View Single Post
      08-30-2013, 07:41 AM   #102
kawasaki00
Lieutenant Colonel
kawasaki00's Avatar
United_States
233
Rep
1,673
Posts

Drives: SG-E92 ESS-650 BPM Tune
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Charlotte NC

iTrader: (11)

Quote:
Originally Posted by regular guy View Post
As best I can tell, these are the same rod bearing part numbers since the beginning of S65 production. I searched realoem by part number, and I checked some old receipts for S65 engine builds. I have build receipts from late 2008 and another from 2011, and another from 2013, and they all use these same part numbers. The 2008 receipt lists the M5 rod bearing bottom part number, and I think that might be because the parts list wasn't yet available. ??? But I do know that realoem lists the 1702 bearing as the only bottom bearing ever used on the S65, and the 1703 bearing shared with S85 and S65 during the entire production run.



S85 uses the same blue rod bearing (top shell: 11 24 784 1703) as S65, but has a different red bearing (bottom shell: 11 24 783 8088).
when you did the builds did you measure shell thickness and height on the red vs blue. What is perplexing and I have brought this up before is clevite paints those bearings, I have a entire drawer full of red blue yellow and green bearings at work that are painted in the exact fashion. The red shells are standard and the blue shells are +.001, yellow is +.0005 and green is -.001. This is clevites standard system. If that is not the case here it is baffling why they would paint the shells when there is no difference. Also if they were the same size why would there be two part numbers?
__________________
Electronics Junkie, Engine Builder.
Appreciate 0