View Single Post
      06-07-2010, 06:43 PM   #960
DLSJ5
Brigadier General
DLSJ5's Avatar
United_States
501
Rep
4,033
Posts

Drives: 2016 F82 M4 ZCP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by PencilGeek View Post
Yes I was being very simplified on purpose -- simply to point out that some people believe adaptations increase performance even though it seems to run contrary to common sense. In order to believe that the ECU increases performance with adaptations, a person would have to believe that without adaptations the car would be running more "conservative" -- then the adaptations would cause it to run more "aggressive." That reasoning never made any sense to me.
Did you not see a 30whp difference with race fuel on your car, after you drove through a full tank of 100 octane and it "adapted"?

The ECU adaptations are based on other factors, yes, but octane level has a great effect, it's quite simple, if you run poor fuel the ECU will adapt and pull back, if you run better grade fuel it should adapt the other way, and it will do this on the dyno as well.
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ
ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ
Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH
Appreciate 0