|
|
05-06-2024, 10:14 AM | #3037 |
Major General
2467
Rep 5,929
Posts |
I’m aware of one engine that had BE bearings that failed but the failure was due to main bearing failure. The first RB, which was next to the main that failed, was scuffed up a little but did not spin. All of the others looked brand new. This was on a motor pretty much used primary on track.
|
Appreciate
1
Assimilator1595.50 |
05-18-2024, 02:59 PM | #3038 |
I6 + TT = FTW
108
Rep 865
Posts |
Just put in BE bearings as preventative maintenance at 124,800 miles on my 2011 e90 M3. Looks like I didn’t need to but glad it’s done.
|
Appreciate
1
Assimilator1595.50 |
05-18-2024, 05:42 PM | #3039 |
Major General
2467
Rep 5,929
Posts |
Yes, they look pretty good for the mileage. However, by swapping to RBs with increased clearance, it minimizes the probability of an engine failure due to a RB(s). I know I feel more comfortable taking my two e92 M3s to 8600 rpm (stage two tunes with raised redline). I changed to BE RBs with BE/ARP 2000 rod bolts at 20k miles and 25k miles. For the mileage, some of my bearings (can’t find pics ��) looked worse than yours. Engines were always properly warmed up with < 3000 rpm and waited an additional 10 min after full redline is available to ensure engine, DCT and diff are at their appropriate operating temperatures. Anyway, congrats on your RB replacement.
|
Appreciate
1
PiZauL108.00 |
05-18-2024, 06:23 PM | #3040 | |
I6 + TT = FTW
108
Rep 865
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
Assimilator1595.50 |
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|