View Single Post
      02-24-2009, 03:24 PM   #14
Lieutenant General
Technic's Avatar

Drives: 2015 320i
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ft Lauderdale, Florida

iTrader: (18)

Originally Posted by !Xoible View Post
no, not at all. it's not about having simplest code otherwise we'd be stuck with VB6 which is simple but is a nightmare!

having a good code base to make everything configurable and promoting re-use heavily is the good practice. having dynamic buttons and controls promotes re-use.

in terms of HCI (human-computer interaction) simplicity and straightforward-ness is the way to go.
That's what I meant for "simplest", a great -not just good- code source where the rest can be built upon and re-use with minimum changes. That where the dynamism should come from, not from different "pieces".

So multiple screens with individual functions maps is not simple, as you are mostly re-coding and not mostly reusing code.