Quote:
Originally Posted by saxonb
Yes it will be good to see which is best for a track and street driven manual. Harrop is actually claiming a lower peak HP compared to Evolve. It it is me that is claiming DynoJet figures may be up 10% higher than the Dynapack. Also I'm referring to uncorrected Evolve Dynojet graph and uncorrected Harrop Dynapack figures.
Harrop Dynapack without correction:
3000 RPM: 339wtq, 194whp
5000 RPM: 398wtq, 379whp
7000 RPM: 375wtq, 500whp
Evolve Dynojet without correction:
3000 RPM: 150wtq, 150whp
5000 RPM: 350wtq, 320whp
7000 RPM: 350wtq, 475whp
Source: http://www.m3post.com/forums/attachm...1&d=1381538911 |
I guess we will see what happens when they are released and tested.
What you also have to bare in mind is thermal efficiency. As inlet air temperatures rise the power will begin to suffer very quickly.
One pull on a dyno tells you nothing at all about how a setup will perform in the real world once those temperatures start rising.
Our kits are being used all day long on drag events and they remain consistent all day long.
We do long long pulls on private air strips one after the other and it remains consistent. Thermal efficiency is something that people completely over look with supercharger kits.