View Single Post
      10-23-2013, 06:25 PM   #49
M3PO
Colonel
M3PO's Avatar
84
Rep
2,792
Posts

Drives: '08 IB E92
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: OC

iTrader: (7)

That's really strange. I know that you can't really compare dynos but generally Mustangs are low and 365 on the Mustangs I am familiar with would be ~400 on a Dynojet. Which doesn't make sense; that's an implausible amount of power. Something was screwy IMO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MFL View Post
100% Stock.

Dynojet vs. Mustang isn't an exact ratio and results may vary. The dyno I'm used to has always been on par and accurate with all of my other cars compared to other reliable results around the country.

To be fair, Dynos aren't meant or designed to settle anonymous internet pecker contests.

I was/am just really curious as to what this M3 actually puts down and was a bit shocked when I saw the Mustang dyno results. Everything else looked good, Torque/HP intersected at 5250, so I'm guessing our calibration was spot on.
__________________
2008 IB E92 M3| BBS | KW | Arkym | Platte Forme A.G. | Active Autowerke | K&N | Fabspeed | Dinan | Evolve-R
Appreciate 0