|
|
02-05-2010, 07:41 PM | #1 |
Lieutenant Colonel
68
Rep 1,676
Posts |
M3 Stroker VS M6/M5
i have a friend who is one of those guys that just thinks his car is the greatest and nothing can beat it and when he gets beat there is always an excuse.
i think the best was when a friend of ours with and older P 930 turbo that has some mods, old car but wicked fast. the 930 just flat out beat him and he said it was bc he didn't press his power button and let him win. lmao so i told him that i think a M3 stroker whether it be a Dinan or a RS one will give his M5 a run for his money. he said i am nuts that his M5 will smoke a stroker m3 i mean am i crazy or would it be a close run. in all comp times. like 0-60, 1/4 mile, 60-100, etc etc with the stroker the numbers are close on both cars any thoughts on how these would stack up or any experience btw the two cars?? thanks H
__________________
Street- 08 E92 M3- Sparkling Graphite/ Fox Red/6sp
Track- 10 CRF 250-PR2 Race Motor/Ohlins TTX Susp Hauler- 06 Ford Skyjacker F250 4WD |
|
02-05-2010, 08:23 PM | #2 |
M-Sport
22
Rep 174
Posts |
M3 stroker engine: 3600lb, 500+ hp
M5 stock engine: 4000lb, 500 hp M3 wins in the above comparison. Now an M5 with DINAN stroker, 625 HP is a different story. The M3 is going to need a supercharger. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-05-2010, 11:12 PM | #3 |
Track Addict
117
Rep 813
Posts
Drives: 2010 BMW M3 E92 | 2008 Z4M E86
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Orange County, California
|
Sorry but your friend is nuts. Sounds like one of mine until I shoved proof multiple times in his face.. Now he stays quiet.
__________________
BMW ///M3 Coupe
Completed November 16, 2009 Received December 29,2009 |
Appreciate
0
|
02-06-2010, 02:17 AM | #5 |
Lieutenant Colonel
68
Rep 1,676
Posts |
i know he is nuts. the most funny part is my boy with the old 930 gas pedal got stuck on the carpet so he still had one more gear to pull, lmao and my buddy still thinks he let him win. i am like dude wtf are you on
yeah i just wish i had the money to do the stroker or sc so i could wax his ass all day long over and over again numerous runs no matter what he smokes that day thanks for the info i knew i wasn't crazy
__________________
Street- 08 E92 M3- Sparkling Graphite/ Fox Red/6sp
Track- 10 CRF 250-PR2 Race Motor/Ohlins TTX Susp Hauler- 06 Ford Skyjacker F250 4WD |
Appreciate
0
|
02-06-2010, 03:38 AM | #7 |
Lieutenant Colonel
68
Rep 1,676
Posts |
no argue here just a simple question. man i didn't realize there was threads of this comparo before. i mean its not like i put a 335i vs m3 thread up or something jeeze
__________________
Street- 08 E92 M3- Sparkling Graphite/ Fox Red/6sp
Track- 10 CRF 250-PR2 Race Motor/Ohlins TTX Susp Hauler- 06 Ford Skyjacker F250 4WD |
Appreciate
0
|
02-06-2010, 04:41 AM | #8 |
Lieutenant
68
Rep 470
Posts |
At any speed the E9X M3 Stroker should have an edge.
Low speeds, M3 will have weight advantage. High speeds, M3 Stroker has SLIGHTLY more power & torque .. Both Drag coefficients are around .30-.31.. So M3 will have slight advantage there too. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-06-2010, 08:42 AM | #9 |
Second Lieutenant
12
Rep 294
Posts
Drives: 2010 CTS-V sedan, black raven
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hainesport, New Jersey
|
One of the fastest M3 I've seen on video was a modified E46 HPF stage 2.5.
It absolutely destroys any stock E60 M5. Then the stroker M5 came along and killed it. I agree with Footie, this modified vs stock comparo's really are meaningless. There's always going to be something faster than you. Just enjoy what you're driving...
__________________
Current rides: 2010 CTS-V sedan, black raven; 2010 Cadillac Escalade ESV, black raven
Gone but not forgotten: 2008 M5, metallic sapphire black, SMG; 2004 645ci, metallic sapphire black, SMG |
Appreciate
0
|
02-06-2010, 06:57 PM | #10 | |
Banned
5
Rep 20
Posts |
Quote:
Just kidding to each his own. But please stop bringing m3's to drag races ITS NOT GOOD AT IT Last edited by FR33160; 02-06-2010 at 07:02 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-06-2010, 07:29 PM | #11 | |
Major
65
Rep 1,211
Posts |
PencilGeek's RD sport stroker M3 even with an ultra-tall swapped 3.15:1 ratio for supercharging walked a stock M5 like it was not even racing. Imagine what would have happened if he had the stock 3.85:1 ratio.
Again, it is a modified vs stock comparison so not fair. A stroker M5 is a monster. Quote:
DLSJ5's basic bolt-on M3 has run 11.8@~120 mph (I will not even get into his supercharged version that he has now which is trapping over 130 mph) and you are claiming it is not good at drag racing?? A typical 335 owner. Sour grapes.
__________________
""A great sounding, responsive, high-revving, naturally aspirated engine is part of the DNA of a thoroughbred sports car. No two ways about it."
- Lamborghini on turbocharging Last edited by 330CIZHP; 02-06-2010 at 10:28 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2010, 12:20 AM | #12 |
PCA, BMWCCA
103
Rep 2,058
Posts |
Have to agree here. My philosophy is to buy the power/performance level you desire. I try to keep my cars as close to bone stock as possible. I don't ever buy things with the intent to make it more than it is already. Besides, the more powerful you make it the less you can tap into the full power on a routine basis...especially in the US.
__________________
'08 Carrera S 6MT Guards Red/Black ext leather, Carbon fiber pkg, sport exh, sport chrono +, PASM, Nav, Bose, 19" forged turbos, red tranny tunnel
'07 MV Agusta F4 1000 R 1+1, Corse Red/Silver, RG3 race pipes and factory race ECU |
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2010, 02:41 AM | #13 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
68
Rep 1,676
Posts |
i respectfully disagree
some people like to mod or play with there cars as a hobby etc other people mod bc they want some extra power after driving there car for awhile and sometimes a mod or two and make it feel ike a new car again without getting a new car also some will mod this car bc to get to a level that has the power/ performance that is alot more then a M3 you will need to step up the price alot in my opinion. the M3 is a great all round car and anything in my mind that is alot more power and faster and as good handling is over 100k car if not well over. i agree when you go stroker or something like that then it is at that point not cheap anymore and falls close to where you could of got another car instead that had that performance numbers. but some people don't like those cars and want the usable space an M3 has but want the power and speed of what the other 100k plus cars have. different strokes for different folks and what makes them happy is all that matters in my opinion whether that be leaving it stock or modding the piss out of it Quote:
__________________
Street- 08 E92 M3- Sparkling Graphite/ Fox Red/6sp
Track- 10 CRF 250-PR2 Race Motor/Ohlins TTX Susp Hauler- 06 Ford Skyjacker F250 4WD |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2010, 09:50 AM | #14 |
Major General
1208
Rep 8,034
Posts |
I have nothing wrong with modifing your cars, it's something I personally don't agree with but each to their own. Though when debating cars and which is better then how can you discuss this objectively.
I have ordered a new S4 to replace the Jag and if I was the sort to tune my cars I could also claim that my S4 if 'tuned' would be a better car than an M3 but as I ain't I will never claim such a thing because in stock form the S4 isn't of that caliber. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2010, 02:29 PM | #15 |
Private First Class
6
Rep 109
Posts
Drives: 997 Turbo E90 M3
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Everywhere
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2004 E55 AMG 卖 [0.00]
2010 BMW 128 卖 [0.00] 2007 BMW 335 卖 [0.00] 2003 Mitsu Evo ... [0.00] 2003 Porsche 911 Tu ... [0.00] 2014 Honda Accord V ... [0.00] 2013 BMW 335 xDrive ... [0.00] 2005 BMW M3 卖 [0.00] 2002 BMW M3 卖 [0.00] |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2010, 03:05 PM | #16 |
Brigadier General
529
Rep 4,054
Posts |
No, because it never happened! lol, I think there was one run with th 2.5 on pump that was close for a bit, but no NA M5 is going to touch a 2.5 HPF E46 M3.
__________________
24 G82 Xdrive Comp
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ 08 ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ 08 E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH |
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2010, 03:52 PM | #17 | |
Private First Class
6
Rep 109
Posts
Drives: 997 Turbo E90 M3
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Everywhere
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2004 E55 AMG 卖 [0.00]
2010 BMW 128 卖 [0.00] 2007 BMW 335 卖 [0.00] 2003 Mitsu Evo ... [0.00] 2003 Porsche 911 Tu ... [0.00] 2014 Honda Accord V ... [0.00] 2013 BMW 335 xDrive ... [0.00] 2005 BMW M3 卖 [0.00] 2002 BMW M3 卖 [0.00] |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2010, 05:18 PM | #19 | |
Brigadier General
529
Rep 4,054
Posts |
Quote:
Those runs were not close, but there was one run where the stroker M5 did very well, that was close, but the 2.5 was on pump and I believe lost traction at the start. On pump the HPF 2.5 hits 60-130 in 7.03 seconds, the Stroker M5's best time was 8.68, of course on race fuel it's a whole different ball game as the HPF 2.5 does it in 5.75, for comparisons sake a Bugatti Veyron does it in 5.6.
__________________
24 G82 Xdrive Comp
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ 08 ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ 08 E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH Last edited by DLSJ5; 02-07-2010 at 08:19 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2010, 05:38 PM | #20 |
Major General
1208
Rep 8,034
Posts |
Not contain to argue on modified vs stock we appear to have moved on to arguing between modified vs modified and now pump fuel vs racing fuel.
This thread has gone from being funny to plain laughable. Sorry guys but this appears to be a dick length contest and nothing else. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2010, 06:14 PM | #21 |
Lieutenant Colonel
68
Rep 1,676
Posts |
wow this wasn't my intent for this thread just to get some simple info on two different cars. it appears it has turned way away from that and others like to just not input anything useful but just posts about how stupid it is etc. so be it
mods if you could just delete please that would be greatly appreciated
__________________
Street- 08 E92 M3- Sparkling Graphite/ Fox Red/6sp
Track- 10 CRF 250-PR2 Race Motor/Ohlins TTX Susp Hauler- 06 Ford Skyjacker F250 4WD |
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2010, 07:07 PM | #22 | |
79
Rep 248
Posts |
Quote:
Last edited by Scott@Radar-Mirror.com; 02-07-2010 at 10:16 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|