|
|
01-10-2010, 05:15 PM | #23 |
//M addicted
6
Rep 128
Posts |
Very Nice write up.... informative and details... I am sure it would so much helps to our member friends (You have the same goal as to many of us).
Thank you for your time to write in this forum. Please keep your update post! |
Appreciate
0
|
01-10-2010, 08:29 PM | #24 | |
Major General
382
Rep 8,033
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-11-2010, 12:44 AM | #25 | |
Captain
80
Rep 961
Posts |
Quote:
According to the advertising, Eibach drops the front 0.8" (yielding 166#), H&R drops it 1.0 # (yielding 160#) and Dinan drops it 1/2" (yielding 177#). Dinan is the only one of the three with the opportunity for stiffer than stock springs, and there's no way to know if they actually stiffened them or if they did a shorter stock-rate spring and a smaller pre-load. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-11-2010, 12:49 AM | #26 |
Second Lieutenant
60
Rep 275
Posts |
What do you think about Eibach springs matched with Bilstein Sport dampers? They have internal bump stops on the front. No idea how much shorter they are then stock.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-11-2010, 12:54 AM | #27 |
Captain
80
Rep 961
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-11-2010, 07:16 AM | #28 | |
Major General
382
Rep 8,033
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-11-2010, 07:21 AM | #29 |
Lieutenant Colonel
174
Rep 1,659
Posts |
I have ordered Bilstein coilovers... I have heard good things about them
__________________
M3 E93 DCT, Space Grey,BC HB29 Forged Deep Concave Wheels, Ericsson Amuse F/R Bumper, Evolve Full Exhaust System, INTRAX Coilovers, STOPTECH BBK, Performance Steering Wheel,Custom Red/Black Leather Seats,///M3 ||Bimmerpost M3 Car Of The Month May - 2010SOLD
2010 R35 GTR |
Appreciate
0
|
01-11-2010, 10:19 AM | #30 | |
Moderator
683
Rep 4,737
Posts |
Quote:
1. Based on my hands-on experience, H&R is stiffer than Dinan, and Dinan is slightly stiffer than stock. 2. H&R is shorter than Dinan, and Dinan is shorter than stock. 3. All three have some type of preload. Stock over 2", Dinan roughly 2", and H&R around 1.5". 4. Static compression on stock springs is not 4". It is actually around 3" max. The shock only has 5.75" of travel; the bumpstop compresses to around 1" max. Therefore we would only get 5.75-4-1=0.75" of bump travel based on 4", which is unrealistic. So how is it possible that H&R is stiffer and create a drop vs. stock? The key is preload. According to #2 above, the stock spring is preloaded by more than 2", which means about 300 to 400 pounds or roughly 50% of the unsprung weight per corner "disappears", which means only 50% of USW is actually used to compress the spring from its perch-to perch-length. H&R has a lot less preload, which means more unsprung weight is used to compress the spring from its perch-to-perch length. This is how it gets away from being stiffer and providing a drop. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-11-2010, 11:09 AM | #31 |
Major General
382
Rep 8,033
Posts |
rldzhao, if the stock spring preload compression is indeed 2" (JAJ's numbers suggest that is more like 0.8"), then that creates even more room for using shorter and stiffer aftermarket springs, and would explain how H&Rs are stiffer and result in 1" drop. I haven't taken any measurements on any of this, so I'm going with what you guys have posted here so far. All I can measure is the natural length of the stock springs as they are in my basement. I believe the fronts are ~11.5".
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-11-2010, 09:13 PM | #35 | |
Moderator
683
Rep 4,737
Posts |
Quote:
Stock front spring: ~12" Front spring (mounted) perch-to-perch distance: ~8" Preload compression: 12"-8"=~4" Which means that the front suspension experiences a preload of roughly: 147 lbm/in * 4 in = ~588 lbm Now, this number may be slightly high because the spring stiffness during the initial 20% of travel is less than 147 lbm/in, which means the preload will be <588 lbm. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-11-2010, 09:33 PM | #38 |
Dr. Octagon
265
Rep 1,919
Posts |
JAJ: Thanks for the extensive write-up.
Just curious, was the EDC option completely out of the question for you when you decided on your vehicle? In other words, were you against it from the beginning from a technological standpoint, or just knew you wanted something that would exceed the EDC's track performance? Do you expect to get similar (or better) comfort or civility with daily driving in your new set-up, or have you foregone using it as a DD all-together? Sorry for all of the questions, but your posts got me to thinking...
__________________
OC ///M
2013 E92 M3 Individual Sold: 2011 E92 M3 SSII | Sold: 2008 E92 M3 SSII | Into a Wall: 2008 E92 M3 SSII | Sold: 2007 E92 335i JB |
Appreciate
0
|
01-11-2010, 10:02 PM | #39 | |
Major General
382
Rep 8,033
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-11-2010, 11:51 PM | #40 |
Captain
80
Rep 961
Posts |
Gentlemen
First, let me say I didn't have a charitable bone in my body when I did the work - I did it for me! I wanted to upgrade my suspension. It was only after I'd put the data together that I realized it might be useful for others. Second, my measurements are as best as I could do them with the suspension still on the car. Some, like the droop of 4", I'm pretty sure of. Others, like the depth of the front and rear bump stops, I'm good within 1/4 inch, but probably no better. Other members, like RLDZHAO, will do better because they can measure the components when they're off the car. Third, my assessment of the four "types" of suspension are generic and not intended to either criticize or endorse any particular product. Suspensions, at least at the level of "track day" and below, are not particularly finicky. I once ran 400# per inch rear racing springs (an increase of more than double the stock rate) on my E39 M5 with street-spec non-adjustable dampers (Koni FSD). The car rode like a limousine on the road and was superb on the track in the rain; only when the track dried was it obvious that the rear damping was softer than optimal. The damper settings for compression and rebound, even when they're perfect, are a compromise. The needed "resistive" settings vary as the square root of the spring rate, so a 20% increase in the spring rate only changes the damper settings by 10%, which frankly is probably less than the margin of error in the manufacturing tolerances. What's more, the car's damping needs change depending on whether you're cornering or going straight. The front sway bar couples both front sides together. Your carefully chosen spring rate and damper setting go out the window when the (undamped) sway bar drags the springs and dampers on the other side of the car into the calculations as you go around a corner. What's more, the rear suspension gets involved too. If it rolls more easily and farther than the front, it transfers weight forward in a turn. The damper setting has to be good enough, but perfect is just not feasible, even with four-way adjustable racing kit. My point is that it's way too easy to over-think suspension design and settings for street-track vehicles. Your choice of seats will have as big an effect on lap-times as your suspension. Pick a reputable supplier, follow the instructions, and once you know how the kit works, make incremental changes one at a time with care. YMMV, naturally. Last edited by JAJ; 01-12-2010 at 12:12 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-12-2010, 12:08 AM | #41 | |
Captain
80
Rep 961
Posts |
Quote:
When I bought the third or fourth E92 M3 delivered by my dealer in March 2008, just as the cars first hit the market in Canada, I knew I didn't want anything they hadn't delivered in production before (except for the S65, and that was a really just copy of the S85 with the VANOS fixed). The car was inbound when I chose it, and I didn't have the option of EDC. At the time I thought that was a good thing, having just removed the Ground Control suspension from my E39 M5 so I could sell it. I was pretty sure that I'd eventually upgrade the M3 suspension, and I just couldn't imagine EDC making it easier. Because the car was early delivery, I have 6MT too, since DCT didn't come out for another six months. Again, I'm happy that I don't have it, regardless of how good it finally became after two years of bug fixes. So the answer to your question is "I was skeptical at the time, so I bought the simplest configuration that was available" on the assumption it would also be the most trouble-free. I wasn't disappointed; the car has been flawless since I picked it up. As for DD use, in the summer of 2007 I decided that the $3,000 a year I was spending on gas, insurance and parking was a waste of money (it could be better spent on R-Comps, rims and upgrades) so I switched to public transit for commuting. I drive the M3 about 8,000 miles a year now, and a lot of it is highway or track time. I DO want a car that's pleasant to drive, though, even if I don't drive it all the time. Vancouver roads are nasty in some parts of the city, and I want my creature comforts intact. Last edited by JAJ; 01-12-2010 at 12:35 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-12-2010, 12:24 PM | #42 |
Major General
382
Rep 8,033
Posts |
JAJ, as I mentioned before, the information and opinions you posted in this thread are highly appreciated. That said, I think follow up discussion aimed at the clarification/correction of some of what has been posted is constructive.
You make a good point about a statically calibrated system not being able to achieve optimum damping at all times in real world conditions. That is somewhat different for a dynamically calibrated system, and I wonder about the degree of adjustability of the OEM EDC dampers and what kind of inputs the programming considers apart from just the velocity across the element.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 12:53 AM | #43 | |
Captain
80
Rep 961
Posts |
Quote:
In other news, I've spent some spare time in the last couple of days shopping for accelerometer chips and data capture boxes. I'm going to have a go at figuring out how to adjust the dampers by combining measured dynamic data with seat-of-the-pants feel. This is going to be fun. I'll keep y'all posted... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 06:36 AM | #44 | |
Major General
382
Rep 8,033
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|