|
|
06-20-2008, 07:23 AM | #45 | |
Major General
382
Rep 8,033
Posts |
Quote:
I looked through your posts, and can't pin down which thought experiment you are referring to exactly? Are you referring to BMW swapping spring during testing? If so, yes, they must have surely done that. However, once they nailed down what they wanted, they could have optimized things further for that stiffness.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-20-2008, 12:55 PM | #46 | ||
Lieutenant General
634
Rep 10,407
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
06-20-2008, 04:45 PM | #47 |
Lieutenant General
634
Rep 10,407
Posts |
Here is our first guinea pig. EDC = sport at least "feels" better with aftermarket springs. This is not going to be an issue.
http://www.m3post.com/forums/showpos...98&postcount=7 |
Appreciate
0
|
06-20-2008, 06:49 PM | #48 | |
Major General
382
Rep 8,033
Posts |
Quote:
Plus, how much extra offset do you really think you will get on this car with 500lbs delta load--even 0.25"? People are talking about dropping these cars 1.5"-2.0".
__________________
Last edited by lucid; 06-20-2008 at 08:10 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-20-2008, 06:55 PM | #49 | |
Major General
382
Rep 8,033
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-21-2008, 01:40 AM | #50 | |
Lieutenant General
634
Rep 10,407
Posts |
Quote:
On ride height: I suspect max permissible load to drop the car pretty close to the same amount as a "sport" drop. Again only trying to find common ground that we agree that the EDC system is not able to discern ride height offsets and this does not affect the robustness of it. The lowering accomplished by the weight will help the car and handling by lowering its CG and improving its frontal area but will hurt it by the extra moment of inertia and higher centifugal forces. It won't hurt the handling by messing up EDC function. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-23-2008, 10:33 PM | #51 |
Private
15
Rep 72
Posts |
I'm pretty sure all this talk/disagreement boils down to the compromises that every engineer makes on every decision. Yes models work well. Are they 99.99% accurate? Of course not. Could you have a look-up table to reduce cost and complexity? Sure but would it work as well? You get the idea.
I'm pretty sure you guys are all preaching the same ideas, and that if you all sat in a room together with all the information you would reach a comprise...just as the BMW engineers did. Either way the thread has been a fun read after work. It's nice knowing there are other professionals roaming around on these forums.
__________________
2006 BMW M3 | SMG | Jet Black | Black Nappa Leather | Titan Shadow Trim | HK Prem Audio |
Appreciate
0
|
06-26-2008, 09:23 PM | #52 | |
Major General
382
Rep 8,033
Posts |
Quote:
Yes, every design decision is indeed essentially a trade-off between competing requirements...
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-26-2008, 09:29 PM | #53 | |
Major General
382
Rep 8,033
Posts |
Quote:
Putting the EDC performance/ride height/spring stiffness discussion aside, I am still really puzzled that the car is not riding as low as a 335. I don't buy the bumper/spoiler explanation. It should be trivial to design around those--the way they handled it for the 335. It is clear that there is much to be gained by lowering the CG, and there has to be a pretty solid functional reason why they didn't go for it...
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-26-2008, 11:35 PM | #54 |
Second Lieutenant
20
Rep 293
Posts |
I dont know much but I do know that the RD springs I put on today look damn good(not too low) and the ride isn't bad but I still need to take it in for an alignment it pulls to the right like my golf swing.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-27-2008, 12:46 AM | #55 |
Private
15
Rep 72
Posts |
As far as engineers go, is there really a difference? haha
__________________
2006 BMW M3 | SMG | Jet Black | Black Nappa Leather | Titan Shadow Trim | HK Prem Audio |
Appreciate
0
|
06-27-2008, 10:45 AM | #56 |
Private First Class
7
Rep 176
Posts |
The Guinea pig
Guys,
I have tried to help by providing an objective comment on how the car feels. For the record I actually do have a degree in Automotive engineering and have built F1 engines in the dim and distant past. But my comments were purely subjective. A good friend who has owned a large number of BMW's including 3CSL's two he raced drove the car and has ordered the springs following. We both agreed on the following : 1. There is less jitter on full stiff and the feeling of being usettled on anything but a super smooth road on the stock springs. The feel is better on full stiff with the H&R springs. 2. It does not work well on comfort (I personally never drove the car in this mode) 3. It feels more planted and has more steering feel 4. Body roll is noticeably reduced 5. Comfort and ride feels a little different but does not feel noticeably worse and we both prefer it overall to stock For both of us an improvement over stock Regarding damaging the shocks I do not know how the stock shocks work so can't really add to the debate about 'destroying' the shocks. BUT the 15-25mm ride height reduction will be seen on a stock car on most journeys so I cannot see a logical reason for potential damage. The shocks have not bottomed out since fitment, so again I see no reason for potential damage. Shocks are primarily about damping, with EDC this is variable I would be surprised if this also varied with ride height, very surprised and I can see no reason why it would be desirable to do so unless you intend to use the damper as support for the spring rate under significant bump. This is usually done by the rate of movement, exactly what the damper is all about. As I write I can think of a number of arguments why this would make no sense. My only thought on potential damage would be bottoming dampers and I have not experienced this yet I will see if I can find out more abut the EDC design and comment further. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-27-2008, 12:38 PM | #57 | |
Major General
382
Rep 8,033
Posts |
Quote:
The suggested mode of failure for the shocks is that they might experience higher forces with stiffer springs. Higher damper forces would be caused by higher damper piston velocities. We don't have any specs on the shocks, so we don't know what the safe operation range is. So, I personally don't think we can really conclude anything about what might happen to the shocks over time with aftermarket springs.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2008, 12:11 AM | #58 |
Private First Class
7
Rep 176
Posts |
I am not sure why a stiffer spring would place higher accelerations on the damper ?
For a given bump the stiffer spring would move less and pass more load into the shell. The damper would accelerate less as it will be required to move less over the same bump. There will be more forces on top mounts etc but the damper should have less movement and hence acceleration. I am still not sure what exactly EDC does other than adjust the bump and rebound settings. The interesting point about the dampers is how they adjust in comfort or normal where they are believed to adjust damping during operation. Maybe the acceleration point refers to the sensors and their impact on variable damper settings. But again in full setting it does not lessen the damping to provide a more comfortable ride, I assume this means that the damper is full stiff and cannot stiffen any further without revalving or other mechanical changes. If I was a betting man I would suspect that driving on full stiff on poor road surfaces with stock springs would provide more wear than any setting with marginally shorter and stiffer springs on better surfaces. I also wonder how the US vehicles might vary to Euro spec cars, possible the dampers have different settings. I do know that a lot varies between US and Euro market specs for BMW's and Porsches. What are peoples views of ride and feel in mid vs Full EDC for example ? Accepting that subjective comment is only that |
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2008, 12:22 AM | #59 |
Private First Class
7
Rep 176
Posts |
Oh, By the way I am not defending H&R or supporting any mod I do, if I didn't like them they would be off and in a box in the loft !
There are lots of things I have bought in the past I have regretted !! If I am honest I would not have considered changing if they did not improve the looks (IMO) |
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2008, 06:03 PM | #60 |
Major General
543
Rep 5,498
Posts |
Great discussion here and some good info.
The best evidence or "source data" is probably the many EDC suspensions on both M5's and M6's that have been modified. So far I have not heard of any horror stories involving modified M5/6 EDC suspensions. My gut tells me that in the long run a modified EDC shock/strut will wear faster than an un-modified shock/strut. However, EDC is a unique animal and my experience is based on none adjustable stock shocks/struts that wear much faster with aftermarket springs. Again, my experience is also with springs where the manufacturer suggested afermarket shocks and struts and this case is also unique due to the fact that H&R and RD are certifying their sport springs for use with the stock shocks and struts.... Although there is probably a conflict of interest, I would be interested to see what their responses to these questions would be. Jason
__________________
Instagram: jellismotorwerks |
Appreciate
0
|
08-17-2008, 12:38 PM | #61 |
Private First Class
7
Rep 176
Posts |
I have now driven the car with H&R's for nearly 7,000 miles.
Zero problems, I came back from Europe with over 100 bottles of wine and a car FULL of cases and a passenger. The car was loaded up to the head restraints ! and in the footwells. Although the car was low I drove at speed without bottoming or any suspension issues. I will post a picture when I download the girlfriends pictures H&R well done |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|