BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Engine, Transmission, Exhaust, Drivetrain, ECU Software Modifications
 
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      12-07-2013, 02:19 PM   #23
DLSJ5
Brigadier General
DLSJ5's Avatar
United_States
501
Rep
4,033
Posts

Drives: 2016 F82 M4 ZCP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malek@MRF View Post
I agree. The manifold should utilize better clamps to prevent the lifting. Either a support bracket at the rear of the manifold, or weld on v-band flanges onto the factory throttle inlets and v-band flanges on the ESS manifold velocity stacks and secure them this way. It is a leak free and service free solution.
What clamps do you think would work? Did I not say I tried different clamps? Conventional wisdom would say one BOV would work I agree, but that's not the case here, AA and Evolve use more than one with less boost, and there's probably a reason for it don't you think? I'm running much more boost, one of the things I noticed at times when the manifold would lift, it would occur right after a shift or when I let off, indicating pressure was not releasing fast enough, this was only happening on high speed runs at the airstrip. Did you not recommend a second BOV at the first event, where you were helping me put the manifold back on? You could weld the manifold all you want, change the velocity stacks, clamps, etc. it might not lift, but something else will give way because of the pressure, this much boost on this particular car, setup, psi level, needs additional valves or possibly one big one, and again the ICV needs to see less pressure, so you'll need two in that case, but what do I know.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malek@MRF View Post
Congrats Drew. Glad she's running well. However, why is the 2nd bypass valve being plumbed back into the charged section of the intake? Why not just plumb back into the pre-charged intake tract along with the main Bypass valve.
Thanks, but do you really think I would route a bypass valve that way? The rear Forge bypass valve in the rear is plumed back into the intake pre supercharger just like the ESS vortech valve, the 2nd Forge bypass valve is open to air, but has a hose that is routed to the front and is open, the hose was added to kill the noise.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malek@MRF View Post
And Drew, the differential bushings in your car are on their way out. There is a lot of deflection occurring there last time I saw it. The car is making double the WHP of the stock M3. Certain drive train components are simply not going to last or do their job correctly.
I remember you saying all the bushings were fine on the car when you inspected it. Another BMW tech confirmed they were fine as well, but I agree it might be a good idea to upgrade those.
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ
ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ
Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH
Appreciate 0
      12-07-2013, 02:33 PM   #24
tom @ eas
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
tom @ eas's Avatar
United_States
8131
Rep
18,816
Posts


Drives: BMW
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Anaheim, CA

iTrader: (19)

Garage List
2018 BMW i3s  [0.00]
2010 BMW M3  [6.50]
2015 BMW M4  [5.25]
Appreciate the mention, glad to be a part of this build.

With new rubber and clamps (5+ year old clamps under various builds), the manifold shouldn't be lifting anymore. There's still lots of room of improvement for the next airstrip event, but everything is going in the right direction.

Not to mention sounding much more quieter on the street. Sleeper is the way to go.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DLSJ5 View Post
I remember you saying all the bushings were fine on the car when you inspected it. Another BMW tech confirmed they were fine as well, but I agree it might be a good idea to upgrade those.
Don't worry, we already have bushings covered. Wait until you see what we have in store for the track build we're doing.
__________________
Tom G. | european auto source (eas)
email: tom@europeanautosource.com · web: https://europeanautosource.com· tel 866.669.0705 · ca: 714.369.8524 x22

GET DAILY UPDATES ON OUR BLOG · FACEBOOK · YOUTUBE · FLICKR · INSTAGRAM
Appreciate 0
      12-07-2013, 02:43 PM   #25
SYZ
Lieutenant
SYZ's Avatar
34
Rep
454
Posts

Drives: :O
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Scottsdale

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malek@MRF View Post



Congrats Drew. Glad she's running well. However, why is the 2nd bypass valve being plumbed back into the charged section of the intake? Why not just plumb back into the pre-charged intake tract along with the main Bypass valve.
It looks like it does? I think it's going from the charged coupling to the non charged intake. But the valve does look backwards.
Appreciate 0
      12-07-2013, 02:48 PM   #26
SYZ
Lieutenant
SYZ's Avatar
34
Rep
454
Posts

Drives: :O
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Scottsdale

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLSJ5 View Post
one of the things I noticed at times when the manifold would lift, it would occur right after a shift or when I let off, indicating pressure was not releasing fast enough, this was only happening on high speed runs at the airstrip.

Hey Drew, did you notice anything else that the car would do differently when lifting off the throttle fast? Like the RPMs not coming down quickly enough?
Appreciate 0
      12-07-2013, 02:50 PM   #27
OM VT3
Lieutenant Colonel
OM VT3's Avatar
140
Rep
1,665
Posts

Drives: 2011 e92 zcp m3
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Somewhere

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DLSJ5 View Post
Using the Autologic they re-calibrated the DCT clutches.
Is that like a dct tune?
Appreciate 0
      12-07-2013, 02:50 PM   #28
DLSJ5
Brigadier General
DLSJ5's Avatar
United_States
501
Rep
4,033
Posts

Drives: 2016 F82 M4 ZCP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SYZ View Post
It looks like it does? I think it's going from the charged coupling to the non charged intake. But the valve does look backwards.
That's correct, but instead of recirculating back to the intake pre SC, it just vents to air, via a hose routed to the front, to eliminate the noise and actually you can install a Forge/Bosch type bypass valve in either direction and it will work fine, the one I installed in the rear is backwards, but it works perfectly fine, the one in front is installed in the right direction though.

__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ
ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ
Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH

Last edited by DLSJ5; 12-07-2013 at 04:13 PM..
Appreciate 0
      12-07-2013, 02:52 PM   #29
DLSJ5
Brigadier General
DLSJ5's Avatar
United_States
501
Rep
4,033
Posts

Drives: 2016 F82 M4 ZCP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by leigh View Post
Is that like a dct tune?
No, when new clutches or a new transmission is installed BMW or whoever has the proper equipment, needs to do a recalibration of the clutch engagement. I had a used transmission installed a few years back after my original one failed with the SSP clutches, at the time the dealer didn't even know how to do the recalibration, regardless it seems to have rectified the issue quite a bit.
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ
ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ
Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH
Appreciate 0
      12-07-2013, 02:54 PM   #30
DLSJ5
Brigadier General
DLSJ5's Avatar
United_States
501
Rep
4,033
Posts

Drives: 2016 F82 M4 ZCP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SYZ View Post
Hey Drew, did you notice anything else that the car would do differently when lifting off the throttle fast? Like the RPMs not coming down quickly enough?
Yes, but only on high speed runs, this was do to the pressure not being able to escape fast enough with 11+psi, it doesn't do it anymore now with the additional bypass valves.
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ
ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ
Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH
Appreciate 0
      12-07-2013, 03:04 PM   #31
OM VT3
Lieutenant Colonel
OM VT3's Avatar
140
Rep
1,665
Posts

Drives: 2011 e92 zcp m3
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Somewhere

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DLSJ5 View Post
No, when new clutches or a new transmission is installed BMW or whoever has the proper equipment, needs to do a recalibration of the clutch engagement. I had a used transmission installed a few years back after my original one failed with the SSP clutches, at the time the dealer didn't even know how to do the recalibration, regardless it seems to have rectified the issue quite a bit.
Mine seems like it's starting to get slow do you think a dct tune will help it?
Appreciate 0
      12-07-2013, 03:08 PM   #32
DLSJ5
Brigadier General
DLSJ5's Avatar
United_States
501
Rep
4,033
Posts

Drives: 2016 F82 M4 ZCP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by leigh View Post
Mine seems like it's starting to get slow do you think a dct tune will help it?
It's hard to increase the speed of the DCT it shifts so fast, I'd have to drive in your car to see, does it feel slower than other DCT's you've been in?
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ
ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ
Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH
Appreciate 0
      12-07-2013, 03:32 PM   #33
DLSJ5
Brigadier General
DLSJ5's Avatar
United_States
501
Rep
4,033
Posts

Drives: 2016 F82 M4 ZCP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M-powerMode View Post
Awesome journey and write up man!

Raising the power bar is not an
easy task, it takes patience and support to achieve and it seems like you have a good group of friends and support from the ESS guy's!
Look forward to your progress & keep us posted !
Appreciate the kind words! I've had a lot of support from ESS, a lot of other shops and people too, been very lucky!
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ
ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ
Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH
Appreciate 0
      12-07-2013, 03:33 PM   #34
DLSJ5
Brigadier General
DLSJ5's Avatar
United_States
501
Rep
4,033
Posts

Drives: 2016 F82 M4 ZCP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by tom @ eas View Post
Appreciate the mention, glad to be a part of this build.

With new rubber and clamps (5+ year old clamps under various builds), the manifold shouldn't be lifting anymore. There's still lots of room of improvement for the next airstrip event, but everything is going in the right direction.

Not to mention sounding much more quieter on the street. Sleeper is the way to go.



Don't worry, we already have bushings covered. Wait until you see what we have in store for the track build we're doing.
Appreciate all your help/support Tom, I'm loving the quieter exhaust/with the tips as well.
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ
ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ
Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH
Appreciate 0
      12-07-2013, 03:47 PM   #35
TheKosherStogie
Lieutenant Colonel
TheKosherStogie's Avatar
United_States
342
Rep
1,805
Posts

Drives: 08 M3 DCT AW/Red
Join Date: May 2009
Location: West Hollywood

iTrader: (1)

Glad all is well drew!
Appreciate 0
      12-07-2013, 03:49 PM   #36
DLSJ5
Brigadier General
DLSJ5's Avatar
United_States
501
Rep
4,033
Posts

Drives: 2016 F82 M4 ZCP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DD GT3 RD View Post
Glad all is well drew!
Russo! Thanks Brother.
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ
ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ
Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH
Appreciate 0
      12-07-2013, 03:53 PM   #37
OM VT3
Lieutenant Colonel
OM VT3's Avatar
140
Rep
1,665
Posts

Drives: 2011 e92 zcp m3
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Somewhere

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DLSJ5 View Post
It's hard to increase the speed of the DCT it shifts so fast, I'd have to drive in your car to see, does it feel slower than other DCT's you've been in?
If feels slow when I compare it to how it was 12 months ago.....downshifts are no where near as good and up shifts don't bang in like they use to

I've been thinking about getting the GTS software and see how that goes
Appreciate 0
      12-07-2013, 03:58 PM   #38
JBiddy
Brigadier General
United_States
197
Rep
3,840
Posts

Drives: F82 ///M
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Northern/N.J

iTrader: (9)

Awesome man! Car is deff a beast!
__________________
///M
Appreciate 0
      12-07-2013, 04:14 PM   #39
DLSJ5
Brigadier General
DLSJ5's Avatar
United_States
501
Rep
4,033
Posts

Drives: 2016 F82 M4 ZCP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by leigh View Post
If feels slow when I compare it to how it was 12 months ago.....downshifts are no where near as good and up shifts don't bang in like they use to

I've been thinking about getting the GTS software and see how that goes
Might as well try the GTS.
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ
ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ
Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH
Appreciate 0
      12-07-2013, 04:29 PM   #40
JEllis
Major General
JEllis's Avatar
532
Rep
5,498
Posts

Drives: E36 M3, E92 M3
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DLSJ5 View Post
What motor?
PGs motor
__________________
http://www.m3post.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic14547_7.gif
Instagram: jellismotorwerks
Appreciate 0
      12-08-2013, 09:48 AM   #41
DLSJ5
Brigadier General
DLSJ5's Avatar
United_States
501
Rep
4,033
Posts

Drives: 2016 F82 M4 ZCP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by JEllis
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLSJ5 View Post
What motor?
PGs motor
Ah, his motor is fine, currently he's building a big power setup, much more elaborate than what I've done.
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ
ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ
Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH
Appreciate 0
      12-08-2013, 12:56 PM   #42
L4ces
Major
L4ces's Avatar
United_States
337
Rep
1,489
Posts

Drives: 2008 E92 M3 Alpine White
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NJ - NY

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 M3  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLSJ5
Quote:
Originally Posted by JEllis
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLSJ5 View Post
What motor?
PGs motor
Ah, his motor is fine, currently he's building a big power setup, much more elaborate than what I've done.
I thought the pinnacle for this motor was reached! But it sounds like NOT :-)
Appreciate 0
      12-08-2013, 01:35 PM   #43
dvpouldar26
Major
dvpouldar26's Avatar
64
Rep
1,498
Posts

Drives: 2008 e92 328i, Porsche 987.1
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Beverly Hills, CA

iTrader: (4)

Ever considered some headers? I know several threads have gone back and forth about this, but ACM recently showed gains on their FI car with the schmeidmann headers. I would think on a a higher boost setup like yours, that there could be gains there over the stock headers. Are the gains worth the money and the long install? That's subjective but the schmeidmann headers aren't too bad from a price point.
Appreciate 0
      12-08-2013, 01:56 PM   #44
OM VT3
Lieutenant Colonel
OM VT3's Avatar
140
Rep
1,665
Posts

Drives: 2011 e92 zcp m3
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Somewhere

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dvpouldar26 View Post
Ever considered some headers? I know several threads have gone back and forth about this, but ACM recently showed gains on their FI car with the schmeidmann headers. I would think on a a higher boost setup like yours, that there could be gains there over the stock headers. Are the gains worth the money and the long install? That's subjective but the schmeidmann headers aren't too bad from a price point.
If you took the motor out I'd say it's a must
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 PM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST