|
|
03-03-2013, 06:52 PM | #111 |
Brigadier General
127
Rep 4,144
Posts |
Obioban and xyd LI installations are very slick. Unfortunately, I don't think putting the heads in the headlight will work well with the E9x M3s. The headlights are harder to take out and much harder to get apart than the E46 headlights. Plus, when you look at their profile from the top they are angled too far and there doesn't seem to be much room left to get the heads pointed as straight down the road as they need to be. Still, I wish someone would try this and prove me wrong. I'm not brave enough to be the guinea pig.
And to answer a previous question: yes, I take the V1 down when I park. Most of the time. (I am a bit lazy when it comes down to it.) It is a pain sometimes to get back in and make sure it's level but it keeps thieves away and doesn't let the V1 get too hot in the sun. I place it under the passenger seat, and don't use a box. If I forget to put it back up it slides forward when I brake reminding me. Cheers.
__________________
2017 F80 YMB.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-03-2013, 07:41 PM | #112 |
Captain
294
Rep 708
Posts |
+1 The larger the angle, the slower the reported speed (because radar is measuring the closing speed of the vehicles). Side-by-side at 90 degrees, it should show a speed of zero.
Cheers
__________________
Bye bye E93 M3 - Hello F83 M4! Last edited by M4Now!; 03-03-2013 at 07:48 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-04-2013, 12:58 PM | #113 |
Captain
56
Rep 868
Posts
Drives: 2011 E90 M3, Jerez Black
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SF Bay
|
The Valentine one has a rudimentary version of this. The issue is that the doppler shift isn't accurate enough to pinpoint the signal when it is bouncing of multiple objects like buildings/SUVs/mountains, etc.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-04-2013, 01:02 PM | #114 | |
Captain
56
Rep 868
Posts
Drives: 2011 E90 M3, Jerez Black
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SF Bay
|
Quote:
If you are the first car to be hit by instant on, you are only warned that you just received a ticket. However, the cop may have hit the guy a half mile ahead of you, so it's always imporant to keep situational awareness with a radar detector. That momentary warning may not have been a random glitch/door opener, etc. It may have been instant on ahead that is now lying in wait for you. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-28-2013, 08:33 PM | #117 |
Id rather be boating...
68
Rep 1,097
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-01-2013, 12:54 PM | #118 |
Private
1
Rep 93
Posts |
Laser veil anti laser coating seems to do a great job of fending off laser. Better than nothing for sure! Jammers are illegal here in CA so veil is the best laser protection I can get, and its under $100!
As for detectors my Valentine 1 blows everything else out of the water. Say what you will about other detectors having greater range but the arrows make the information it provides so much more usable. Ex: If it goes off I quickly slow down and set cruise to 76-77mph (gps clocked speed) and watch signal strength and arrows on the V1 to see where the LEO likely is. More often than not signal strength ramps up with forward arrow lit then it switches to the rear arrow and signal declines. Indicating he passed going the other way. The whole encounter usually lasts less than 20 seconds from initial alert to LEO passing me. When he passes signal will often drop off quickly, indicating he has his forward facing radar on and i immediately return to cruising speed even tho the V1 is still flashing with a low level signal strength! This is the value of the V1, since the arrows allow me to deduce he has passed going the other way I can immediately speed up instead of having to wait for the alert to finally go away. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-01-2013, 02:18 PM | #119 |
Banned
15
Rep 408
Posts |
it has been tested once (95 in a 65 and shot) and passed with flying colors. im sitting on an 11 pointer thats currently being delayed. can't afford to have another ticket.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-01-2013, 03:27 PM | #120 |
Captain
103
Rep 728
Posts |
v1 there is no substitute!
I own 2 V1'S and they have both saved me and my wife many many times.
__________________
Compensating a heavy car with horsepower is like giving an alcoholic cocaine to sober him up...
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-01-2013, 07:53 PM | #121 |
Id rather be boating...
68
Rep 1,097
Posts |
Thats awesome! Good luck with that. I had a 12 pointer in one stop from a prick state boy in 2007!
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-01-2013, 08:00 PM | #122 |
E90 6MT MASTER
74
Rep 314
Posts |
Valentine is the best hands down...laser is laser nothing out there will save you accept the k-40 but if you don't wanna hard wire and taint your electrical system your outa luck...m3+valentine = better license .... Once you master the V1 your brain will react faster and your instinct of common hideouts will be second nature .... Paired together you will be fine, just make sure you turn the volume back up after an important phone call, that's usually the only time I get pulled over ... The unplugged detecter mistake....
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-01-2013, 08:03 PM | #123 | |
Id rather be boating...
68
Rep 1,097
Posts |
Quote:
The k40 doesn't have a good reputation amongst other laser jammers. LED diode technology is where it's at regarding jammers. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2013, 04:43 AM | #124 |
Banned
15
Rep 408
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2013, 05:29 PM | #126 |
Private First Class
42
Rep 169
Posts |
Had v1 for 10+ years and this year changed to 9500ix. v1 has a better sensitivity but gps based filtering on 9500ix is the reason I decided to keep it over v1.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2013, 02:29 AM | #127 | |
Private
1
Rep 93
Posts |
Quote:
When you start applying any filter to your radar detector there is always a risk that that filter, no matter how sensitive, will filter out a radar source that is actually an LEO. The risk of this happening can be reduced by clever computer programming done by the technical wizards who build radar detectors for a living. Still occasionally even those advanced filters filter out a real radar threat. The first major flaw with the GPS filtering thing is when you start adding false positive locations to your detector basically what youre doing is telling it not to alert you at certain locations. So if one day youre driving past the local grocery store (K band door opener) and you have previously told the GPS to filter out an alert at that location then if there ever were to be a LEO running K band in that radius youd be had. The second flaw is if you tell your detector to ignore a lot of different "false positive" locations, then eventually you could imagine your local area would look like swiss cheese (kinda?), what I mean is if you plug in a whole bunch of false positive locations you're essentially gambling that there won't be an LEO with that radar band in any of those radii, ever. Thats not a gamble I'd want to take. Personally, filters of any kind are counter productive to the very reason I bought a radar detector in the first place- to give myself the best possible defense against tickets. The end. When you start adding filters or any kind, especially the GPS variety which are particularly bad, youre turning a very dependable device into something that you cant be sure will alert you. If you can't trust something to work 100% of the time it might as well be useless, just giving you a false sense of security. My suggestion is to not drive balls to the walls all the time, no need to risk it if you're not in a hurry. And when you are in a hurry take speeding very seriously. Remove all the electronic filters and get good at reading a detector's alerts and determining for yourself if you need to slow down. You will always be the best filter, you may not be as quick at determining a false positive but once you get good you'll be much more confident. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2013, 06:26 AM | #128 |
Emperor
1614
Rep 2,764
Posts |
It keeps track of the number or radar sources at a given location and the frequency of each. If there's and extra source or a frequency change, it pings you. If a former false positive goes away, it also automatically unlearns it. The chance if a false filtering is very very very very low-- cop would have to be on the same band at the same frequency as a closed store in the first three times you drove past the store since it closed.
The GPS filtering is an awesome system... Just not awesome enough for me to give up the V1's range and arrows. I'd gladly add it to the v1 if i could. As is, it's perfect for my fiancé who would ignore or turn off a v1. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2013, 10:06 AM | #129 | |
Captain
294
Rep 708
Posts |
Quote:
So, it's extremely effective in filtering out only the signals you don't care about. Cheers
__________________
Bye bye E93 M3 - Hello F83 M4! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2013, 10:16 AM | #130 | |
Colonel
341
Rep 2,940
Posts |
Quote:
Can a frequency that is not absolutely identical to police radar be picked up as a false positive? If yes, then the filtering is very beneficial, but if you are blocking out actual exact police radar frequencies, then that can be dangerous, no?
__________________
Audi S6 * Audi S3 * Porsche Cayman GTS
--Former BMW M3 owner |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2013, 10:18 AM | #131 | |
Captain
294
Rep 708
Posts |
Quote:
If the frequency is outside the known range for police band radars, presumably the detectors will ignore it completely (I don't know this to be true, just assuming). Cheers
__________________
Bye bye E93 M3 - Hello F83 M4! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2013, 05:56 PM | #132 |
Brigadier General
387
Rep 3,932
Posts |
I have one (passport), but stopped using it once i got my M3. I hate the way it looks just siting there. I mean when i was 16 i can see how it would be cool. I have leather and wood trim having that LED plastic gadget is a trashy touch IMO. You can get them built into your cluster.
Although IMO they work in a way that you know when police are around, but that goes both ways if you know what i mean. They can save you at times! but most of the time its more of a awareness thing. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|