|
|
04-16-2014, 11:37 AM | #397 | |
Private First Class
80
Rep 143
Posts |
Quote:
You are the only ESS rep whom I know personally "face to face" and my attitude to a MAN whom I once recognized personally as good guy and had 5 years relations, could not be changed irrespective of anything Saying this, I have no personal negative to you and this thread is all about bad product from ESS only and ESS reaction to the customer's claims that the product was really bad I would comment your first appearance from December in the form of factual statements. 1. God helps me to have money required to have a possibility to look on such shit with a smile. Thus, if ESS did not like to pay for their mistake, no problem. 2. Irrespective of what went wrong, i.e. Aeromotive fuel pump, Aeromotive FPR etc., ESS personally installed them and is responsible for their work cause the only obligation from my side was gently fulfilled - I paid ESS the full amount for the work done and parts installed. If ESS did not agree with such a proposition - this is the end, nothing to talk about. 3. Going to the "overboosted stock engines: Hans, my first engine was not overboosted, it was loaded by 92mm SC pulley resulting to 8 psi, ie your normal 650 kit. The engine did 70,000 miles and hundreds of runs - enough, I think Second engine was overboosted by 1 psi only per AJ calculations and that setup was used only for one day for 5 runs and using 100 RON only. That is it! But OK, it was overboosted, so my fault Third engine was completely built by ESS and was broken due to ESS fuel system. Fact. No fault from my side. You should do your work 100% and receive money. If you claim afterwards that the project is beta one, once I informed about the issues, that is ESS approach, not market best practice, and that is ESS problem. 4. If you feel gauges are so necessary, install them and that is it. 5. I am not using your second FueLab FPR, cause it was also of poor quality with a leakage from the body... 6. I am not using that Aeromotive pump. I am not using my stock M3 pump, cause you broke the body by making holes in it... 7. I am not using your stock fuel rails. What I am running is new OEM M3 fuel pump, new OEM 335 pump and modified OEM fuel rails with modified OEM sending unit 8. If ESS consider that rubber fuel lines being covered by OEM plastic under the car as non-dangerous, that is ESS problem, but the car is mine and my life is my life... 9. I am not telling stories and not blaming ESS. Just facts and photos. ESS in its turn did tell real stories by stipulating their "facts" from their book of tales 10. Forget about the possibility to return the car back that time... No way! My visa expired next day after the pick-up, lots of personal things and 10$k just for the road and back to ESS with the clear message from ESS that the car is damaged by me, no warranty, hourly rates, no timeline etc... It was a joke from ESS! For 10$k I repaired the car in 2 months and made it significantly stronger from engine and fuel system perspectives. Good luck! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-16-2014, 11:46 AM | #398 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
429
Rep 1,947
Posts |
Quote:
BTW, I'm pretty stunned at your comment that some A/F pump makers use black+, and red-. I never thought to ask the pump maker about that. Maybe if I get time, I'll see if I can find the installation manual of the pump online somewhere...to see what it says. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-16-2014, 02:46 PM | #399 | |
Captain
92
Rep 850
Posts |
Quote:
The car would run with a reverse wired pump. Unlike what Sergei's words might suggest, the secondary pump wouldn't start pumping fuel in the wrong direction. It would just do nothing and act more like a restrictive point for the primary pump. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-16-2014, 03:04 PM | #400 | |
Private First Class
80
Rep 143
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-07-2014, 03:02 PM | #402 |
Private First Class
80
Rep 143
Posts |
All is ok! I've already passed 3,000 miles and last weekend won Moscow Unlim 500+ 1,000m and 1/4 mile event for RWD cars!!!
The results: 60f = 1,93; 1/4 mile = 11,02s with trap 136,01 mph; 1,000m = 19,62s with trap 174,19 mph. Temp was quite hot (28C) and the road surface was really poor compared to US drag strips.... But 315/30/18 Hoosier Drag Radials did their job!!! By the way, 1/4 mile time is Russian record for RWD car of any power at this event from 2009 All runs were made in MDM mode for DSC and from 600 rpms Fuel was 102 RON. Dry ice was used to cool down the car To compare with other cars there: 1. Aventador LP700 = 19,85s for 1,000m standing start; 2. Porsche 991 Turbo S = 19,9s for 1,000m standing start; 3. Porsche 911 Turbo Stage 2+ on MS109 (650 HP) = 19,75s for 1,000m standing start; 4. Corvette ZR1 full bolt-ons (850 HP) = 19,95s; 5. Corvette Z06 full bolt-ons (707 HP) = 20,5s. All of them had also significantly less 1,000m trap speed I am just happy!!! Last edited by filinm3; 06-08-2014 at 04:44 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-08-2014, 05:43 AM | #404 | |
Captain
23
Rep 638
Posts |
Quote:
1/4 mile MPH means you have the worlds fastest E9x then! What tires were you on? any decent 60-130's from it? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-08-2014, 06:56 AM | #405 | |
Private First Class
80
Rep 143
Posts |
Quote:
Tires: Hoosier Drag Radials with white letters 315/30/18 As for 60-130 do not know, but 0-100 kmh was 4.0s, 0-200kmh was 9.4s and 0-217,5 kmh was 11,02, thus 60-130 mph was near 6,5s |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-08-2014, 08:55 AM | #406 |
Lieutenant Colonel
429
Rep 1,947
Posts |
Congrats Sergei on the great results. Did you have a vBox or AIM-Solo on your car? We can extract 60-130's from that if you did.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-09-2014, 10:40 AM | #407 | |
Private First Class
80
Rep 143
Posts |
Quote:
You know that substantial part of that success goes to you! Thank you again for ALL you did for me so kindly As for Vbox, no, nothing was installed in my car due to incorrect work of any equipment in that forest place... I would try sometime to measure 60-130 mph. As of now, I did measure 100-200 kmh starting from 50kmh at 2nd gear and my best result is 5.1s in 10C and 5.4-5.7c in 17-18C. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-09-2014, 11:17 AM | #408 |
Brigadier General
529
Rep 4,054
Posts |
Nice work Sergei, glad to hear she's up and running well, those are impressive results!
__________________
24 G82 Xdrive Comp
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ 08 ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ 08 E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|