|
|
|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
01-15-2012, 01:20 PM | #221 | |
Major
482
Rep 1,189
Posts |
Quote:
Already, Audi has an R8 with two (or even 3 engine options if you count the TDI v12 show car) engines. And a rumored R4, and where is BMW's answer? Already, Mercedes has established 2 AMG versions of the S Class, a CL class and it's AMG versions, a SL and it's AMG versions, and and SLS (which M Division wish that they could build their own special car). And where is BMW's answer? I mean the SL is probably more iconic than the 3 series, and has the genes to prove it... Hopefully, BMW is taking a page out of Porsche's book, and you'll see the fruits of this strategy. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-15-2012, 05:03 PM | #222 | |||
Enlisted Member
7
Rep 37
Posts |
Quote:
1) BMW never acknowledged that M is loosing its edge. So why fix something that is not acknowledged. 2) The M Gmbh is a small division. The resources are spread out to focus on a lot more projects. M used to focus on a handful of cars and even less engines. Look at them now, they are everywhere. Talk about resource dilution which inherently brings less focus and less solid products. 3) The M cars (especially the M3) have always proved themselves on the track, in GT series. Name a series that BMW fully committed the e9x to. BMW in the past years has shown no interest in keeping M Gmbh as a race oriented group that would build 2-3 terrifying machines. Quote:
Porsche decided to build other models to allow them to survive. I was among the nay sayers when the Panamera and Cayenne came to light. However, they showed their true intentions when the 911 (997 and 991) turned out to be true to the pedigree and shut all of us up. As much as the Cayman has great potential to be better than the 911, Porsche will never take it to that level. This is what I call sticking to your heritage and taking a loss just to preserve your hard core followers. So why can't BMW build 1, 3, 5, x series for the masses and give M to the fanatics? They are big enough to afford this plan. Quote:
.Mdrei |
|||
Appreciate
0
|
01-15-2012, 11:07 PM | #223 |
Anti-Fanboy
68
Rep 572
Posts |
Time will tell all. It's impossible to "whore" out something that most of the american population cannot afford. There's nothing wrong with BMW using M to increase profits; that's what they're supposed to do. We'll see what the next-generation M cars will bring.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2012, 09:31 AM | #224 | |
Private First Class
36
Rep 199
Posts |
Quote:
I bought my M3 in Germany and I can remember how proud they were in regards to their M lineup. They kept on saying how these M cars were so different and special from their regular lineup. I guess that was just a bunch of nonsense. They could easily have created a different performance package for the regular lineup instead of ruining the M brand. The good thing is that we do have choice on what to buy next time.
__________________
2022 BMW X6M Competition Alpine White/Black Leather |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2012, 10:24 AM | #225 |
Major General
5385
Rep 5,824
Posts |
Think of BMW M Performance Automobiles giving the M cars equipment and technology they refuse to on the current M cars.
Four Wheel Drive on an M3 and M5 Please? No....That is why the X-M's exist. Diesel Power? Would work in Europe but not commercially viable in other parts of the world. If you take the X6 M50d and the BMW M550dxDrive what you have is individuality , A performance car with many talents , All wheel drive , Performance and thanks to the diesel - efficiency. These are euro-centric cars aimed at customers who would like an M but when all factors are considered it can be out of their reach and not financially viable. The M550dxDrive will also be available as a Touring , as M are not yet to commit to an M5 Touring even though there is enthusiasm for such a model. Given the state of the European market and their diesel priority , it is though that between the Sedan and Touring. The Touring is expected to be the better seller which BMW will judge to see if there is further demand for an M Touring.
__________________
The M850i is evidence that BMW have got their mojo back when it comes to dynamic sports cars...
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2012, 10:55 AM | #226 |
Lieutenant General
4987
Rep 10,212
Posts
Drives: 2024 Golf R / 718 SRS (on way)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
|
[QUOTE=SCOTT26;11158856]Think of BMW M Performance Automobiles giving the M cars equipment and technology they refuse to on the current M cars.
QUOTE] I think I know what you're saying--the point of the new M performance line is to allow certain technologies exclusive to ///M to show up in a non M car. But I have to ask...isn't that kind of the point of having the M series? To keep certain things exclusive to ///M, which is supposed to represent the craziest and maddest BMWs? What is the reasoning of having the ///M brand if it isn't easily distinguishable, from a performance standard, than the other "regular" models in the lineup? You've just made the point being echoed here by so many on the board. By pushing that technology downstream, you are in effect diluting the ///M brand.
__________________
Past rides: 2022 718 Spyder, 2022 MINI JCW, 2016 981 BGTS, 2020 MINI JCW, 2017 F80, 2015 981 CS, 2014 F22 235, 2011 E82 135, 2008 E82 135, 2007 E92 328, 2007 E92 328 (My lady drives an OG M2. So does my dad)
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2012, 11:08 AM | #227 | |
Colonel
146
Rep 2,311
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2012, 11:09 AM | #228 | |
Anti-Fanboy
68
Rep 572
Posts |
[QUOTE=dmboone25;11159031]
Quote:
It isn't the technology that separates M cars from the rest, but rather the driving experience, right? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2012, 11:11 AM | #229 |
Anti-Fanboy
68
Rep 572
Posts |
Why is everyone saying that there will "M" badges on every car? 335iM will most likely not have the iconic "M" emblem like the M3/M5/etc. I don't think anyone is going to confuse the two.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2012, 01:23 PM | #230 | |
Enlisted Member
7
Rep 37
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2012, 01:54 PM | #231 | |
Private First Class
70
Rep 125
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2019 X7
2016 G11 2009 E60 M5 2008 E90 M3 - Gone |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2012, 02:02 PM | #232 | |
Private First Class
70
Rep 125
Posts |
Quote:
Truthfully, im disappointed but I'll buy a diesel AWD 550Mxd (my preferred designation) if you bring it to the states simply because I think the new Ms are going too be soft anyways. Why pay the premium for HP and torque you can't use if you can't even feel or hear it.
__________________
2019 X7
2016 G11 2009 E60 M5 2008 E90 M3 - Gone |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2012, 02:38 PM | #233 |
Major
1890
Rep 1,231
Posts |
To all those who say that anything that's not a REAL ///M shouldn't get the ///M badge: if you were to purchase a day-to-day F30 aside from your ///M3, would you deliberately not choose the new optional ///M brakes or the nice and thick rimmed ///M wheel JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE BADGED ///M?
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2012, 02:41 PM | #234 | |
Moderator
7538
Rep 19,368
Posts |
Quote:
M-badged parts and the MSport package have obviously been available for a long time now. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2012, 02:46 PM | #235 | ||
Moderator
7538
Rep 19,368
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2012, 03:23 PM | #236 | |
Lieutenant General
4987
Rep 10,212
Posts
Drives: 2024 Golf R / 718 SRS (on way)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
|
[QUOTE=Bunkei;11159097]
Quote:
You are more accurate in your response by mentioning the superior driver's feel of a proper ///M car--and I completely agree with that statement. For instance, my 2008 135, with JB4 and other bolt ons was very fast in a straight line. But it was no comparison to the feeling that driving my dad's Z4MC provided. The Z4MC was more engaging, more of a thrill, better in every bend, and significantly more special. My overall point is that whatever seperates M cars from regular BMWs should stay in the Ms. Whether that's technology based, engine based, lightness, whatever. If 40% or 50% or whatever % of that M specific feel or technology is what BMW determines what this BS M performance model should contain, I think overall that it is a dilution of the brand.
__________________
Past rides: 2022 718 Spyder, 2022 MINI JCW, 2016 981 BGTS, 2020 MINI JCW, 2017 F80, 2015 981 CS, 2014 F22 235, 2011 E82 135, 2008 E82 135, 2007 E92 328, 2007 E92 328 (My lady drives an OG M2. So does my dad)
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2012, 03:48 PM | #237 | |
Private First Class
36
Rep 199
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2022 BMW X6M Competition Alpine White/Black Leather |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2012, 04:26 PM | #238 | |||
Private First Class
70
Rep 125
Posts |
Quote:
This can be done without utilizing the Motorsport colors and merely using the letter M.
__________________
2019 X7
2016 G11 2009 E60 M5 2008 E90 M3 - Gone |
|||
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2012, 08:49 PM | #239 |
Anti-Fanboy
68
Rep 572
Posts |
Really? Interesting, but diesel does make sense in an SUV that heavy. I still think it's unlikely that they will be using the "M" insignia on the M Performance cars, but we'll see.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-17-2012, 04:23 AM | #240 | ||
Major
1890
Rep 1,231
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
If this is the actual issue (preserving M's quality and heritage), then the same reasoning should apply to M badged sporty options & accessoires (brakes, steering wheels, seats, door sills...) which shouldn't be available on regular vehicles because they are...regular vehicles and because their quality and aspect do not always match those coming from a real M car (the M Sport's steering wheel doesn't exactly look like the M3 wheel, the M sport rims are not as light, the new M brakes available on the F30 are certainly not as strong...). But if offering diverse M equipment on basic vehicles is acceptable, then putting an M logo on the trunk lid of a vehicle which, though not a real M, has been developped by M and tweaked to offer significantly higher driving qualities, is also acceptable. If these discontent people are separating these 2 issues, on the one hand accepting that an M Sport 318d (purely image product) is named so and gets plenty of M badges in the cabin, on the rims...just not on the trunk lid, and on the other hand disapproving an M badge on the trunk lid of an M Performance M335i (though closer to a real M vehicle than an M Sport 318d), then I argue that these pretentions are not based on "preserving M's quality, heritage and image" but simply on preserving their own image and ego of sporting the M logo exclusively on their own trunk lid. It is all right to want to avoid triviality and stand out when you buy the 'real deal' (even more so when you pay a big cheque), but if this is the main issue, we shouldn't be talking about heritage and tradition but merely about the right to an upmarket image earned by putting in the required cost. If however heritage is the main issue, then be consistent and disapprove every item that's badged M aside from real M hardcore vehicles and which hurt M's quality and tradition, at least as much as you disapprove your own vehicle's image being diluted by lower range vehicles wearing the M badge on their back, as performant as they might be. And naturally, don't drive a 1M or an M3 because M has long ago 'sold out' on basic 116i or 320d M Sport. It should be clear though that BMW Motorsport is not a confidential racing team but a globally growing sub-brand which logically offers a whole bunch of products and accessories: hence hardcore M vehicles in first place, but also M Sport image vehicles, M accessories available even on non-M Sport vehicles (wheel...), and all the more, a range of M Performance products which without being hardcore M vehicles have a decent edge over regular models, are actually developped with M's engineering expertise and thus legitimately deserve a name and therefore a badge in association with M. Last edited by advantage20; 01-17-2012 at 08:11 AM.. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
01-17-2012, 08:44 AM | #241 | |
Moderator
7538
Rep 19,368
Posts |
Quote:
As far as I can tell, though, a far greater number of people who are taking issue with the new line of M Performance vehicles are very much aware of these already existing M products. Their argument is that the new lineup and naming scheme is taking it one step too far. Is it hair splitting? I suppose one could argue that. I honestly am pretty neutral on the whole issue myself. But the fact remains that this is a new strategy for BMW and M, and I can see some substance to both sides of the debate. If I have any issue, it would not be with the marketing side, but rather a question of keeping the brand values alive and the actual viability for traditional M vehicles as we know them as things go forward. I am the first to acknowledge that there has been a systematic "softening" of the M brand (if you will) over the decades. Every new model is more accessible than that before it. But, what I don't want to see is a complete break from the philosophy of offering the hardest-core model that can be built profitably. The reall concern is, if in the future everyone buys this new M440i (say) instead of an M4, then how long can we expect them to even build an M4? Not long. Instead, maybe eventually what they would have marketed as a 435i (say) just gets renamed to M440i, and what would have been called the M440i is now an M4. So where is the M4? It is either gone, or maybe its now a very low production vehicle like an M4 GTS. I am not saying it will happen, I am just saying its yet another concern to put on the pile of concerns about the brand that has been stacking up recently (M SUVs when they said they'd never build them, forced induction when they said they would stay N/A, Ms with mildly tuned engines from series vehicles, etc, etc). |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-17-2012, 04:49 PM | #242 |
The Legend
8
Rep 35
Posts
Drives: 2008 E92 328i Sport
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: LA
|
If what I've been reading on this thread is true, then this will go one of two ways.
1. They will put the ///M badge along with the series name in a way indistinguishable from the real M's and confuse the average consumer, further diluting the brand. 2. They will put the ///M badge, but it will not be in true M fashion. As in, the badge location, size, placement, etc. will be different enough that both average people and enthusiasts will both know the distinction. Depending on how this is going to play out, I think this is beneficial for BMW to bring in some more sales to focus on their true M division. There are a lot of people out there who want M-like performance without the price tag. Maybe they just want SOME of the soul, since they aren't the type to fully track their cars all the time anyway. I think it fills a great in-between segment that the "-is" was trying to awkwardly fill. I think some people taking issue with this new range are the ones that are insecure that their true M's will be confused with "mass M's". If you can spread motorsport heritage a little more to the masses, then why not? The "true M" owners and enthusiasts (all of us) are the ones that know the real M's anyway. Are the real M owners scared that this new category will actually be a lot of bang for the buck? Just a thought. I don't think BMW is abandoning their heritage, as I've seen some mention already. They have produced some fantastic cars, but maybe they haven't performed as well as their ancestors, relative to their time. The M3 being used for RLL racing is doing well, no? I honestly don't think BMW would abandon and dilute the M brand just to make a buck. I think they know that the exclusivity and heritage of the brand is what really powers BMW because ///M is the soul. I don't even have an M3, but I am really happy with my 328i because I know that it's granddaddy is the M3. If there was no M division, I don't think I would've considered BMW when buying a car. They really need to shorten their designations though. "335is" was already too many numbers and letters IMO. Can you imagine "M108374XDSASD AWD"? Last edited by thedm; 01-17-2012 at 05:00 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|