View Single Post
      07-22-2019, 05:13 PM   #51
Lucrecio84
Captain
Lucrecio84's Avatar
United_States
250
Rep
794
Posts

Drives: TTE92 m3/ F10 CP M5
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Anaheim, California

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8500RPM View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcolley View Post
Dependent upon material choice, rod length choice and design, piston weight, etc, a stroker rotating assembly can easily be lighter than stock, especially the reciprocating mass if stock rod length isn't retained. This actually reduces the tensile stress on the rods at higher RPM.

Agreed on wall thickness though, not a fan of significantly increasing the bores on these motors since most of them get a lackluster tune after stroking anyway. That makes the additional .1 or .2L worthless.
I agree a stroker rotating assembly can easily be lighter than stock, but for sure a stock bore/stroke forged internal build would be even lighter than that. A little stroke would help spool the turbos faster but properly sized turbos on a 4L V8 should have little to no lag anyways.

This interesting gentleman is not even in the efficiency range of those turbos yet. Once he pushes past 20PSI is when this thing will really start making serious power.

OP: What turbos are you running again?
I am running twin 30r tial xona's
__________________

GINTANI TWIN TURBO E92/F10 M5
Appreciate 1