Quote:
Originally Posted by Sal@Evolve
Depends on what correction factors you want to compare.
Trying to compare different dyno's with different cars and different conditions is not recommended at all.
We can deliver far more torque at low rpm if we want to with valve overlap changes reverted back to stock.
Consistency of power is the most important part of a performance solution.
This we have shown.
We look forward to putting our kit up against the Harrop system like we have other systems of higher quoted HP and dyno numbers.
|
Yes it will be good to see which is best for a track and street driven manual. Harrop is actually claiming a lower peak HP compared to Evolve. It it is me that is claiming DynoJet figures may be up 10% higher than the Dynapack. Also I'm referring to uncorrected Evolve Dynojet graph and uncorrected Harrop Dynapack figures.
Harrop Dynapack without correction:
3000 RPM: 339wtq, 194whp
5000 RPM: 398wtq, 379whp
7000 RPM: 375wtq, 500whp
Evolve Dynojet without correction:
3000 RPM: 150wtq, 150whp
5000 RPM: 350wtq, 320whp
7000 RPM: 350wtq, 475whp
Source:
http://www.m3post.com/forums/attachm...1&d=1381538911