CFRP savings will be offset by batteries and other equipment associated with the slow but sure transition from combustion engines to electric motors. i3 and i8 will bear this out.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2011, 01:09 PM | #12 | |
Lieutenant
19
Rep 562
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Sedan SSII/SN/DCT
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, TX
|
Quote:
His point was that an electric vehicle will never be as efficient as a gasoline vehicle in true terms of efficiency. He said efficiency is the wrong word to use. It is material savings meaning, saving gas. Electric cars save gasoline, but they are not more efficient. In fact they are far less efficient and far less flexible to be efficient. Hybrids on the other hand are a better option for real efficiency. Storage (and weight) can be limited because regneration of electric BTU's can be siphoned from the BTUs produced by the gas engine. Funny though he comments that the gas engine in a hybrid can not only propel the car, but also recharge the electric drive. Jokingly saying you need a gas engine for an electric car to make an electric powertrain efficient.
__________________
08 GT500 convertible red package (Black w/ Red stripes) /Ford Racing Exhaust /Cold Air Induction 560hp
10 Porsche Cayenne GTS Black w/ Black Wheels 408hp 11 M3 Silverstone w/ Silver Novillo Leather /Tech /Premium /19" /DCT /Ipod 414hp Last edited by Scoobe; 08-16-2011 at 02:21 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2011, 01:23 PM | #13 | |
Brigadier General
199
Rep 4,318
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
GT3 RS | Desperately seeking the next great M car...
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2011, 01:39 PM | #15 |
Major
119
Rep 1,497
Posts |
In this day and age where increasing regulation means more speed cameras/traps and speed limits. Is more power really the answer to having a blast in our cars?
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2011, 02:23 PM | #16 | |
Lieutenant
19
Rep 562
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Sedan SSII/SN/DCT
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, TX
|
Quote:
__________________
08 GT500 convertible red package (Black w/ Red stripes) /Ford Racing Exhaust /Cold Air Induction 560hp
10 Porsche Cayenne GTS Black w/ Black Wheels 408hp 11 M3 Silverstone w/ Silver Novillo Leather /Tech /Premium /19" /DCT /Ipod 414hp |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2011, 03:11 PM | #17 |
Lieutenant General
1311
Rep 10,185
Posts |
Some may be interested to know the USA is highly involved with making BMW's Carbon Fiber.
The raw chemical fibers are sourced from Japan They are then "cooked" into carbon fibers in Moses lake USA Then they are sent so Germany where they are "weaved" into fabric Finally the fabric goes to BMW Landshut that makes the parts
__________________
BMW if you are reading, I need a job, Please. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2011, 03:24 PM | #18 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
99
Rep 1,575
Posts |
Quote:
BMW condemned Audi for using Turbos... they now depend on turbos. BMW condemned Benz for putting the same engine in lot of performance cars... we will soon see BMW do the same. Maybe not exact engines but variations. BMW M believed and preached in all-natural, high-revving engines in M cars... 80% of current M cars on the market are twin turbos with average redlines. When the F3X M3 comes out, 100% of M cars will be forced induction. BMW never believed in front wheel drive vehicles... BMWi will be manufacturing front wheel drive vehicles. BMW preached hydrogen technology while everyone was working out hybrids/electrics... now BMWi will make hybrid/electric vehicles instead of hydrogen which they wasted years on developing. They have reason for doing everything they have done, but it does blur the lines of what we know about BMW and M. If there is anything you can depend on, it is that you can not rely on BMWs tradition or past trends to predict anything they will do. Shaving weight off of future vehicles is no different. Just because the weight has done nothing but go up, does not mean it will always do so and not reverse and start going down. I dont know this for sure of course, but I do know we can not rely on BMWs past or traditions to determine the direction of the current BMW. So if something seems logical, with enough supported evidence, I will believe in that before I believe in tradition, past values, and past trends.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2011, 03:47 PM | #19 | |
First Lieutenant
14
Rep 397
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
09 E92 M3, Space Grey, Fox Red, DCT - Current
05 E46 M3 - Gone 02 330ci - Gone 99 Lexus GS400 - Gone |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2011, 04:09 PM | #20 | |
Second Lieutenant
3
Rep 256
Posts |
Quote:
i guess it's feasible for me to say that once the 3 series gets to 4000lbs it might be able to sustain that weight for the next model, maybe even drop some of it (would you be excited if they drop 50lbs from a 4000lbs car?). however, i do believe that there is a "weight ceiling" and, unfortunately, i don't think we've hit it yet. i guess i'm jaded a bit by my E36 M3 with its stock weight of 3175lbs. i would be willing to place a decent wager on the fact that bmw will never make an M3 that weighs so little again. if for nothing else consider that their primary market is more interested in luxury and tech gimics. the fact that bmw felt it couldn't sell the CSL, GTS, etc. in america (their biggest market) is pretty telling on what is preferred and, at the end of the day, bmw is in the business of making money. here's a perfect example of what i was talking about.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2011, 04:23 PM | #21 | |
Private First Class
22
Rep 197
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|