|
|
03-21-2012, 11:35 PM | #23 | |
Banned
82
Rep 2,688
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-22-2012, 08:38 AM | #24 | ||
Colonel
69
Rep 2,194
Posts |
Quote:
At night time it looks nice with all the buttons in comparison to BMW Idrive with less buttons but touching them you feel the difference in quality. The seats are. Ice. It don't hold you as tight as the M3 and the center console and middle part that is painted silver in the Audi looks cheap. I have the carbon fiber look in my M and it looks ten times nicer. The silver in the M just doesn't look nice.
__________________
2012 E92-M3 Space Grey on Fox Red, DCT
2011 B8 S4 S-Tronic , Black on magma red |
||
Appreciate
0
|
03-22-2012, 12:04 PM | #25 |
Lieutenant
36
Rep 523
Posts |
Go with the M3.... A good friend of mine has a 2012 S5. Its very nice, nice interior, and I love how the trunk opens automatically when you hit the trunk release. Also, the manuel trans shifts a lot smoother in the S5 then my 6MT M3. I really dont like the stereo/nav/multi media system. I'm sure after some time playing with it, you will become very familiar but its complicated as a passenger.... The other thing I dont like about my friend's S5 is that he has a sunroof that doenst open. It only tilts. Also, in my M3 there is a panel that slides forward or backwards to block the sun, in my buddy's S5, there is a mesh screen that filters the sun from coming in... I think its pretty cheap in my opinion... I believe that the S5 just isnt on the same playing field performance wise. I have driven his S5 and it just doesnt have that power. We have raced several times and I have walked away from him everytime. Out of the whole he does well with the AWD, but I always pull away. My M3 also handles so much better. His S5 feels soft....
Now an RS5, would be a differnet story but I would take an S5.... But get what you like.. Your the one driving it and paying for it.....
__________________
BMC filter, OEM Exh Mod, ESS Direct Flash tune, flat black kidney grills, color painted front reflectors, LUX Angel eyes, -2012 SVT Raptor 4 dr -09 E90 M3
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-22-2012, 02:27 PM | #26 | |
4th down; 4th quarter? Renegade.
87
Rep 3,850
Posts |
Quote:
My personal experience, and those of my friends, are that Audi's have pretty terrible quality. I had an C5 A6 2.7T - turd...everything broke Wife had B6 A4 1.8T - diet turd...many things broke; supply chain issues getting replacement Former boss just bought a new A6 - suspension was screwed up after one week and parts on national backorder... In general, I would recommend that no one buy a first model year car or engine from any manufacturer unless you don't mind a little downtime. Good luck! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-22-2012, 04:26 PM | #28 | |
Colonel
69
Rep 2,194
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2012 E92-M3 Space Grey on Fox Red, DCT
2011 B8 S4 S-Tronic , Black on magma red |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-22-2012, 06:41 PM | #29 | |
Brigadier General
230
Rep 3,899
Posts |
Quote:
As this salesman is obviously such an expert on cars = please ask him to explain in detail how even the RS5 with 444hp and all of Audi's factory RS handling enhancements still falls short of the M3 in both straight line speed and handling - if he can turn a bog standard S5 into an M3 beater for $2K i would suggest that he contacts Audi Gmbh as soon as possible - they have been trying to find a guy like him for years!!
__________________
2014 AW F80 M3 DCT
2011 AW E90 M3 DCT - Sold 2010 JZB E90 M3 DCT - Sold 2009 6MT E90 LCI 335i M -Sport - Sold |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-22-2012, 08:10 PM | #30 |
Enlisted Member
16
Rep 35
Posts |
Hey All,
I believe his reasoning is that it will be producing around 410 hp, with the sports differential and the increased torque + awd, he said it will outperform the M3. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2012, 01:33 AM | #31 |
Colonel
1099
Rep 2,286
Posts |
Yes - however ss134 is saying that if a 444 hp RS5 can't beat a stock M3 in either straight line or on track - how could a 410 hp s5 (with less hp than rs5 and inferior handling to rs5) beat a stock M3?
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2012, 07:32 AM | #32 | |
Major General
593
Rep 5,396
Posts |
Quote:
the rs5 has the old torque-less 4.2 liter which was only slightly upgraded from the old rs4. it is also even heavier than the s5 iirc. the s5 with those mods will likely make a decent bit more whp than the rs5 and certainly have more wtq. that said, straight line is the only thing performance wise that car can do compared to an m3. I test drove a 6mt B8 s4 before buying my m3. The transmission is a lot better though.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2012, 08:15 AM | #33 |
Enlisted Member
16
Rep 35
Posts |
I think even if I end up buying the S5 over the M3, I will not tune it. Since I do not plan to track the car, I feel as if I will not be "using" the M3 to it's full capabilities on the streets (at least without getting arrested).
To be honest I'm leaning towards the S5... it seems like a comfortable, luxurious car that can be used as a sports car on those beautiful days you just want to drive with the windows down. I feel as if with an exhaust system it will have both the proper sound, looks, and comfort. With the M3, I feel that it is more of a brutish sports car... the redline is 8,300 RPM! Also, I feel that the interior may be a bit dated. Given my preferences, I will probably go with the new S5 (V6 engine), coupled with the DCT and all the goodies... rear view camera, blind spot checkers, etc. That's assuming Audi doesn't act like Audi and refuse to discount the car... |
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2012, 08:43 AM | #34 | |
Brigadier General
2109
Rep 4,299
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2012, 09:04 AM | #35 | |
Colonel
87
Rep 2,464
Posts |
A co worker did the similar (went with S4), I still don't know why... I just can't understand.
M3 is nowhere close to be a brutish sports car. It is a very sporty, quite comfortable, GT car. If your justification for not getting the M3 is because you won't track it, well S5 is not a slow car either. You should get A5 with 2 liter turbo. Quote:
__________________
2011 MINI Cooper S
previous cars: E92 M3, Z4MC, Z4 Roadster, E36 328 Sedan |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2012, 09:39 AM | #36 |
Enlisted Member
16
Rep 35
Posts |
I just think the M3 needs to be driven hard to be enjoyed... and I feel like the S5 has more low end torque, looks better, and has a better interior. I'm not a race car driver... the extra 0.3 seconds to 60 mph doesn't really matter... I'm assuming driving dynamics will be very similar for both of them as they are both top notch german companies.. the rest is preference no?
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2012, 09:42 AM | #37 | |
4th down; 4th quarter? Renegade.
87
Rep 3,850
Posts |
Quote:
Driving dynamics in the M3 are totally superior; quality as well, at least in my experience. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2012, 09:43 AM | #38 | |
Moderator
7526
Rep 19,368
Posts |
+1 on everything
And ironically, if you look at his info, it says he has an A5 3.2 right now. People want to talk themselves out of an M3 for a lot of different reasons. You can talk yourself out of a car pretty easily if you go onto a forum like M3Post, tune out all the facts, and dismiss everything else as fanboyism. We've seen this happen plenty of times. And we've also seen what happens next plenty of times too: weeks, months, years, later the guy comes back after having gotten to drive his buddy's M3. He has a long story about how he regretted getting the 335i/S4/S5/IS-F/G35, etc, etc., and says he has an M3 on order. So, OP, please do yourself a favor and NEVER get into an M3 once you have your car. You need to keep make sure you remain secure in your decision. Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2012, 09:50 AM | #39 | |
4th down; 4th quarter? Renegade.
87
Rep 3,850
Posts |
Quote:
Luckily, Audi and their manipulative and inferior supply chain couldn't get me one, or even a date for delivery. After 6 months of feeling like I was dealing with a teenager instead of a major auto company, I went to drive the M3. Negotiated the deal within 2 weeks after that; had my custom-ordered M3 5 weeks after that IIRC. I like to think someone "up there" was looking out for me ; ) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2012, 09:55 AM | #40 | |
Colonel
87
Rep 2,464
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2011 MINI Cooper S
previous cars: E92 M3, Z4MC, Z4 Roadster, E36 328 Sedan |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2012, 09:58 AM | #41 | |||||
Moderator
7526
Rep 19,368
Posts |
As long as you are comfortable going by what you think vs. what might actually be the case, then I absolutely agree you are making the right decision.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2012, 09:58 AM | #42 | |
Banned
82
Rep 2,688
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2012, 10:27 AM | #43 |
Enlisted Member
16
Rep 35
Posts |
I'm sorry if I upset some of you in saying that I want to choose the S5. I don't want you to think that I don't like the M3 at all, a few of my close buddies have it and love it. I'm just worried about a few things that the normal m3 driver might not even consider. For example, I live in a pretty snowy area... The M3 is an okay winter performer but it does not compare to the awd system... Another thing... I will be driving this car for at least 2-3 hours per day... It needs to be very comfortable and luxurious.. The M3 is already a dated interior and exterior given the recent f30 release... All in all I just want a quick, great looking, comfortable sports car. And I feel like the s5 fits the criteria. I have owned this a5 for 3 years with no problem whatsoever... But I felt that all it was missing was that little bit of power when merging into a highway or traffic maneuvers...
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2012, 10:56 AM | #44 | |
Colonel
87
Rep 2,464
Posts |
Quote:
Btw, comfortable sports car sounds like a fat triathlete. Both qualities are against each other.
__________________
2011 MINI Cooper S
previous cars: E92 M3, Z4MC, Z4 Roadster, E36 328 Sedan |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|